I like the subjectivism in English. It makes a nice change from silence. There's no definitive answer. There's no one intepretation. Every opinion is valid as long as you can back it up with fact. I enjoy using both styles of thinking
How will you measure which neurons are being fired? Are you doing this research at university/hospital with PET scan capabilities? Will you use the radioactive tracers?
I've never heard any evidence towards this. The lagging strand (the discontinued replicated strand, made by okazaki fragments) will replicate slower then the leading strand. I would think nucleases and polymerases identify and correct most mistakes.
No, just go to http://www.geocities.com create a free username if you don't already have a yahoo passport. Then upload the file onto your file manager. Then post the link on the forum.
I'm in the same situation as you, although a little more decided. I suggest you use http://www.collegeboard.com to help you look for colleges and universities. (althgouh now that I think of it, that might be for American universities.) Good luck, whatever you decide to do.
For an object going that fast, it would need a large deceleration time. Maybe if the flight went past it's target and was able to turn around in flight while decelerating. I don't know too much about this. Does that make any sense?
My friend had an idea. A sword that contained, at it's tip, atoms with opposite charges. Somehow blowing all positivly charged and negative charged atoms apart.
Thanks, that's the equation I was missing. I couldn't get from applied force to Force of Friction (the only resistive force being considered).
Thanks for your help guys.
Could anyone help me with this problem?
a force of 40.0N accelerates a 5.0kg block at 6.0m/s^2 along a horizontal surface. How large is the frictional force? What is the coefficient of friction?
I can't figure out how to get the force of friction without given the proportionality constant.
Technically you're right, but it's my fault I should have made the picture clearer. By the question mark, I meant you didn't know the phenotype or genotype of the mother. I'm sorry, that doesn't make to much sense. How could you see the phenotype of one and not the other? I just creating a hypothetical situation. I should have been more specific. Sorry
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.