Jordan14

Wow if this is true (which I doubt) it's pretty amazing. I would really, REALLY like a link. I doubt it because it kills many, MANY rules. Too many rules!! I repeat I want a link!!

Yes it's working but I can't help you with your personal statement. Sorry

I don't know if anyone has read about that astronomers have discover dual images of both galaxies and a quaser. This means that the light had to have taken two directions, something a superstring might do. I can't actually find a very good link this is the best I can get because New Scienctist's article has to be payed for: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18424781.400 Any other links will be of good use

I wasn't saying that the pioneer abnormity was the end of Gen Rel, I myself beleive that nothing can be actually disproved. But it's the fact that the pioneer abnormity seems to sign to the scientific community that Gen Rel COULD have have a part in the pioneer abnormity. I don't actually think there is actually a good reason for the pioneer abnormity. I myself think it MIGHT be related to the Allais' finding, and I think we can't ignore infomation against Gen Rel to move forward we have to think outside of the box.

I think it's just the ideas of the mad scienctists that produce abstract calculations to prove that time travel is possible. However even though Allais' finding are strange I definatly don't think his ideas were that of a mad scienctist I think that his results are indeed something that gan rel need to consult over. Also the pioneer abnormity might be also what Artorius is talking about, this proves that there is a problem with gen rel.

I have a nice link here that I hope is going to solve my problem, at first I thought it was CWS but as I said I ran CWShredder so I missed out all these links and i left me with this about a person that e-mailed google it's wortha visit if it happens to someone else. The redirection system for google is pretty rubbish: http://www.lexiline.com/andiskaulins/blog/2003/09/stopping-google-redirection-in-foreign.htm

I've done all that. I'm going to google search my problem maybe someone else has had the same thing as me. Probally not though.

Yeah I have to go to the link on the bottom of google saying Google in English and it leads me to http://www.google.com the real one this time. However in the bottom of google there's alway the link saying go to google in deushland (sp). I thought that there might be a problem with google, or maybe there was some virus or something on my comp that puts up a page that is supposed to be google but infact it's not the real one. Any more ideas?

When ever I go to http://www.google.com it rediredts me to http://www.google.de (the German site)!! I live in England, what the hell is going on. I didn't think spyware done stuff like this. Any Ideas??

I presume it would take the same time a normal computer would to break an encryption make by another normal computer. Because it's not the complexity of the coding it's the difference between the stadard of the two computers, so comparing to standard computers is the same as comparing to quantum computers. I think.

Sorry about that

Here's a good link: http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/quantum/quantum.jsp?id=ns99993114

Spurred by other posts I was thinking the doesn't quantum entanglement, the links between the electron and the positron, defy relivity. Because can't entanglement provide an instaneous form of communication across the whole universe.

Yep it's all about entanglement, the mysterious link between the electron and the positron which decay from the pion. The elctron and the positron however far away from each other form a bond and what ever the electron doesthe positron does the exact opposite, this makes communication in a computer a damn lot faster, I think i'n right. Theres a debate going on at the moment related to these links, go and google pseudo-telepathy.

I come across this when I was investigating the game Hex, I've heard of it before but can someone with a little bit more knowledge explain this to me. It would be appreciated,

Exactly like I have stated can a Heisman's principle ever be overuled, be technology be created to account for HUP that can actually give measurements for the position and velocity of objects.

How do you post your desktop. It won't let me paste the image in

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/03/20/north.pole/ And here's a graphic picture http://www.cnn.com/interactive/tech/0203/north.pole/popup.north.pole1.gif

The magnetic pole shift has actually started happening, an analysis by I think a Norwegian has shown that the pole is moving at quite a rate. I'll try and find some links.

I didn't either

In the science community, often regarded as the predesesor of DNA and proteins, and often overlooked. Recent finding suggest that is more ncRNA than protein making RNA suggesting a bigger role for RNA. Has anyone got any opinions or more infomation on the subject. I myself beleive that RNA deserves more recognition and shouldn't be veiwed as a subserviant messager.

I would just like to say, keep up the good work

I read about this as well, and there are many people complaining that there is a small mistake in gen rel. There say that Allais findings could be linked in with the Pioneer abnormalty. Much more evidence will be needed though to even attempt to overule gen rel. But what I think is most compelling aspect of Allais' finding is that the experiments have been repeated five or six times in different countries, at different times and the results have been the same, because at first I would have conceived the results to be a mistake or instrumens failing.

Yep told you it was a little easy

This is probally a little easy A boat is moored to a jetty, and from the side of the boat hangs a ladder. Its bottomrung just touches the top of the water, the tide comes in and the water rises at a rate of 10cms an hour. The circular rungs have a diameter of 1cm and the spacing between each rung is 10cms. After 10 hours how many rungs are submerged.