Moontanman

Pluto is an ice world but it is possible it is reddish like some other bodies where it's at due to sunlight causes hydrocarbon ices to form larger molecules. The earth is mostly covered by blue water and or life on land but there are expanses of earth crust that are reddish or orangish in color due to iron oxides and other oxides. The earth also recycles it's surface as plate tectonics renews the planets surface. Mars is unlikely to have plate tectonics but it is big enough to have iron oxides on the surface where charged particles from the sun generates peroxides from the water and other chemicals on the surface of Mars.

I believe the universe is really running back wards, what we think of the past is really us remembering the future, what we think of as our future is our recently forgotten past. only the past is real as we go back toward our birth it's really the end of our lives. Life is spontaneous, we appear in the ground as minerals spontaneously concentrate to make a human in the ground inside a casket. The casket is dug up, the body inside goes to the funeral parlor and reanimates as we slowly begin to grow young eventually disappearing into our mothers womb.

I like fire, what do we need to burn?

Oh yeah, who gives you num-nums ydoaPs?

I just thought of something, what if you bent a bar magnet or horseshoe magnet until the poles were merged together in a circle what would the field lines look like?

I would think they could loose heat, a neutron star should radiate away it's heat quickly due the it being so small.

Maybe it was made of Scrith, of course then you'd need a Cziltang Brone to pass through it

Personally I am leaning toward colliding membranes in a multidimensional bulk space....

I'd rather post in an atmosphere that is critical of an idea than where it is embraced without question.

A computer simulation can be programed to do the exact same thing over and over, the brain might try to do the same thing but the pathways are always different and the out come is never exactly he same due to fluctuations that cannot be controlled in any real way. A computer also has to be programed, the program will always run to the same conclusion along the same pathways, given the same programing a human will never come to the exact same conclusion the exact same way.

I'm a weird guy, IMHO there is always a real difference between reality and a simulation, if nothing else a simulation can be repeated, reality cannot, but sadly I cannot take the argument any further...

Ninus, you are so full of shit it's not funny, yes i have friends but none of them would let me get by with the bullshit you suggest, and I am totally ignorant, barely able to count money and spell, lol. I am just speechless at how much you smell like troll.... yeah i know, spank me, he is still a troll....

I almost hate to poke this hornets nest again... almost... but without stings how do you know pleasure? I haven't really looked into Foo Fighters in recent years, believing like most there was no way to really investigate something too ethereal to have any physical effects. I didn't know there were real interactions between WW2 aircraft and Foo Fighters that resulted in actual physical effects but to anyone who is interested in the enigma of what UFOs were or are and who or what really dictates what we believe here we go (looking at the UFO phenomenon is like looking in a mirror, everyone sees something inside themselves in some way) So here goes... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foo_fighter Or...

The sad thing is I can't figure out which side agrees with me, I hate having to choose a side!

Restricting freedom of speech scares me so bad it could change my political views completly.... Who decides what is acceptable? Evangelical Christians? Muslim clerics? Asexual self righteous demigods? Everybody does it, most like it, no one wants to admit to doing it or liking it , especially not liking to watch it> Has anyone else noticed that the spell cheeker gives you IBM'S for the word Obama's?

Ok, so IF It were possible to be an outside observer in a universe wide time frame the moving object's mass increase with speed would not be real? I'm trying I really am...

I once read about a system that used a cylinder of nuetronium spin at almost the speed of light. It produced a worm hole type effect, i can't remember exactly where or when.... Is this what you are referring too?

Beefmaster is good, how about Steakem?

Penrose would disagree... http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/penrose.htm What's the difference between virtual reality and reality?

Thou art god...

Evidently i am just not intelligent enough to wrap my head around the idea of relativity. In my mind's eye I can't get around the idea that nearing the speed of light anything with mass would wrap it's self in a black hole and disappear from our universe...

Ok, that is what i wanted to hear or read, I know it's the null theory but null doesn't make it right just more likely to be right but I agree that anti-matter is unlikely to have negative mass. I was just curious if the GEM would be compatible with matter/anti-matter being gravitationally repulsive and negative/positive mass.

Wrong or simply hasn't been experimentally confirmed but seems to be the only way it could work if curvature of space-time is how gravity is propagated? I know it is assumed that matter and anti-matter attract but there are other schools of thought and so far no one has presented real world evidence that confirms or denies it. What i want to know is if the gravitomagnetic theory is correct does it lend more credibility to the theory that matter and anti-matter repel each other? The idea that anti-matter could negatively curve space is difficult to deal with but the idea that anti-matter repels matter through particle interaction is a bit easier to swallow.

Please forgive me for being completely ignorant in this but i want to ask if the idea that antimatter is repulsive to matter gravitationally is connected with gravitomagnetism?