Jump to content

sumit

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sumit

  1. oh alright. Thanks a lot! also can you tell me which programming language is used to create a site like facebook, you know right from the layout to keeping track of all info. Both the front end and back end.

    also which language is good for making simulation games. Java? flash? or any other

    thanks!

  2. Which programming language is the sims social using? How did they integrate it with facebook. To create a sims like simulation a great engine is required. Does facebook provide the engine? or if not how does it work. I would appreaciate if someone helps me out. What i'm trying to do is to create a sims like game and upload it on a website. Thus which programming language should i use keeping in mind that it requires no installation on the users part but also keeping the level of graphics like sims.(similar).

    thanks!

  3. Is the creation of an A.I really possible. I mean can we really write an algorithm to define life? Even the self evolving algorithms lead to nothing more than a new database of what to say when or what to avoid when. What is it that we're missing? any ideas are welcomed. Put forward your theory on how it can be created.

  4. I like your ambition, but your statements speak of self obsession. Do stuff first and then show this pride. Actions speak louder than words. We all have that inner drive to pursue great things and become immortal in thought, but for that my friend we work hard. Let your work do this talking. Don't start comparisons with great men until you reach that level. I understand you completely, because i was like you some time ago, but i figured the drive to do greater things must be channeled properly. I wish you the best!

  5. There are too many ''no it's not'' to actually cover here... so just an overall ''No it's not'' will do.

     

    Only the answers you have given can be out of a lack of understanding of modern theoretical and experimental physics.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    As for st Augustine's quote... a bit outdated to be true. I did have a conversation with someone recently about this feeling of past becoming present and present becoming future. As I said to someone on another site

     

    ''

     

    And yes, some might call the present moment a record of the past, or rather as you said, the period of time including a present moment. So one way to write this is by saying, the present [math]t_1[/math] is the past [math]t_0[/math] plus a time delay [math]\Delta t[/math] as

     

    [math]t_1 = t_0 + \Delta t[/math]

     

    abstractly this is ok. It makes sense to think of the present moment in this case as some present moment that once existed in the past and which then a small change in time led up to the present moment we recognize as ''now''. Just keep in mind, that the past [math]t_0[/math] can't have any physical relevance. I use past and future here as [math](t_0,t_1)[/math], notation may vary.

     

    Using the above equation, one could argue the future [math]t_2[/math] is the present plus a change in time as

     

    [math]t_2 = t_1 + \Delta t[/math]

     

    But how does one make sense of the future in a physical sense? The future has not happened, and in fact, never happens. This is the paradox of our experience of time - all there is is the present moment nothing exists outside of it, nothing flows into the present moment or out of it.''

     

    The easy solution to this, is to remember there is no flow to time. There is nothing which flows into or out of the present moment, and a present moment never is a ''true existing past.'' If it doesn't exist ''now'' it doesn't exist at all. Simple.

     

     

    you're saying gravity,light and time are not related, cos that's what i wrote?. And as for st Augustine's quote , its just a thought to ponder about, nothing to support my claims. So just overall, man i feel so sorry for you. I'm not sure if you're aware of the entropy (arrow of time), as one goes forward in time the entropy of an isolated system will increase. Hence, from one perspective, entropy measurement is a way of distinguishing the past from the future. So your theory saying nothing flows out of the present moment or out of it is completely wrong. Please read more about entropy before debating here cos i'm sure all you'll come up with are lame equations. Seriously those equations prove nothing. If you're in any way related to physics, please check your facts before replying. Again, i feel sorry for you

  6. Time is the continuous sequence of existence and events that occur in apparently irreversible succession from the past through the present to the future.(wiki)

    We perceive time through events we see. Hence as soon as the "light" from those events reaches our eyes, we see them happening and changing. Where there is light, there is time. And we know that gravity distorts time. More the gravity, time slows down and less gravity, time speeds up. This is why inside a black hole , it is assumed that there is no time since the gravity is immense. Thus the union of time and gravity gives rise to the dimension of time( according to me). Time is something we're confined under. We cannot imagine a world beyond time. We are incapable of perceiving the VOID.

    interesting thought:

    Of these three divisions of time [past, present, and future], then how can two, the past and the future, be, when the past no longer is and the future is not yet? As for the present, if it were always present and never moved on to become the past, it would not be time but eternity. If, therefore, the present time is time only by reason of the fact that it moves on to become the past, how can we say that even the present is, when the reason why it is that it is not to be? In other words, we cannot rightly say that time is, except by reason of its impending state of not being. – St. Augustine; The Confessions, Book XI

  7. Alright. So is it possible to rotate the conductor perpendicular to the magnetic field first(mechanically), store the charge in a capacitor and then use the stored charge to move the conductor again and keep doing this on and on.

     

     

     

     

    PS- when the conductor is moved again the second time using the stored charge in the capacitor , no mechanical energy is used. Only the energy of the charge stored in the previous rotation(which was mechanical).

  8. The energy in the system comes form the mechanical work moving the conductor.

     

    Don't forget that it is not any old movement in a magnetic field that counts it is movement perpendicular to the field. Movement parallel to the field has no effect.

     

     

     

    yeah thanks!

  9. Since motion in a magnetic field by a conductor produces electrical charge in the conductor, does the strength of magnetic field degrade over time if we keep the conductor in motion? IF no then does anything degrade or lose energy over time in this scenario other than the fact that I lose energy in moving the conductor.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.