Who is Boltzmann, Coulomb, and Avogadro?

[Garry Denke]

According to Max Planck :

 

Planck's seven (7) primary universal base unit values

1) Planck intensity : (bar-hG/c^5)^1/2/sr = 7.8672231(80) x 10^-46 cd

2) Planck time : (bar-hG/c^5)^1/2 = 5.3904639(43) x 10^-44 s

3) Planck length : (bar-hG/c^3)^1/2 = 1.6160204(35) x 10^-35 m

4) Planck substance : (bar-hc/G)^1/2/M = 6.6245916(02) x 10^-28 kmol

5) Planck mass : (bar-hc/G)^1/2 = 2.1767500(08) x 10^-8 kg

6) Planck current : e/(bar-hG/c^5)^1/2 = 2.9722423(67) x 10^24 A

7) Planck temperature : (bar-hc^5/G)^1/2/k = 1.4169882(01) x 10^32 K

 

According to Albert Einstein :

 

Einstein's seven (7) primary universal base unit values

1) Einstein intensity : (hG/c^5)^1/2/sr = 1.9720204(06) x 10^-45 cd

2) Einstein time : (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 s

3) Einstein length : (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(15) x 10^-35 m

4) Einstein substance : (hc/G)^1/2/M = 1.6605388(62) x 10^-27 kmol

5) Einstein mass : (hc/G)^1/2 = 5.4563031(18) x 10^-8 kg

6) Einstein current : e/(hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.1857531(48) x 10^24 A

7) Einstein temperature : (hc^5/G)^1/2/k = 3.5518626(92) x 10^32 K

 

According to Planck & Einstein :

 

Planck & Einstein two (2) primary universal base angles

1) Einstein relative permeability : steradian = 6.8517999(55) x 10^1 sr

2) Planck inverse fine-structure : radian = 1.3703599(91) x 10^2 rad

 

According to Einstein & Planck :

http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/

Planck h/2pi : bar-h = 1.0545716(84) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s

Planck constant : h = 6.6260693(11) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s

Boltzmann constant : k = 1.3806504(11) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K

Coulomb elementary charge : e = 1.6021765(31) x 10^-19 A-s

Newton constant : G = 6.6723635(22) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2

Einstein relative permeability : steradian = 6.8517999(55) x 10^1 sr

Einstein speed of light in vacuum : c = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s

Avogadro molar mass : M = 3.2858629(47) x 10^19 kg/kmol

Question #1 : Who is Ludwig Boltzmann?

Question #2 : Who is Charles Coulomb?

Question #3 : Who is Amadeo Avogadro?

Thanks for helping,

 

Garry Denke

[Sayonara]

Have you tried the Wikipedia?

[Garry Denke]

Have you tried the Wikipedia?

Yes, about half an hour ago.

Boltzmann has 2n's, not 1n.

 

Thanks for helping,

 

Garry Denke

[5614]

Well Charles Coulomb is pretty famous, he's all over the web:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles-Augustin_de_Coulomb

 

As is Avogadro:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avogadro

 

As is Boltzmann:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Boltzmann

(Boltzman with one 'n' is just Boltzmann spelt wrong!)

 

So, uh, what was wrong with wiki?

[Garry Denke]

Well Charles Coulomb is pretty famous' date=' he's all over the web:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles-Augustin_de_Coulomb

 

As is Avogadro:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avogadro

 

As is Boltzmann:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Boltzmann

[i'](Boltzman with one 'n' is just Boltzmann spelt wrong!)[/i]

 

So, uh, what was wrong with wiki?

Making sure this had the right terminology.

Einstein's nine (9) primary fundamental universal base unit values

1) Einstein intensity: [(hG/c^5)^1/2]/sr = 9.8601020(30) x 10^-46 cd

2) Einstein time: (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 s

3) Einstein length: (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(15) x 10^-35 m

4) Einstein substance: [(hc/G)^1/2]/M = 1.6605388(62) x 10^-27 kmol

5) Einstein mass: (hc/G)^1/2 = 5.4563031(18) x 10^-8 kg

6) Einstein current: e/[(hG/c^5)^1/2] = 1.1857531(48) x 10^24 A

7) Einstein temperature: [(hc^5/G)^1/2]/k = 3.5518626(92) x 10^32 K

8) Einstein relative permeability: (e0hc)/e^2 = 6.8517999(55) x 10^1 rad

9) Einstein inverse fine-structure: (2e0hc)/e^2 = 1.3703599(91) x 10^2 sr

Planck's non-primary fundamental non-universal base unit values

1) Planck intensity: [(bar-hG/c^5)^1/2]/sr = 3.9336115(89) x 10^-46 cd

2) Planck time: (bar-hG/c^5)^1/2 = 5.3904639(43) x 10^-44 s

3) Planck length: (bar-hG/c^3)^1/2 = 1.6160204(35) x 10^-35 m

4) Planck substance: [(bar-hc/G)^1/2]/M = 6.6245916(02) x 10^-28 kmol

5) Planck mass: (bar-hc/G)^1/2 = 2.1767500(08) x 10^-8 kg

6) Planck current: e/[(bar-hG/c^5)^1/2] = 2.9722423(67) x 10^24 A

7) Planck temperature: [(bar-hc^5/G)^1/2]/k = 1.4169882(01) x 10^32 K

Legend's http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/

Planck constant: h = 6.6260693(11) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s

Newton constant: G = 6.6723635(22) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2

speed of light in vacuum: c = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s

Einstein molar mass: M = 3.2858629(47) x 10^19 kg/kmol

elementary charge: e = 1.6021765(31) x 10^-19 A-s

Boltzmann constant: k = 1.3806504(11) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K

electric constant: e0 = 8.854187817... x 10^-12 A^2-s^4-rad/kg-m^3

Planck h/2(pi): bar-h = 1.0545716(84) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s

Thanks for helping 5614,

Garry Denke

[invert_nexus]

Aww. Should have known that other thread would get deleted.

 

Anyway. I'll repost my post from it in here. I'd like some answers from people that understand physics. The other forums I reference are short on knowledgeable physics people right now.

 

So the following is a cut and paste from a now deleted thread (slightly modified):

 

===========================================

 

Could somebody in the know about physics and these constants say something about this?

Garry here is all over the net with this as well as other things... but lately he's been obsessed with these lists of constants. I've guessed over in another forum what he might have been on about (I won't get into that here) but it appears that I might have been wrong.

It would now appear that he's trying to say that NIST has faulty entries on their website? I've searched around and it seems that all the listed constants are correct but maybe they got them from Nist!?

 

Anyway, I'd just like to know if he is actually trying to make a point (I invited him to just say what he wanted to say over in the other place but he refused) or if he's just 'acting' weird for attention. I'm betting on the latter but could very easily be wrong.

 

I'm not up on physics and so am not in a position to comment. So. Some help here?

 

(I would be surprised if he hasn't posted these constants in a multitude of other threads down in your religious forum as well. Yeah. I know. Don't ask me what they have to do with religion and Garry's not talking. I made my guess and he won't confirm or deny.)

 

 

Edit:

I spent a bit of time going over his post history here. He seems to have actually said things more clearly here than in any other forum I've seen him ramble in.

 

He's gone on about these constants for a far longer time than I've been aware. I thought it was a relatively recent transmutation of his psychosis, but it would seem that it's not so recent.

 

His past references to these constants always seem to lead to gravitons, and I presume that his present scenario is likely no different. I think that he thinks that the unearthing of the Ark of the Covenant that he believes is buried beneath the heelstone of Stone Henge will release a surge of gravitons or something.

 

You really have to wonder about people who fall prey to such strange beliefs.

 

I wonder if he really believes it of if he's pretending? He's spent a long time on his 'quest' for it to be artifice. I wonder what his friends and family think of him? I wonder if they're scared of his irrationality?

 

Anyway. I'd still appreciate if someone could identify if there is something erroneous about the listings of constants from the nist site. But I doubt if there is. I think he's just groping for attention.