Jump to content

pulkit

Senior Members
  • Posts

    660
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pulkit

  1. It was a part of my first year course on metric spaces (atleast we were supposed to know the result of the theorem-not its derivation)

    Now in the second year its cropped up again in my discrete mathematics course..

     

    On second thought, I can understand why you may not have heard of it, the course I did in my first year is actually a post graduate course that was only a couple of years ago included in our under graduate curriculum (and then being in comp sci meant that we had to chose the more difficult of the two maths courses on offer namely the one mentioned above)

  2. hmm' date=' you could do a nitrogen trichloride synth, then oxidize it, a bit of magnesium shards (NOT POWDERED) and a little iodine with a solution of conc perchloric acid, barium nitrate, calcium and cobalt carbonate, sodium fluoaluminate, lithium carbonate, and strontium carbonate and nitrate.

     

    the above would cause a powerful immediate explosion, with a very hot multicolored flame lasting a good long time afterwards.[/quote']

     

    Oh my dear God !! :eek:

     

    Have yu actually EVER done this ??

    Where on Earth did you get all that stuff from ?

  3. It seems like this something like "atomic units" that was taught to us while we did quantum mechanics. We definde these units by taking value of fundamental constants like h bar, electronic charge, 4 pi epsilon not etc. all to be equal to unity. Once we did this, suddenly the Schrodinger equation took a very beautiful and simple form. We also came up with some nice units to define length on the atomic scale.

     

    When you work in such a system the chances of manual error reduce greatly and calculations are massively simplified.

  4. I think a major factor going against your idea is the cost factor. Even if the materials needed are cheaper than the conventional metals used, the manufacturig process itself would need to change. This would not be financially viable in most if not all cases.

     

    Another factor is marketability. It won't be very easy to convince people to buy this product. A large section of the automobile industry caters to family and commercial vehicle, and for them such vehicles won't make much sense. Even attacking the single passenger market would be rather difficult. Many people would feel a lot safer (I am talking about the mental attitude here) in a metallic shell rather than a flimsy rubbery one.

     

    Lastly, I am not so convinced that a more flexible material would be safer in a collision situation. The force should be distributed over the body of the vehicle and not be transfered to the individual inside. Why would a material like the one mentioned, help in doing this ?

  5. i cant believe that thas a theorem name. its just this

     

    a less than b ' date=' and b less than a implies a=b. i have seen this before for like showing that a set A=B. but can't believe a trivial thing like this should have a name[/quote']

     

    I find it strange that you are doing a major in maths and you haven't heard of this theorem. Its one of the first things you do when you start axiomatic set theory.

  6. When you say elliptical cylider, yet you know that its a 4-dimensional figure, exactly which property/properties of the ellipse or cylider do you generalise to the fourth dimension. It seems easy to carry forward spheres into n dimensions, but how do you carry forward cylinders and ellipses ?

  7. Dammit people, radiation is nothing to be worried about... or maybe it is. :) Just don't keep too strong gamma-stuff near you, and DON'T, I mean DON'T keep alpha-radiators near aluminum or beryllium. They kick off neutrons, and neutron radiation is something not to be played with. Beta and alpha radiators aren't too dangerous by temselves, just don't eat or inhale them.

     

    Do you acctually have radioactive stuff in your collection ?

  8. The best way to write experiments is to break down your report into various sub-headings like : Aim, Procedure, Observations etc.

    And then you MUST report everything you observe and also try and put down everything in points and do not write long paragraphs - nobody likes to read those.

  9. In school, I remember being told that some of the lanthanides are used to increse workability of metals at high temperatures and are thus used in such alloys. This invoked two questions :-

     

    a) How expensive are these lanthanides to get hold of and how much is it possible to obtain ?

     

    b) I was also taught of their general extraction procedures, but never told if there were any commercial mines / quarries where the actual ore / minerals may be found. Where would one go looking for these minerals, i mean geographical area ?

     

     

    Note : As far as Thorium is concerned it is available from a particular type of sand that is available in considerable quantities on beaches in a southern state in India. I don´t know of any areas where Uranium is found naturally.

  10. Thorium and Uranium are not lanthanides, they are actinides. Most of those are radioactive and I wouldn´t want to handle them :)

     

    I was curious about stuff like Promethium, Praseodymium, Lanthanum, Neodymium, Europium, Gadolinium, Terbium, Holium etc. etc.

     

    Cerium ions are commonly used oxidiising agents aren´t they ?

  11. We still get mercury thermometers here. Whenever someone wants mercury, they go ahead and buy a couple of thermometers.

    Magnesium is extremely easy to get, we had lots in our school lab.

    Where do you get Gallium and Indium ?

     

    Does anyone have a pure sample of Arsenic ?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.