Jump to content

Whiteholes and the fact that none have been found


LabRat1

Recommended Posts

So according to "everything in this universe has something which is same in magnitude but opposite to its nature" Blackholes have whiteholes. But there is no scientific evidence to prove such a thing. Now if we say that blackholes have an immense amount of gravity, then whiteholes should have an immense amount of antigravity(?)(lets repel everything and everyone!!). Is this why none have been found?

 

 

 

 

 

PS
Quick definition of a Whitehole: Your kid in your car after a hearty meal in the downtown restaurant. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So according to "everything in this universe has something which is same in magnitude but opposite to its nature"

 

 

Is there any reason to think that is the case?

 

 

 

Is this why none have been found?

 

Probably because they don't exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a black hole is a bottomless well that sucks in matter and energy, the opposite would be something that expels all ANTI-MATTER and ANTI-ENERGY.

How could anybody tell if they were next to a white hole? It would have expelled everything by now.

And how could anything get in there in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a black hole is a bottomless well that sucks in matter and energy, the opposite would be something that expels all ANTI-MATTER and ANTI-ENERGY.

How could anybody tell if they were next to a white hole? It would have expelled everything by now.

And how could anything get in there in the first place?

Wouldn't the light emanating from them be caught in our cameras or telescopes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"In general relativity, a white hole is a hypothetical region of spacetime which cannot be entered from the outside, although matter and light can escape from it. In this sense, it is the reverse of a black hole, which can only be entered from the outside and from which matter and light cannot escape. White holes appear in the theory of eternal black holes. In addition to a black hole region in the future, such a solution of the Einstein field equations has a white hole region in its past.[1] However, this region does not exist for black holes that have formed through gravitational collapse, nor are there any known physical processes through which a white hole could be formed. No white hole has ever been observed.

 

"Like black holes, white holes have properties like mass, charge, and angular momentum. They attract matter like any other mass, but objects falling towards a white hole would never actually reach the white hole's event horizon[citation needed] (though in the case of the maximally extended Schwarzschild solution, discussed below, the white hole event horizon in the past becomes a black hole event horizon in the future, so any object falling towards it will eventually reach the black hole horizon). Imagine a gravitational field, without a surface. Acceleration due to gravity is the greatest on the surface of any body. But since black holes lack a surface, acceleration due to gravity increases exponentially, but never reaches a final value as there is no considered surface in a singularity."

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hole

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Black holes build athoms from light otherwise today there'd be no athom to produce light!

So there's no white hole because stars are the answer, and black holes energy'd come from big bang(speed).

Edited by harlock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Do they? Do you have a reference or evidence for that?

An opinion.

There're a lot of questions

- Where'is the light going?.......

- How much matter has been transformed into energy till now?!.....

 

An asnwer is there's a cycle: athoms energy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a white hole would be like a bubble or membrane that only allows for one-way passage, that is, light and energy can pass through to the outside but not pass through to the inside?

 

What would happen when there's no longer any mass or energy inside the bubble? Would the void on the inside combined with CMBR pressure on the outside cause the bubble to shrink into nothingness, which is why we can't detect them?

 

Any old white holes would have been emptied and crushed to nothiness from the pressure of regular space by now, and so until we can come up with a hypothetical way for them to be created, there's no evidence to suggest new ones are being made any more.

Edited by Daecon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.