Jump to content

ydoaPs

Moderators
  • Posts

    10567
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by ydoaPs

  1. as you quoted most of the courses aren't engineering, they are physics
  2. it's not that it's inconvenient, it's that mony will be different by the time we can explore the universe. it might even be like startrek where there is no money (although i seriously doubt it) u are forgetting, not only would we learn what we would if we found similar life, but we would learn about thier metabolic proccesses and genetic material and all the other stuff we already know about earth life
  3. for english, "Word Clues" and "Tooth And Nail"
  4. we aren't going to be roaming accross the universe looking for life any time soon, so lets just foreget about money for now. yes, we would learn if we found identical life, but we would learn vastly more if it were different. wat better way to find different life than to look in a different place?
  5. how do you know it isn't possible if you haven't looked. there are OLD programs on the Science Channel that were talking about the life in lava, so take it up with them.
  6. forget about money for now. lets use an analogy: how much are you gonna learn from 2+x=5 after u did it a few billion times?
  7. Most of the courses for astronautical engineering major are physics, so I'd have to disagree with you there
  8. y look for life that is like us?if we want to learn about life don't you think we should look for other kinds? u said all amino acids and wat would fall to the mantle. plenty of energy to get life started and all the material in the right place. and you don't seem to understand that there are microbes lava and permafrost. and other such extremes. there is a multicellular organism that can even live through a nuclear blast.
  9. well, u could talk to them anyway. and by that thinking, I have a bachelor's degree in Astronautical Engineering and I teach Physics and Algebra. try Fabric of The Cosmos, it came out this year
  10. Appearently he does. If he is a researcher/teacher, then maybe he could talk to Witten or Greene himself.
  11. you just illustrated my point. even if we don't find anything it wouldn't mean its not there. it doesnt even have to be on a planet or moon; it could be on an asteroid or comet.
  12. read The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene it tells how it does all of that and more. it even has a history of strin/m-theory.
  13. is that better? now it has a warning. Dark matter and dark energy aren't the same thing. Dark matter is probably planets, asteroid belts, moons, comets, undiscovered black holes, ect.
  14. how doesn't it explain much? it tells y there r three families of elementary particles. it explains what really happens in particle accelerators. it explains where the properties of said elementary particles come from. it even combines quantum mechanics and relativity.
  15. thats not quite analogous, but I'll admit it's close. still, ruling out something because you've never seen anything like it before is stupid. say an alien race is looking for life and comes to our system. Every terrestrial planet it has seen has had no life. so it passes Earth and goes to Jupiter. That is what JaKiri we should do exept we haven't even looked for life.
  16. I was thinking the same thing about you. I never said that this thread was fact. actually, I said the opposite.
  17. no, its a theory. it is string THEORY.
  18. I didn't say "hey, this is scientific law: cosmologists are wrong" I just presented a perfectly logical and probably true idea that was attained the same way the theory of relativity was.
  19. thats like if all you see are birds, you assume life can't exist underwater
  20. what do you mean fixed?
  21. who is to say where? wat makes you qualified to say tha life can't exist in a gas giant? even if we did look and didn't find anything, it wouldn't prove that life can't exist there.
  22. do you want me to get some cosmologist to do a lot of math just for you to consider the idea?
  23. according to theory, there is only one kind that the dimensions are curled into. they have yet to pick one. calibi-yau shapes have been in mathematics for ages. there are infinite calibi-yau shapes, therefore an infinite number of posibilities. they just haven't picke one yet
  24. I was incorrect in my last statement. I can prove it. I just don't have enough money or time. Even if I had enough money, I, along with you and several generations to come, will have been long dead by the time the results come in.
  25. there are infinite variations of calibi-yau space. it depends on the theory. it is to cancel out the tachyon frequencies
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.