Jump to content

superball

Senior Members
  • Posts

    119
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by superball

  1. The problem with this determination is, did the people you shared with actually apply the program, and use it on a consistent basis? Not important. If your dealing with public schooling, and the norm is no student left behind, how would you apply this premise? No student was left behind? Cheating is OK if you want to educate. By cheating with cheat sheets is wrong. By cheating the mind into thinking it is actually learning is a process leading to learning, and retention. Lets say you have 20 kids out of 40 willing to learn, and stay after school. You review the steps necessary to grasp the principles. Give 10 questions, and include in depth explanation. Answer all questions by asking any questions. Participation is part of the learning process. You had already given all the answers on the quiz. Give quiz either at the end of the class, or wait a few days adding more, and more review. You may also break it down to as little as three questions per day, and wait till the end of the week for the test. It would prove retention, and also grasping process of how it was derived. You may end up with more than you had bargained for. You will also see the progress made by the students who had participated, and those who did not. I hope you give the technique an honest try. You may find it useful, even practical bringing up the average scores of the student state wide. Sincerely super-ball
  2. your answer I believe is the best. I have car. If I may in laymen terms. You first must weigh the car at each of the four points each wheel contacts the ground. This will determine the actual center of mass, and in the perfect scenario all 4 contact points should be equal, placing the heaviest component in the center of the car, lowest to the ground. You must take care to equal all 4 contact points, and a scale is needed. Moving components of the car to locations that result in more balance. Weight distribution. The drivers weight should also be included. Its not enough to have a low center of mass if there are points that are very disproportionate to the other points of contact. Another factor when relating to roll, or G force around turns, Is to heavily modify the chassis, so it becomes as rigid as possible. Such as connecting the struts by use of strut tower brace. The rear suspension by traction bars, and also the length of the chassis with sub frame connection bars. That should get you a more stable platform. then you must determine what springs to use for launch, so you don't have excessive wheel spin under acceleration. I hope that helps you build a killer rod. Cheers super-ball
  3. I do believe you are correct in the first case, higher propagation through denser material. It is when the wave reaches a more liquified medium, that the propagating wave is dampened. Damping effect. In the first case you may have trust type quake, because the energy has someplace to go, and that is a more sever Earth quake. Seismic wave The S-wave moves as a shear or transverse wave, so motion is perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation: S-waves are like waves in a rope, as opposed to waves moving Wikki "through a slinky, the P-wave. The wave moves through elastic media, and the main restoring force comes from shear effects. These waves do not diverge, and they obey the continuity equation for incompressible media: The shadow zone of a P-wave. S-waves don't penetrate the outer core, so they're shadowed everywhere more than 104° away from the epicenter (from USGS) Its name, S for secondary, comes from the fact that it is the second direct arrival on an earthquake seismogram, after the compressional primary wave, or P-wave, because S-waves travel slower in rock. Unlike the P-wave, the S-wave cannot travel through the molten outer core
  4. Greetings all, I have been looking into the viable concepts of the use of asymmetrical magnets, and there is plenty of good information on the subject, even acceptable patents, and processeing. That sign wave you see is a moving magnetic field, and is a valid concept for the development of non rotational magnetic fields. Included are some links. cheers. http://www.stfc.ac.uk/astec/22488.aspx http://www.google.co...epage&q&f=false http://www.google.co...epage&q&f=false These are just a few to get you started.
  5. Greetings all. there are allot of great posts I read through. I recently did a study in my own thought process relating to cognitive thinking. The study of analyzing my own process of behavior, and patterns of drawing on what I had learned in my younger years. I am happy to see teachers looking for a way to solve the problems of higher education on a high school level. A time in a persons life that does not allow for play. We all like to play, and are sometimes preoccupied struggling for memory retention in our later years. For me, I had struggled very much through high school, less time for homework, play time, work time, free time, and relationship. What comes later in life are Social skills, character, sports, hobbies home life, parents etc.. I truly believe, higher education needs to be introduced in the early years of the students development. To this day I still struggle with the basics, because of the preoccupied mind. It is well know in the early development stages a child mind performs like a marshmallow, absorbing and expanding, learning language, and taking in there surroundings. Curiosity, and learning is highly increased, creating life long connections to retrieve information in there later years. If we could blow up the mind like a balloon in that stage of development, many more nerve connections, and pathways will develop. This would allow for shrinkage as we get older, for memory retention. smile. Second languages, musical arts, mathematics, you name it. The process will lead to high society, virtue, etiquette, social skills, and much more. You may try the word association game, because what options are you left with? For me as a 9th grade high school student, my favorite class was earth science, although I had struggled with history, language, social study, and you guessed it mathematics. So yea, early introduction would indeed help the situation. Life long skills could also be introduced allowing for stronger more technology based working class. Open book testing may prove to be a viable resource, enabling the high school student to grasp the concepts needed for future retrieval of information. When I had taken a class for a drivers course the lecturer had gone over every question, and answers that would be on the test allowing for questions from the student driver. I have to admit I pass with flying colors, and retained the information also. You may try setting a time after school, 45 minutes over the course of a week to test my proposal, and learn if student score higher on closed testing averages. Sincerely super-ball.
  6. wiki "When this field is instead studied using quantum electrodynamics, it is seen that the plates do affect the virtual photons which constitute the field, and generate a net force, either an attraction or a repulsion depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates." This is my confusion, virtual photon constitutes the field. I know The typical example is of two uncharged metallic plates in a vacuum, without any external electromagnetic field. If I had arranged the plates properly, it said there is also a repellent force. I have placed my plates, or spheres in the electric field, arranged them so they repel, and accelerate them together. My question, is there an increase in flux in the field or density of the charge if they get very close? Can you point me in the right direction please. Were should I be looking to find induction of two bodies in outer space like I have described? Is there a change of flux between two given objects accelerating together, leading to energy increasing on both spheres? Thanks so much for your help. sincerely super-ball
  7. Hmm, I was talking about only 2 particles at the time, you introduced a variable. One particle the Higgs Boson, the other the mysterious gravitational energy particle if one did exist. I have more questions about neutrino, and I could not elaborate on the reason why they are uncharged, although they do have spin, so we have that. Perhaps they are a perfect insulated particle. Honestly, I don't have a clue why. mass=energy, anti particles = energy, neutrinos = energy, all of these particles are spinning is the common denominator. all exist within the medium, or electric field. I am happy I found the classical physics forum, or else i would really be in trouble. cheers Respectfully super-ball.
  8. Greetings, I have been looking into the same problems you have. Sorry if I do not stick with conventional wisdom on this, its good to know your own body, and relate these changes to a possible cause. Asthma is one thing, allergy is another. for better definition assume respiratory conditions are increasing. For me, I have noticed the atmosphere is producing copious amounts of ozone, several less well know causes can be accounted for. Lets face it, the nuclear disaster in japan is a main contributor. Radioactive material drifting around the entire world. What does radio active mean? It means it is releasing energy. The interaction in our atmosphere, causes a response. water vapor in the form of cloud cover gets heated, heat causes it to evaporate quickly, leading to less cloud cover were the heating is very high. Perhaps the drought in Texas is related to that, the radiation transforms the atmosphere leading to a huge spike in low level ozone, you may not like this answer, but it is scientifically sound. Other causes an increase in natural gas, and methane bubbling up from pockets under ground that have reached the surface. an earth quake, or drilling in search of fuel may release the trapped pockets of gas. This gets even more dangerous, as it is also exposed to solar rays, and even the radiation coming from nuclear plants that fail, nuclear testing, under ground testing etc. This is not per-say the (only factors) to respiratory problems on a global scale, but is becoming evident, a main contributor. Independent study, and sampling of the air you breathe and the drinking water being consumed Is necessary for determining cause. The amount of tolerances a body can handle is determined not by the individual, but by the quantity a species can safely tolerate. If the quantity of these very dangerous by products find its way hovering above your home, you can be sure the clean breathable oxygen is reduced. It may even lead to brain damage, or permanent damage to the respiratory system. My own researches verify that. Sincerely , super-ball.
  9. lol that is very funny .... drinks are on me cheers. my response"How did they do that? with smoke and mirrors, flashy cards, and lots, and lots of assertion." Cheers, its time for tea..
  10. This is difficult to determine if we used the year 2011. If we go back to 2010, 6,7 or greater quakes are increasing in frequency. If we go back to 2009 we have a somewhat stable environment. When dealing with 2010, prediction was very intuitive, and there was found to be a cause. In 2011, predictions may be determined on a time sensitive base if we look at 2010. Earthquakes are generally not time sensitive. random quakes are a result of stress on plates that are in motion, assuming the earth is in a stable condition. In 2011 the earth is quickly becoming destabilized, and an outcome for future predictions based on the time frame given for 2010 will lead to a higher degree of accuracy. The progression of the destabilizing crustal shifts for 2011 will clearly show an increase of frequency, and more powerful quakes, leading to the next great earthquake expected within the next 4 months. closer to the end of march is my prediction, although it may be sooner December 2011 to February 2012. January 2011 will have a high probability for 7.0 to 8.0 earthquakes. If you had thought earthquake prediction is unlikely, then by looking at a graph of 2010, you may prove with accuracy time sensitive relations for 2011, and also 2012. People claiming to be able to use astronomical charts in the past found it most difficult. today we have reason to state otherwise. Volcanic eruptions are no different for 2011, and 2012 many will be erupting by mid January, and continue for a few months there after. You may find a chart for 2010, and determine these eruptions most accurately for the next 2 to 3 years. Nothing is left by chance in this case, so its time to be prepared. The progression will accelerate more so after destabilization. So yea, its not looking good. sorry I had no answer for your question on quantity of quakes in a 10 day period, but i hope your concern may lead to a better understanding of the process of torque induced precession. It has been found to be a progression of axial shift. Over a 3 to 5 year period starting in early months of 2010. The magician does not tell his secrets, but in this case science does. I am a scientist, not a magician. respectfully superball cheers
  11. Greetings, I have not done to much study in this field, so I had some questions also. I had assumed it to be spinning, in wiki the description of the boson said this. "the Higgs boson is expected to be in a class of particles known as scalar bosons. (Bosons are particles with integer spin, and scalar bosons have spin)" So yea something is spinning. I asked a few questions related to induction to aid in my understanding. Is there a particle boson? Not yet according to wiki. best ask the experts on that one. Spin dictates energy IMO, because there needs to be a changing magnetic field in order for a changing electric field. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/61077-the-higgs-and-a-gravitational-field-assumption/
  12. Greetings all I have a few questions on the subject please. from wiki "In quantum field theory, the Casimir effect and the Casimir–Polder force are physical forces arising from a quantized field. The typical example is of two uncharged metallic plates in a vacuum, like capacitors placed a few micrometers apart, without any external electromagnetic field. In a classical description, the lack of an external field also means that there is no field between the plates, and no force would be measured between them. My question is does this effect demonstrate a force that may be consider as energy from the quantized field or vacuum energy that is not observed based on mass, and distance relating to energy by principle of the inverse square law? Assuming these bodies are in outer space, and the electric field is changing due to movement of the bodies cutting the local flux lines of space. They have a charge, and it is increasing as they come closer together. I hope I did not complicate its meaning, I am looking for energy derived from inductive forces. When this field is instead studied using quantum electrodynamics, it is seen that the plates do affect the virtual photons which constitute the field, and generate a net force, either an attraction or a repulsion depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates. Question, if I assumed a repulsion force, based on the inverse square law. Does the mass of two bodies pressing closer together induce a charge on the other body, or are both bodies equally increasing in energy? I am not sure I am using the terminology correctly, but could we say gravity depends on mass, and the locality of any two objects dictate the value of energy relating to this force? Is it a inductive force of gravity, or is it the energy in the medium that is always present? electric field sincerely super-ball
  13. This is a question for the reader, it is used to test current models. It is used to determine related factors. It is thought to be polluted with irrelevant information. It is thought to have dismissed natural self evident factors. It is thought to have been confusing. It is thought to have not answered to a high degree all factors related to the present day. How was it determined by what came before, and what came after. By assuming the model was functional in the first place, and by determining the model has been in a evolving manner polluted with irrelevant amendments. By the continued use of amendments, leading to confusion.. Another axiom of course. Does global warming models list these factors in a cause, and effect chain? From an observable point of view are current models functional? Do they explain to a high degree all of the main causes in order of importance? What is assumed to be self evident? A Cause and effect chain answers, or explain questions related to specific change. Keep in mind the model is not related to a global warming process. Instead it is used to determine the outcome of cause and effects related. The foundation of change in a system is categorized in a cause and effect chain. Observable, testable, factual. Open for amendments. I thank you for your willingness to help. I agree more is needed, I really did not think about the Q. & A. My wording, and ideas of methodology may have not been clear. First It is a simple model. Second cause and effect chain is used for all determining factors. Third Tested for truth and functionality. Perhaps, because of my Questioning process others find it aloof. Q: When we describe a system effected by change, how do you determine, and go about explaining these changes in a scientific manner? Include, and determine the state of changes occurring in the system leading to a functional physical working model. My question was used to determine these factors. The methodology, I had used the axiom assuming all is true. I had tested for a high degree of accuracy. All statements used for explaining changes by categorizing the fundamental laws of nature. Change was determined by cause, and effect including only what is not assumed, but instead what is widely known. Factor that are less widely known are also included, and gives answers to questions current models lack. by use of axiom assuming all statements are true, and then by testing it for truth. by using well known principles, explaining a cause for a given effect. by keeping it very simple, including self evident or well known principles. by explaining other less known causes for a given effect. A trend can be used to determine a cause. True, or false? Every thing in nature, everything included in a system has a generating effect on another system. You might say mainstream global warming scientist look at a completely closed system, ignoring self evident principles, and observation. I hope this is sufficient although it seems to be very repetitive. Thank you for your help, respectfully super-ball.
  14. Take methane for instance, natural gas, or crude oil. you better believe it does exactly what you had said. swimming in it kills life, drinking it kills life, and breathing it causes brain damage. I am very sad because of these fact, considering its going to get much worse in the next couple years. Testing water, and air independently, or 3rd party is the only solution to the problem. Best of regards, super-ball.
  15. well you gave me a possible solution I had been looking for. Cause of red shift in this case it may be something other than expansion of universe. I aim my scope over there, as it passes by a high gravitational mass, even Jupiter it may result in a red shift. Some one may have assumed there must be a cause leading to dark matter, but the gravitation lensing may occur even when dealing with a small body or mass. the returning echo can be absorbed. Not good enough, try this instead. when light is reflected ,or even direct light from a source it travels a small given distance,and it spreads out in all directions. the farther you go the more spread. So yea there is light spreading away from the observer from any source in all directions. The return trip, or echo did the same exact thing spherical waves spreading in both directions. Radar works exactly in the same way. The shift can be accounted for with simple tests. You may need 20 miles to do that, taking a reading by aiming at a concrete wall, and waiting for the return, same test on an iron wall. Metal absorbs that type of wave, (iron nickle) so now you have a decrease in energy on the return, the energy wave is also spreading in both directions a red shift. This is what gravitational lensing really looks like. Observe the smoking gun, not one inbound object, see at least 2 objects. I wonder why the energy bands are facing the wrong direction.. Torque induced Precession. Take a look how gravity waves over lapp another gravity wave causing a monstrous hill. Induction causes expansion. Holy cow, cheers.. Push the green button now you have one. Time to break out the tinfoil hats.
  16. LOL some body needs to swim was my first thought but, now I see the possibility. going= P and T, hallway there the thief jumps off, and drowns leading to a solution LOL no that's not it. Police man tied Thief by a rope to the raft lol, nope. LOL tie a rope to the raft and pull the boat back empty heheh maybe? M + D first trip. D goes back D still in raft Bonkers...
  17. I have one more trick if you like math, my sister taught this to me when i was like 12 years old. Card trick, take a deck of cards, ask a person to take out 3 cards that equal 10. aces are one, ten jack queen king is not allowed. you need the whole deck to pull it off. they don't show there cards, and they do not go back in the deck. When done you will tell the numbers on the cards only. 1. You need to master this, because it depends on speed of flipping, so you can not look like your counting cards. 2. Take the remaining pile in your hand, and flip the first card. if its a 10 flip another card on top quickly, 10 jack queen king is ten. 3. If not a ten, flip a new pile. you may end up with a bunch of piles by the end of the trick. 4. every time a ten comes up flip a card on top, every time 2 piles of cards equals ten, flip a card on both piles. 5. If you end up with only one card left at the end, make a new pile. 6. now you have a bunch of piles at the end, remove 2 piles that add up to 10. there should be 3 piles left that don't add up to ten. If one of the last 3 piles is a 3 add 7 and get 10, remove the pile this means he has a seven in is hand, the remaining 2 piles will be an 8 and a 9. therefore he has a 2, and a ace in his hand the power of 10. enjoy. remove all the piles before you tell what cards he is holding. cheers.
  18. lol oh yea its 4 thanks.. been a long time since i did that one. I forgot to test it. No it was not goggled, if you had used 4 lines it kind of looks like a kite. that definitely works also, should have been 4 lines my bad.
  19. 11/20/11 Prediction for 6.7 or better, earthquake location ring of fire. estimated delay up to 9 days. 11/29/11
  20. I have one to pull on your friends, ask them this question, you need a visual aid to do it. If Billys mom has three sons, and one is named Penney, hold a penny in palm, and one is named quarter, show quarter, then what is the third sons name? You get four straight lines, you must connect all the dots without lifting your pencil. . . . . . . . . .
  21. I Had read something Maxwell described as adding another dimension, I think he called it the Z axis, in laymen terms everything can cast a shadow. I don't know what the 5th dimension would look like, hypothetically gravity or some kind of spin energy, or a doughnut.. just make mine jelly. Cheers.
  22. Hey whats up, thanks for your time, I was thinking it could happen, because if we continue to ingest silicon through solution, life would eventually find a way. Food, and drink should never be packaged in plastic containers, especially due to the leaching factor you had suggested. Do you think arsenic, and silicon can combine? I am not a chemist, but I think nature may have already shared this secret? How about carbon based crystalized life? Any way time will tell, just don't have the time to wait. cheers.
  23. I think it was very refreshing. Only a physicist could have done it, I like it, in fact I love it. It gives quantity, gives formula, the number of supporters is irrelevant. It cover so much information.. I have an experiment for you, if you had balance, or scale, and added some gaseous material on both sided so that it was in perfect balance. On one side we have earth, man and co2, and plane air the closed system analogy. on the other side we insert the same material and call that nature the open system analogy. On the open side i suggest energizing the material with laser light, blue, red, green spectrum. If the balance remains the same on both sides then the experiment is a failure. if the energy introduced tips the scale it would suggest nature is the most powerful factor. cheers. It would take thousand, and thousands of dollars worth of precision equipment. I think it could work in theory, but you always have the drawing board to fall back on. If all fails you will still end up with a big pile of o3 so you can get your money back. cheers.
  24. I offered a trues, evolution first, then we can chat.cheers.

  25. Greetings all, what a wonderful forum, what a wonderful life.

    I do the experiments, I love the work, I love the job, and I love the challenges.

    Everything in moderation, cheers.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.