Jump to content

I-try

Senior Members
  • Posts

    139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by I-try

  1. Did Stephen Hawkins have any other option following the discovery last year of a huge explosion emanation from within our galactic center.
  2. Studiot. Chimpanzees’ have been taught to do simple typing but I would suggest that you don’t hold your breath whilst waiting for a dog to contribute a philosophical posting on the subject TIME, despite the cravings of their stomach. To return to the subject regarding the fundamental dynamic nature of time, then as Sin Jeong-hun and Decan appear to have realised, motion implies the existence of a reality compelled to undergo displacement from a point to immediate adjacent point at a velocity involving speed and direction. In that regard, their reasoning and logic leads them in the correct direction. Also, motion comes complete with intrinsic energy, the C2 amassing of which we refer to as the mass of matter. And so on and on regarding the human concept time. With regards to the Universe being TIME-less, then surely you don’t imagine that there are super beings complete with stop watches counting the beats of the watch that conform to the displacement from point to point for every motion in the Universe. The magnitude of the parameters involved with an ability to move compels speed and direction. The human concept TIME becomes a part of that we refer to as reality, as also does a television transmitter or receiver.
  3. It is my belief that Sin Jeong-hun has provided the first part of the fundamental base for the human concept Time by his reference to movement. Deacon has supplied the second essential part by referring to change. I find that relative to the fundamental dynamic level or reality extant in the universe, oscillating motion involving reversing change of direction which encompasses all parameters involved with acceleration, and that therefore demanding the presence of energy. Apart from the above the universe is timeless. The human ability to remember and investigate past happenings, to be aware of the instant by instant changing of the present and anticipate a more distant future provides us with our concept Time.
  4. I am relatively new to the WWW and to Forums. For the last 4 month I have attempted to have my paper on the Fundamental Dynamic Nature of an Electron’s Gravity, Gravitation, Electric Charge, Inertia etceteras subjected to examination on another Forum, all to no avail because nobody on the other forum would undertake a fair reading. Due to their ignorance of my work and my inability to explain it in the confines of a post, I was unfairly banned on a charge of trying to introduce crackpot scam; the crackpot scam being that there is a fundamental difference between the phenomenon of gravity and the phenomenon responsible for gravitation. In that regard, is there anybody on this Forum sufficiently interested in fundamental dynamic physics and willing to assist me by a reading? If there are such persons, I am willing to attempt to answer all questions or inquiries provided they are not simply statements demanding that I provide mathematical explanation or references to corroborating papers that support my beliefs other than those presently extant in the scientific literature. Complements of a moderator on the other Forum, I am able to provide a WWW reference to my published work. The paper consists of 68 pages and it would only require a reading of the first 10 to 12 pages to gain an understanding of the principals on which the provided information is based. I have read the rules of this Forum; also the definition of what is unkindly termed a crackpot, and whilst I agree that there are many who are inclined to excessively believe and defend that their ideas are correct, there is also a general belief that a person willing to undertake such studies of unknown phenomena has to be a crank. In that regard, my work is available for critical scrutiny without any claim that it is a flawless description of reality. Also I believe that a lack of mathematical description is not necessary a fault because all excepting extensions to that of gravity (I do not have such mathematical ability, therefore requiring the efforts of a mathematician) have already been long provided in scientific literature. The information in the paper represents 70 years of effort to understand and provide an instant by instant conceptual description of the fundamental dynamic nature of “that” we call matter, and to communicate the findings to the scientific community. It would appear that the communication is by far the hardest to achieve simply because of satisfaction with concepts now conforming to what is called Mainstream Scientific Beliefs. In that regard our technology has been well supported by the mathematics pertaining to gravitation despite the difference between gravity and gravitation. With regards my work’s ability to benefit humanity, which involves concepts such as the potential to teach the young person by the provision of an instant by instant conceptual description, exactly how the forces acting on the particles composing them change with increases in speed. The Gravitational thermodynamic effect as outlined in the paper has the ability to provide an explanation as to why the water of our great oceans can relatively rapidly undergo heating and cooling; and so on. However, by the provision of a conceptual description of the difference between gravity and gravitation, then the main purpose is in the attempt to redirect the future direction of physics away from the large amount of scarce financial resources being spent annually attempting to detect nonexistent phenomena
  5. Superfusion, in answer to your question and statements I must state that I am not a scientist; I am involved because of a lifelong love of physics. With regards to the fundamental dynamic conception of gravitation, there are now only the mathematical versions (theories) using the measured parameters such as the effects of the separation in space of an unknown concept of a phenomenon we call the mass of matter. In that regard, the use of words such as gravitational pull or the pull of gravity should not be substituted for the more noncommittal word attraction. With regards to delay, that concept is relative to our ability to respond. For a phenomenon such as a change of position of a physical entity that is activated by gravitation, the delay may be close to an infinitesimal period of that we call time. To accelerate matter, a phenomenon we refer to as force must begin to act and that involves time. With regards gravitation being a force or a natural motion, then if an object moves then the motion is natural. However, I take it that you mean that motion due to gravitation like being compelled to following Professor Einstein’s description of geodesies is therefore a natural motion. In that regard and to enforce acceleration of the mass of matter by gravitation, a displacing phenomenon we call force must be acting and that involves an increase or loss of energy. There are no freebies in physics and all changes must be payed for by energy exchange. Therefore, gravitation is the results of interference to a phenomenon, the fundamental nature of which is now unknown by mainstream science. Given the resistance to change from the present concepts ensures that all but mathematical attempts will be regarded as pseudoscience and therefore ignored.
  6. From the basic fundamental dynamic level of reality represented by a unit quantum wave, to a catastrophic collision between planets, there is a specific magnitude of that phenomenon humans recognise as force intrinsically associated with all motion. The all-embracing name given to that motion-force is energy.
  7. Santalum, my answer to your question concerning gravity and the indentation in a rubber sheet is as follows. Yes it is only an analogy that directs human thought away from having to imagine orbits to that of a visual experience. The indentation depicts a downhill situation and so to our experiences of gravitational effects. The other effect you refer to is matters inertial property that must be acting under the circumstances dynamically illustrated. For all its pretence of simplicity, practically the whole of physical reality that involves force is included in that illustration. To begin, there is the question as to what constitutes the mass of the orbiting spherical object? What is acting in an attempt to force the moving spherical object towards the central depression? What is compelling the spherical mass to orbit instead of directly rolling downhill? What is enforcing the conservation of momentum and the conservation of energy? With regards the central effect, science sends conflicting messages. On one hand there is the concept generally believed that the warping of space (what enforces the warping and constitutes the reality of space) causes the effect we call gravity to be only an illusion. On the other hand, there are the constant erroneous references to the pull of gravity or gravitational pull being stated by the Ph D from academia when appearing on TV. Concerning the inertial ability, the measurement (mathematics) regarding inertia is well documented; even so, the fundamental dynamics as to what circumstances ensures the realities of the laws of motion are not now known by academia. Some of the statement in the replies to your question state that the fundamental dynamic nature of gravity is not known and may never be known. In that regard, the fact that the General theory of Relativity is considered to be beyond reproach and therefore generally accepted as correct, provides the reason why other concepts of gravity, however logical, unless provided by a well known Ph D, will always be ignored as pseudoscience. My 16 year attempt to have my 160 page work evaluated by those in academia has been met with only two replies thanking me for the offer but stating that they cannot spare the time. If I am asked why I do not explain my concept of gravity on this thread; that is because it would require at least ten pages to do so and I am cautioned not to provide the address to obtain a free download of the published paper.
  8. I would suggest to Lowemack travelling towards the sun via a rocket travelling at .75C, that he would not be measuring the speed of light by referring to the condition of his clock. . If his rocket was equipped with a spectrometer and if it was still functioning due to its flattened state, it would be indicating that the H and K lines of calcium impacting from the sun would be displaced towards the ultraviolet, and those from earth would be equally displaced towards the read end of the light spectrum.
  9. Hello to HenryB. First, I would advise you to take it a bit easier or you will blow a gasket. Second and congratulations because you got very close. Your post title should have been Motion Time and Reality. Also, why do you substitute the word thought for that we refer to as Nature, thought is only an important part of our nature; or are you implying a religious idea that the universe has an all-over ability to think. With regards to our brain and thoughts, then yes, in the beginning all living creatures were created by the forces extant in the universe and therefore constitute a minute but wondrous part of the universe. Whatever we may be, all our inventions, miss-deeds etceteras result from the manner of our construction, and therefore are a part of the universe. With regards to the overall quality of your post, some sections display an ability to think logically, and in other sections I can only believe you were not being serious. If you are seriously interested in the fundamental dynamics of that we refer to as reality, then I would advise you as I did another member in another thread. My 160 A5 page paper titled - Matter and Associated Mysteries. An attempt to provide a base for physics – is available for free download from The General Science Journal. The subjects range from the fundamental dynamics of realty, and on through the mysteries of gravity and gravitation etceteras to the conditions at the centre of our galaxy. With regards to your post, it is obvious that you like to think, however, you would do well to cool it a bit.
  10. Hello again Ukgazzer. I see you have not availed yourself of the offer in my reply to your idea that gravity could result from electromagnetic energy. In your reply to Insane alien directly above, you state that an object’s mass has nothing to do with its electrical and magnetic abilities. If you reduce that statement down to a particle object, you should find that the magnitude of its electrical ability if detectible, is conditioned by its mass. I would remind that in all experience, gravity always has an attracting effect.
  11. Ukgazzer I have read your attempt to suggest that gravity could result from the actions of an electromagnetic field. I have also read the replies. And although I commend you for your effort, your concept is incorrect for the reasons given by those whom replied. However, you should not be disheartened because there is a famous and highly respected statement relegating our concept of gravity to that of an illusion. Even so, you got close for the reason that I believe that the correct fundamental dynamic concept of gravity is the reverse of your idea. Due to the manner or its creation, an electron’s electromagnetic field is the direct results of its gravitating field. This last statement could evoke scorn and contempt due to present ignorance of the fundamental dynamic phenomena that constitutes an electron. The magnitude of the magnetic field of an electron is conditional to, and only originates due to the electron’s velocity. With regards to the above statements, my paper posted at The General Science Journal runs to 160 A5 pages on Matter and Associated Mysteries – A proposed foundation for physics. Along with other phenomena, the paper attempts to explain the fundamental dynamic physical attributes of an electron; including the instant by instant explanation of the controversial statement above. Ukgazzer. If you have an ability of logical thought and the patience to read such a comprehensive paper, it can be downloaded free from the journal referred to above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.