stupidnewton Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 (edited) This makes even less sense than most of what you've posted. So the earth is moving and the earth's inverse square law is somewhere else? Is that the standard of your education? If you are going to say something doesn't make sense, aim for explaining why not. Intellectually you'll get further in life. Are you genuinely struggling to understand the earth's inverse square law is moving around a galaxy? How can an equation move? Is all arithmetic moving as well? If the arithmetic isn't moving, obviously the arithmetic isn't reality if everything is in motion. Your problem is the adage of the mathematical physicist that is suppose to make lies the truth. "Depends what reference frame you use". If you were serious and like truth orientated about the universe, which no-one on this forum seems to be, you have enough diagrams here to see that mathematical physics is set upon false foundation. Do you honestly think Einstein would want his theories worshiped if they were based on the false foundation of fixed in space inverse square laws. Einstein had his human faults but I would suggest he would be above wanting your false worship. In principle you now have the tides. Really you have waking up to do about the universe before you grow old and die. Edited March 13, 2017 by stupidnewton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 So the earth is moving and the earth's inverse square law is somewhere else? The inverse square law doesn't have a location. Is that the standard of your education? If you are going to say something doesn't make sense, aim for explaining why not. Intellectually you'll get further in life. I'm doing just fine, thanks. Are you genuinely struggling to understand the earth's inverse square law is moving around a galaxy? Where is the inverse square law right now? Is this like a timeshare? Earth gets it for a week, but next week it'll be on Jupiter, because Jupiter's next in the queue? When do we get to use it next? Do you honestly think Einstein would want his theories worshiped if they were based on the false foundation of fixed in space inverse square laws. There's no worship; this isn't a religion. As far as false foundations go, Einstein used the foundation that the laws of physics apply in all inertial frames, meaning that to an excellent approximation, you can treat the sun as being at rest when analyzing orbits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stupidnewton Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 The inverse square law doesn't have a location. And who said it did? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 And who said it did? You said "So the earth is moving and the earth's inverse square law is somewhere else?" and "If the earth is moving, it's inverse square law is moving" implying that it has a location. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daecon Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Why are you concentrating on the center of the Milky Way galaxy and not the center of mass for the Virgo supercluster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stupidnewton Posted March 13, 2017 Author Share Posted March 13, 2017 You said "So the earth is moving and the earth's inverse square law is somewhere else?" and "If the earth is moving, it's inverse square law is moving" implying that it has a location. It was a rhetorical question. How hopeless are you on this planet. You can probably handle money I suppose. Why are you concentrating on the center of the Milky Way galaxy and not the center of mass for the Virgo supercluster? Some say the centre of the milky way galaxy is moving at 600 km/sec. The concentration on the motion of an inverse square law means knowledge for us that descents are a curve around the motion of an inverse square. If you can get that you are getting in the picture. All descents are a motion relative to their cause. A curve. Most mathematical physicist are probably trying to see it. But are held back by the insecurity of contemplating Einstein was out of kilter with reality. You said "So the earth is moving and the earth's inverse square law is somewhere else?" and "If the earth is moving, it's inverse square law is moving" implying that it has a location. It was a rhetorical question. How hopeless are you on this planet. You can probably handle money I suppose. Why are you concentrating on the center of the Milky Way galaxy and not the center of mass for the Virgo supercluster? Some say the centre of the milky way galaxy is moving at 600 km/sec. The concentration on the motion of an inverse square law means knowledge for us that descents are a curve around the motion of an inverse square. If you can get that you are getting in the picture. All descents are a motion relative to their cause. A curve. Most mathematical physicist are probably trying to see it. But are held back by the insecurity of contemplating Einstein was out of kilter with reality. The location of the earth's inverse square law is the earth and the earth is moving. Wish to get into silliness is zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrKrettin Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 The location of the earth's inverse square law is the earth and the earth is moving. Wish to get into silliness is zero. Your responses are phenomenally stupid. I hope for your sake that you are just a troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 "Inverse square laws are moving and at speeds much faster than the descents they cause." isn't a rhetorical question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Most mathematical physicist are probably trying to see it. But are held back by the insecurity of contemplating Einstein was out of kilter with reality. Einstein may or may not have been out of kilter with reality (I'll go with "not" from the little I have read) but that seems irrelevant as his theory produces results that are completely consistent with reality. Which, presumably, wouldn't be the case if your claims made any sense at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Wish to get into silliness is zero. ! Moderator Note Agreed. Don't do it again, and please stop wasting member's time with your trolling of science. You seem to have no point to make. Thread closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts