Jump to content


Senior Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Consistency

  1. My life experience says different. Are you sure that I can submit a paper for peer review without formal education? I chose my words carefully, it wouldn't be very smart of me now to post the name of the molecule and solution on an internet forum. The pathway is not going to tell you which molecule stimulates which gene but it will tell you what I said. I understand that its irrelevant on an individual basis... survival of the fittest with getting the dose of B12 but it is relevant in the big picture sense when there is a B12 deficiency epidemic. I really don't understand how this has anything to do with the thread.
  2. I will agree with you if a coma is not the result of human civilization. Fair enough?
  3. A person in a coma doesn't need a IV feeding needle and oxygen supply for the brain after the initial 24 hours? In other words.. can they swallow their own food? Are they able to sufficiently supply oxygen to their brain without medical intervention?
  4. You know your stuff. Some of it is assumption. I don't want to give out too much information but if you look at the B12 biosynthetic pathways, you'll notice that there are 2 biosynthetic pathways in mammalian bacteria and 1 biosynthetic pathway in soil bacteria. 1st biosynthetic pathway which starts from L-Glutamate follows the fermentation method, soil bacteria only have this pathway, as in only have 1 set of enzymes. 2nd biosynthetic pathway follows the stimulation pathway where bacteria get stimulated to produce B12 instantaneously by a specific molecule only produced by mammals. Look at http://www.cronometer.com and find me a food which can fulfill daily requirements. Liver? Is there enough liver available to fulfill daily requirements for everyone? The math doesn't add up. If I say it.. are you able to do something about it? Tell me the quantity that we produce?
  5. It is real scientific evidence, impossible to dispute and too long to post on a forum. The science has already been done in bits and pieces across different scientific fields; all I have done is made the connections across these different scientific fields and corrected an error. The only thing I don't know is the quantity produced and this is the only thing I really would like to know. Its definitely up to standards. I don't trust the jounals, for fear that they will bury the truth out of jealousy and people don't listen to those without formal education even though they are very well informed in a particular subject. This is true in mainstream but not when knowing what I know. B12 is not made automatically unless certain conditions are met and not found in nature to fulfill daily requirements. This was my intial statement which still holds true today... "There isn't enough Vitamin B12 in animal products to fulfill daily human requirements." If the above is true, which it is, then it is also true that we MUST produce it somehow. Its an assumption that we humans produce it through fermentation. We are primates; not ruminants.
  6. Show actual numbers of survival rates after 5 years. Not predicted numbers. Prediction is a guess and guesses aren't facts. You just proved my previous point. Predictions are not facts and as you can see.. survival rates diminish over time.. people die from eating the same toxic diet. How can you possibly claim it doesn't work when you haven't personally tried it yourself? I've drank a lot of fresh squeezed carrot juice and know very well first hand the benefits of it. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10559547 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10333733 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21358592 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15550456 Antioxidants are primarely found in plants. Fresh squeezed carrot juice is the basis of the gerson therapy. Very high in beta-carotene. http://nutritionfacts.org/questions/might-too-many-antioxidants-cause-cancer/ Again.. not everyone is incompetent. There is a lot of people that have went the gerson therapy route and cured their cancer. She is an example of curing her skin cancer... http://www.thewellnesswarrior.com.au/ Cancer grows in an acidic and oxygen deprived environment. Cancer doesn't grow in an alkaline and oxygen rich environment. Animal products contain high amounts of carcinogens(preservatives), raise uric acid levels and are acidic in the body. Plants are alkaline and rich in minerals like Iron which is needed for hemoglobin. More hemoglobin.. more oxygen to the rest of the body and less cancer. A couple of incompetent gullible people doesn't refute the mountain of scientific evidence in favor of plants. You should refute this website and all the research along with it... http://nutritionfacts.org/topics/breast-cancer/ Cancer doctors are bullies and thats why alternative cancer treatments are banned in the US. And like I said.. Cancer doctors can't patent plants. Hence there is no profits. Hence doctors have to use toxic chemotherapy so they can have a nice mercedes-benz in their drive-way. Hence my original comment.. Doctors lack morals. Attack the argument. Not the person(mercola). Sure Mercola is a huckster but he didn't lie.
  7. This for now... http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/08/14/beautiful-truth-about-outlawed-cancer-treatment.aspx I will add scientific facts tomorrow.
  8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconscious http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconsciousness (Coma) <-- Unnatural state. People in a coma cannot live without life support. A person can be in a deep thought and be unconscious to the environment. Alive: Conscious, Unconscious.
  9. What does being unconscious mean to you?
  10. The theory is about how humans co-produce Vitamin B12 with bacteria. I've known this for over a year and the evidence is easily over 10 pages. How can I propose it?
  11. Alive: Consciousness You'll learn more about the universe by experiencing it for yourself first hand.
  12. I wouldn't mind reading it. PDF please. Lets say that I am able to do the experiment in my head... is it a theory or an experiment?
  13. Correction: It works within 5 years. Most patients die after 5 years. Thats not a cure. Its a manipulated cure to distort the horrible truth. - Did you know that chemotherapy descendent from the nazi's? Can you prodive scientific evidence on cancer "surival rates" AFTER 5 years? Its written by scientists. Its bias and the gerson therapy was never thoroughly tested. I agree with the first part mainly because the majority of people eat nutritionally deficienct diets. So.. its no surprise that their health remains the same. Bold part: They went on the gerson therapy by drinking a lot of freshly squeezed carrot juice, green juices and 3 plant based meals a day. Just because a lot of people are incompetent, doesn't mean everyone is. You are distorting what I said and/or making assumptions about what I mean. Just because I don't agree with you because of the doctors big pharma peddleing ways, it doesn't mean I agree with the hippies with the herbs. But the natural crap doesn't contain major side effects like the crap the doctors peddle. The first gerson therapy probably did more harm than good. When they were using cod liver oil and juiced liver instead of carrot juice. Do you seriously believe that the body can't fight its own battle when given nutrients from natural foods? As in vegetable juices? Even with all the science; doctors will never admit that plant foods are superior than chemotherapy. Their reputation is more important than saving a life.
  14. And Chemotherapy isn't dangerous? Whats the PH of chemotherapy? 1.5-2? Pumping battery acid in the vains isn't dangerous? The wikipedia page is extremely slanderous! The body cures itself when it receives the vitamins and minerals it needs from natural foods. The body is self-regulating. Like when a person cuts their finger.. the cut heals on its own. Same applies to cancer. I know. The truth angers. The only reason why the Gerson therapy wasn't accepted was because nobody can make money without selling a drug. Absolute greed.
  15. There is some length contraction and time dilation.. and from that some.. comes an "idea". Do you have scientific evidence? An interview with you and Einstein? My point is that theory comes from an idea and so does experiment. Same poop, different pile. My point was to not treat einstein(selfish woman abuser) as a God while other inventors deserve more credit. Give credit where it is due.
  16. All the times.. I don't understand the closed-minded views of the majority of people and their general LACK of morals and their sick selfish perversion of controlling the world as they are a God. Like doctors that keep telling Cancer patients that Cancer can't be cured while Max Gerson was curing Cancer in the early 1900's by curing the underlying vitamins and minerals deficiencies with natural foods and the body cured itself! Why is the truth always suppressed for greed? Greedy humans without morals gotta stop playing God by controlling everything and calling it science. Free the farm animals and the world will flourish just fine! (general view, not a personal attack against anyone)
  17. Hypocrisy is the result of being brainwashed. The truth is that the majority of people are easy to brainwash, even some scientists, like I always say... follow your own personal values and above all.. think for yourself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  18. +100000000 LOL at the last part. So... The sun and clouds length contraction and time dilation are NOT relative to the stationary observer as they move through the horizon? Michael Faraday didn't need math. The math needs to be created in the first place from...? Intuition? Einstein shouldn't be given whole credit to GPS. GPS is a compendium of theories from various inventors. Say goodbye to GPS without the radio.
  19. I should have been more clear... Why would anyone need to man-write(formulate a model for the effects) a natural occurance as the Sun or clouds passing through the horizon are examples of length contraction and time dilation ?
  20. We are still evolving.. there is no tigers to eat the weak. The weak over-run the planet. Your comment made my point. Humans manipulate chemicals by creating pesticides(toxins we spray on fruit) which damage our DNA. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18418871 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19064416 We would since scientists majorly LACK morals.
  21. Hahahhaa... I meant... Science is manipulation the evidence and the world. There's no need to hide this unethical behaviour with lots of fancy words. There is no truth from the majority of scientists because most are like chickens with their heads cut off... hence they wont stop making assumptions and manipulating everything in a negative way for the sole purpose of looking important.
  22. Hear hear!!! We will never get it... Too much egoism in society. (Not a personal attack against anyone) Why would anyone need to man-write a natural occurance as the Sun or clouds passing through the horizon? Unless they needed a ego stroke. Its strange how ignorance in your eyes is non-conformism in my eyes.
  23. You don't understand what DNA is. Let alone who made it. So this is ethically OK then... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/20/artificial-life-boots-up_n_583805.html ? Science is manipulation of the evidence and the world. No need to hide it.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.