Jump to content

Endy0816

Senior Members
  • Posts

    3303
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Endy0816

  1. Advertisement dollars, promotional books, kits, research funding, etc. Big business selling people snake oil. I'd do it myself if I could stomach the hypocrisy. Einstein also said, "You have to learn the rules of the game. And then you have to play better than anyone else." The 3 laws of thermodynamics are the rules of the game. Within those rules you still have a ton of room to maneuver. There are real world novel energy sources you could apply your intelligence to instead. Microbial, human bio-energy, tidal, etc. Pseudoscience will just rot your brain.
  2. Original page - translated Fraudsters! Just who I would want to lend credibility.
  3. Just to note, most posters here dislike video "proofs". Serious time sucks. There is ambient electricity. The problem is tapping it in an efficient manner. Mainly thinking Telluric currents, Earth's magnetic field and your neighborhood leakage. Mostly low energy sources or come with high inefficiencies. The easiest issue to pinpoint in SEG is that the permanent magnets would lose energy. You certainly could get something to spin for awhile running off them, but it wouldn't go on forever. For that matter if you did have a free energy source that for whatever reason required magnets, electromagnets would be more reasonable to work with instead. ...and there are some impossible things. You cannot breath in a vacuum no matter how much you believe. Your thoughts can impact reality and your perception of that reality, but reality still has the final say.
  4. Really nobody knows for sure, so you are free to believe whatever you want on this one. My own thought is that a singularity wouldn't be a singularity anymore in an environment without space itself existing. MU/0 => MU Cyclic universe theory with an entropy reset going on in between. Best fit in terms of observable phenomenon. There are plenty of other theories out there though. God, vacuum fluctuation, colliding branes, you name it.
  5. Once more unto the breach... So from this we see that these units were made up wholesale for a specific reason. 1Q = If Planck Charge(Q) did not have this property it would not be Planck Charge. It must equal 1.875 x 10-18 coulombs or it would not be Planck Charge. Electric charge does not equal this, thus, it is not Planck Charge. This allows us to say something like 5Q instead of 5 times that entire mess up there. It is purely for convenience. In no way does it somehow dethrone Electric charge. This came off stronger than I typically care to write, but I really see no other way of getting through. Please for your own sake take it to heart and consider your stance.
  6. They can obtain location data legally from public information your phone broadcasts, legally from the provider and less than legally through hacking. Might as well give up the ghost on that one. I was just thinking an anonymous database for everyone located within some radius of a crime. When something occurs an automated non-binding request for assistance goes out. Something reasonable that balances both privacy and security.
  7. We commonly don't do this in the US for many of the same reasons listed. Considering the religious and human rights issues I strongly doubt there will be any national implementation. I find it more than a little concerning that other countries think we're happy to microchip ourselves. IMO more useful would be tracking all the phone GPS data. Would help to rapidly narrow down potential suspect/witness pools.
  8. You can get them on Amazon and ibuydinar.com. Please only purchase if you have a genuine need.
  9. Federal Deficit: An excess of the federal government's spending over its revenue A deficit may lead to debt, but they really are two different things. You reduce a deficit through balancing revenue and spending. You reduce a debt by making payments. The payments could come straight from tax dollars or you can increase the total amount of money in circulation. Either option is equally valid if not equally wise.
  10. A version of Hyaluronan, produced by the naked mole rat and another one that cells are unable to digest(simulating starvation). The name of the second escapes me at the moment.
  11. Qpl^2 / ( 4*pi*ε R) != h–bar* C / R (3) This is true. If two things were not equal in the first place they won't be equal in the end. You doing the equivalent of saying: 1 = 2. I don't know any other way to put this. Whatever you think, the two terms are referring to different values. They are not the same. You cannot set them equal.
  12. The pathway for apoptosis itself can suffer from mutations. There might actually be nutrition based preventative measures. Neither of the two sugars I know of are in anyone's normal diet though.
  13. You've posted on this going back to at least 2008, across assorted forums and discussion boards... Yes, as far as it goes, Gravity is a force. You would be best off looking at the principles of orbital mechanics, aerodynamics and atmospheric phenomenon. Based on historical evidence I doubt this will occur, but one can hope.
  14. I would think that introduced undesirable traits would be selected against pretty quickly once they were discovered. Introducing a ditch weed version would probably be a good idea though. There are a number of modified cannabis and opium plants already out there. Most work to improve the potency though.
  15. It takes more energy to split the Water than you can get back via combustion. We used to regularly vent hydrogen from the O2 generator on the sub.
  16. Would you not find this insulting if someone did this to you? Don't insult and don't demonstrate willful ignorance. Not hugely complicated. Some of your posts are perfectly fine, others demonstrate inappropriate behavior and were rewarded appropriately. You want to smack someone down, smack them down with statements of facts and numbers. You attack the person and you have already admitted that your own argument was insufficient.
  17. Yeah, initial recoil force would be the issue.
  18. I had some thought that a black hole might instead represent a tunnel going forward through space-time as far as the external Universe is concerned. The "why" might just be the result of a force that has no counter force. I remember looking at Coulomb's law and seeing a similar breakdown state that isn't observed in reality. I don't think anyone can offer a definitive answer though.
  19. Yeah, "Let's Move" falls under the White House, which makes sense considering. Looks to be on a commercial server anyways. Already payed for, no real point in killing it.
  20. On the plus side, you'd feel a lot better looking at the distance. NY to LA: Only 4.7454284e-10 Light Years
  21. No, my stance is that other species are here for their own sake. We should keep them around to help ensure our own survival. More than reasonable considering it includes every genome on the planet.
  22. I base my actions on how much of the modern support system I have access to. Don't kill unnecessarily, but be willing to kill if your own survival depends on it. Broadly speaking we need other life to provide us with novel genetic variations. No easy way to simulate it all, nor see the compound interactions that occur as a result. Other life can act as a disease vector, but our own farm animals are some of the worst threats. We could eliminate that risk at present and will, literally, have more palatable options in the future. I don't see that as a viable reason.
  23. Sounds like a vanity press issue. Universities will probably start asking for quality assurance reviews of the journals. You'll have to be published within that subset for your paper to be recognized.
  24. He's gone, but yeah, we've never seen any particular proof for one. Universe likely came from something resembling a black hole. Not sure the definition fits with the state space itself was in at that point, but only word we have that fits. I would think there would be re-collapse issues if some part of it continued to exist after the initiation of the Universe. Besides that there would be the question as to why some matter "exited" and other matter did not. I don't see any particular reason it would play favorites. I'm of the opinion the Universe might just cycle through different initial conditions. Not sure how or if ever we'll be able to prove or disprove such conjecture though.
  25. Google Translate might provide some clues. They appear to be relating to numerical expressions. You may need to go to a teacher or fellow student for a translation in context.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.