thedarkshade

But this doesn't answer his question and it's kidna off-topic.

have a look at post #5:-)

I assume so, but toward the poles of the center.

But that is no proof that intelligence is not determined by genetic factors. Maybe we still don't have the technology needed to do that. Keep in mind that we know the structure and function of just a few genes compared to their overall number. Besides, if intelligence is not determined so much from genetic factors, what could have possibly influenced in Newton's intellectuall brilliancy? What outside factor? Apples and trees?

Dude, ligh is curved becuase it is going through curved space, which is a manifestation of gravity."Gravity manifests itself as the curving of spacetime." -swansont Is that relevant in determing whether you post was true or not?

even in a rep thread:rolleyes:

This is how I see it. Besides, there is no cis-trans isomery in pent-1-ene (excuse the drawing)

Unfortunately (or not?) these kind of games seem to train brain (rhymes I know:-)) to process more data per time. Thats another reason why I kill so much>

and also it they're despreate to make friends

17/m/KS part-time student, part-time teacher:)

I disrespectly disagree. Individually, I think intelligence is determined more from genetical factors. If you don't agree, please explain why becuase I'm really interested to see your opinion on this:-)

Why not!

Addition

What about as an individual matter?

Greeting to all of you who have joined the forum since my last general greeting. A warm welcome to SFN! We have fun too here, you know:-p Shade!

Who's you favorite character? Mine is Leonard. He's almost as smart as Sheldon() and he's a cool guy too. Then Howard rocks too. IMO he's probably the backbone of the comedy.

That a common thing to almost all of science, but each branch of it requires a different approach. Biology and Chemistry sure do differ from one another in crucial points, and biology-realted problmes need differnet aproach from chemistry-realted ones. But yeah, you're, biochem would encompass what he seems to like doing:-)

This is definitely my most favorite comedy ever! Not only makes you lol, but it also shows you the kind of geeky bastard modern scientist are becoming (no offense). Have you seen any bit of it? What do you think about it?

But you do realize that it's double hard work too (it didn't work for me ) dont u...

But isn't that (more or less) what they're trying to do, and that the test is about?

I presume not. The orbital pattern is determined by the nature of electrostatic forces, and a neutron has no such propertries. But there are differences anyhow. "Bonds involving deuterium and tritium are somewhat stronger than the corresponding bonds in light hydrogen, and these differences are enough to make significant changes in biological reactions (see heavy water)." - Wiki If my answer above is correct, then yeah! I don't think so. That would involve a change in mass (an increase of course), but the charge wouln't change (AFAIK).

Ummm..... thanks:embarass:

Tha's a big word you know! It won't appear don't worry. We know that from conservation of energy (since matter is energy)! There is absolutely no reason why we should give this more privilege than the other countless problems since deals with.It indeed is a striking thing to even just think about, but that makes is just another problem for science, nothing more!

I think so too. IMO, a real IQ test should not just take into consideration what your answer for a problem is, but also the way you aproach problems (which I think is even more important).

Really? Have you worked that out? If so, I'd really appreciate if you explained that in more details, becuase I assume it would require a lot of energy.