paragaster Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Ram was Hindu, but Laxman was a Muslim. Ravan was cousin of Ram. Ram was good. He was present in the Mahabharta war. He was also known as Krishna. The Kaurav were Muslims and the Pandavs were Hindus. The Pandavs lost the war. Muslims have kept the record. Ram was born after Islam came into existence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 None of this is science. Some may not even be facts. There's nothing to discuss. Perhaps you meant to write this on your personal blog or in a diary. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sriman Dutta Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Hi, paragaster are you an Indian? Or Hindu researcher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 ! Moderator Note Moved to religion. Please clarify what it is you wish to discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer1 Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 ok so even tho this forum is dead i want to clarify this Islam was not created by the time this happened. even is it did exist it ONLY came to india in the 10th century LONG LONG TIME after when it happened. See ram and Krishna are the form of the same person Vishnu but not THE EXACT same. Also the pandavs won the kurukshetrya was and both sides were hindu as they happened more that 2000 bce. You are saying Ravan is the cousin of ram while one liven in present day srilanka and the other lived in present day uttar pradesh Even if you say ram is an incarnation of vishnu and ravan is the great great great grandson of bramha, it does not make them and much blood related Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peterkin Posted August 17, 2022 Share Posted August 17, 2022 3 hours ago, observer1 said: ok so even tho this forum is dead i want to clarify this The forum isn't dead; the thread died at birth. It wasn't attempting to discuss anything then, and you're not proposing to discuss anything now. A more coherent version of the history of India's religions might lead to some kind of discussion, but there would be need to be a relevant question at the center of that discussion. I don't see one here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now