Jump to content

amanda more

Senior Members
  • Posts

    180
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by amanda more

  1. !

    Moderator Note

    Amanda, we're not here to trade suggested personal attacks and banters, we're here to discuss ideas and share our knowledge and opinions with one another. Stick to the topic, and please understand that when people ask you to clarify, they're not attacking you, they actually want to understand what your point is. Political discussions are hard enough in a scientific forum without these "jab" posts or subtle (and not so subtle) personal attacks. Enough.

     

    My apologies. It wasn't at poster. Do -they- lack a clear message? A slightly veiled comment on one teensy tiny group in a small area of the country = they. Let's see .00001 scientologists = bummer so message is hopefully not their clear. Stay tuned.

  2. My message. This is a very egalitarian process, We are being trained to say that. (at our occupy group- hasn't been voted on)

     

     

    So here is the first take of -my- clear message of Occupy Wall Street

     

    Against violence? For Peace.

    For Food Banks.? You're for Food Stamps

    Against cops letting seniors get scammed. Against SEC allowing Wall Street to scam us.

    Don't want your vote bought. Against corporations stopping candidates with millions.

     

     

     

    Want grandchildren to not lose parents. So you are for someone,anyone to offer health access to 55 year old males.

    For jobs that then create more jobs. Against firing teachers, hurting education and causing other places they buy from, to fire employees.

    For- adding money to get jobs for living, breathing people. Against money dumped into the deadend of corporate banking balance sheets.

     

    You are for the 99%. For democracy and the common man.

     

     

    You believe in reasoning of problems and doing the result. Not "those that run us" ignoring answers and grabbing cash for themselves instead.

     

    For- using above means to avoid Great Depression 2 and if no one does anything and it happens, in favor that we are prepared with food programs in place, just in case.

     

     

     

    Get real. Police the laws we have. Stop bad laws and get dollars for prosperity. Prevent catastrophe.

  3. Also known as clear communication.

    As farout as personal attacks have been where various terms have been used against me(although others are quick to take offense at things like terms like "elitism.") and I do appreciate the calling on certain terms by others, this thread has yet to be hijacked totally by those jazzed by all the conspiracy stuff nonsense.

     

    This group would actually get this Analogy easily although I am showing my personal elitism by saying that:

     

    In person, as faulty, difficult, confused and messy as it appears there definately appears to be an ability to have people like the types on the internet in general with an assist to the "signal to noise ratio." Like iNow thought I was using some kind of irony or something but I do actually mean he has a clear writing style that would make a great book. His command of details benefits that project greatly. In person he would have easier grasped that.

     

    The youth are in person. Wow.

     

    So, what to do? Had another great time tonight. A good way to judge the answer to the topic question is to do this- show up. That is right -get out of your comfort zone and be a tourist at your local Occupy gathering.

     

    Here is a huge plus. We scientists and scientist types are pretty good at observing.

     

    One thorny thing. For years and years the signal was obscured by malespeak that I heard a little from one person tonight. And have heard from rightwingers, My take is that males think like fans for a side on a football team. The cheering together is what makes sense to them. Even high IQ can manage to spout terms federal reserve nationalization, fiat money, those-people who lend, you must hate the rich, it is all so complicated but then __________. The internet in spite of googling has made it easier to find likeminded souls in an almost religious ectasy of terms. My take is that this crap is a way to sound powerful as life crashes and is starting to crash for all of us.

     

    I work, in person anyway, to get the pain as the message even as I deal with the BS of the message itself..

     

    PS That Austin lady was premo. iNow may be able to articulate why what she said to the camera was not a message. Many of the rest of us found it loud and clear. Although, yes not hugely scientific in nature. You can find her- she is getting a ton of youtube hits.

     

     

     

     

     

     

  4. Apparently neither can you. If something dropped by 3% every day, the cumulative drop would not be 21%. The first drop would be 3% of the initial total. The second drop would be 3% of the previous total (the total that was already subtracted by 3% of its initial value). It worries me you neglected such elementary mathematics, yet preach about complex market analysis.

     

    A mathematician, a physicist and an engineer walk into a bar. I am saying the average person in the street has a hard time estimating what the prices would be from a drop. I am well aware of those equations but I am ok buying a toaster for $30 a month for a year and calling it $300. So there.

     

    Physicists have a hard time estimating.

     

    Ok so the DOW makes it easy. A $300 drop a day then. They don't multiply it by seven and say it is $2100. So what does a $300 drop mean? Not much. But a drop for seven days means a lot. It is around 10,000 now. Don't scream. That would then be about a 21% drop or a bear market. I am amazed, I am doing complex market analysis?

     

    I'd love if there are quants who would jump in.

     

    Reason: After the novelty wears off the wall street types will continue to ignore the reality they actually see and the reality they actually admit to themselves is true and continue to fund the craziness in congress tanking the economy causing a crash.

  5. Actually no, a 3% drop in a day does not imply a 21% drop in 7 days. That's a wild extrapolation with no reasoning to support it. Why should we expect the market to drop like that? BTW, seven sequential 3% drops means about a 19.2% drop.

     

    There are a whole bunch of companies increasing dividends and buying back stock — that requires cash payouts. In 2008/2009 companies were slashing dividends to conserve cash. So these companies are comfortable enough with the economic outlook to commit to using more of their cash flow to return it to shareholders. Not something you do if you are worried about an economic collapse.

    This has to be as much a shock to you at me as it is to me. A $30 a month payment for ten months is not something most people can understand. They can't add a zero. Especially those under thirty.

     

    So you and I can do a worse case scenario and multiply 7 times 3%. They can't do that. With significant figures a 3% drop can vary from 2.5 to 3.4% so taking it at 3.00% is not correct. Although yes I am aware of the equation and reasoning you used but perhaps you can't abide estimates.

     

    Reason The average American educated investor can do so little thinking in an arithmetic way that numbers that are released are meaningless.

     

     

  6.  

     

     

    You have to be really kidding here. Nothing about the stock market. It is extremely obtuse to continually play unhearing regarding examples.

     

    People under 30 the calculator generation don't do what you and I do. Unless they are scientifically trained they have a hard time imagining what a 3% drop in a day can mean. It would be a surprise that it is 21% drop in 7 days (actually this is close enough for those who would quibble on the exactness.)

     

    They think so little in simple math they are perplexed and surprised. You and I can see a graph and notice it is varying around a mean. That is totally incomprehensible.

     

    I can also be as obtuse as many in this thread. For instance, it would never occur to me in a million years that anyone would sell short on anything I would post. If I could predict the future like that I would be rich.

     

    They have delayed implementation of the 1200 trillion dollars in derivatives legislation. When that hits the fan which companies are even profitable. In a dark market- who would know that? Now that guy would predict the future. He, they will profit.

     

    I suppose when it does -- the blame, just as it fell on homeowners will now fall on college students. (occupy wall street) Scapegoating has to be older even than grandparents throwing their offspring to the wolves.

     

    Reason- Half the population is addicted to pornography or jazzy pornographic like statements in whatever general concepts and finds no ability to use their intellect on reality. This inability to think straight is an addiction which prevents them from controlling outrageous behavior among themselves and their peers. Reality that doesn't turn them on lets them turn a deaf ear to crashing economies and actually thinking about scenarios and deductive reasoning regarding available facts. They are unable to be real enough to be honest which of course when enough are like that crashes Wall Street.

     

    ps you are now getting scary

     

     

     

  7. "Be specific. You and the well-intentioned but painfully naive hippies playing frisbie and doing yoga on Wall Street right now sound like a tribe of bloody fools who are screaming at a casino for taking money they voluntarily fed into the slot machine. Either figure out what specifically you're requesting and form a plan to attain it, or STFU already. " from iNow

    "You're focused purely on emotional response, and that's not reaching me and others like me" from iNow

    So, football fan enthusiasm or disparaging remarks- well that must be analytical but any enthusiasm gushing for peace or light comedy- that is emotional.

    The real world does need for all of us to care. That is an emotion. You can decide to own it. And/or -you- may want to reach others.

    Is this post dispassionate enough?

  8. Part of me wonders if you're just being intentionally silly, but the realistic part is saddened by the realization that you're probably serious, and hence a very clear example of the problem noted in the OP.

     

     

    "Part of me wonders if you're just being intentionally silly, but the realistic part is saddened by the realization that you're probably serious, and hence a very clear example of the problem noted in the OP."

     

    As I've mentioned elsewhere IQ has no correlation to vice.

     

    So high IQ can fall for just as much stupid behavior as the low IQ.

     

    Where is your book? You could write a textbook you are so good at chapter and verse. You can check your bookmarks for the links to above. I think you are (as would be normal for either cogs in the wheel in middle management or struggling small business owners) overwhelmed. Take a deep breath.

     

    Keep Austin crazy. No need to seek it everywhere else.

     

    It is so simple. Everyone I know yells at their TV sets. Finally we are talking to each other and the powers that be.

     

    Nine tenths of life is just showing up. So, Occupy wall Street.

  9. My point was that, in this situation, it was the mechanic that both diagnosed and fixed the problem. In OWS, are they actually diagnosing the problem? IMO, no. They recognize a problem exists. They have offered no details and no solutions that anybody on this thread has been able to cite. All I've seen so far is an accusation of being an elitist and a fallacious claim that I called people stupid, but when one has no facts to present, one is tempted to attack the person.

     

    "I've seen what happens when the "common man" gets "his" way in politics." <---From you

    For a retort to work I need to get into the habit of carrying the quote with you.

    I suppose the elitist one percent must really be the common man because you imply only the common man holds paradoxical views. Ever heard of let's go to war and cut everyone's taxes? The rich can find a few of the sainted PHD's to follow the money and say all kinds of crap. So being a scientist doesn't equal sainthood and to disparage the electorate is yes, elitist.

    As I suggested if you hold those views you may want to peruse Plato. I wonder though if he might have considered physicists as one would mechanics who can't really reason fully while we should make the philosopher, king. And if you still have a superiority complex then own it and be happy with your choice to be an elitist.

    I had such a great time with hundreds of people yes college but old, mothers with kids etc. The message is we want our country back. How to do it. Well add the gin, add the vermouth and shaken not stirred. My grandfather kept getting elected as a judge. I ,personally, and I am not currently a leader of my satellite Occupy Wall Street group, still have this distorted faith that an elite's vote is counted the same as the plebian's which gives hope. Let the people know. so, Occupy Wall Street

  10. We in the UK have practically the same consumption in litres per person per year as the Netherlands - yet our social problems are very different; perhaps there is little actual correlation with alcohol consumption? And even if there is correlation between social problems and alcohol consumption Correlation IS NOT causation; it is just as likely that those countries with deep-rooted social problems have low levels of happiness, which in turn cause their inhabitants to have a drink as the sole amelioration in a desperate existence. that is is to say that without proof it is equally probably that raised alcohol consumption is cause OR effect.

     

    Looking at the list of countries by alcohol consumption on Wikipedia - I must say that I have spent extended periods in 6 of the top 25, and found the people welcoming, friendly, and cheerful - all of which I would return to at the drop of a hat (incl R'dam Capt P!) . I have visited 4 of the bottom 20 and would only want to return to one of them - a major problem being the repressive and restrictive nature of the society (which to an extent concerned the prohibition on alcohol but mainly the disgraceful treatment of women)

     

    I wonder if UK riots had a few drunks in them. Plus the cultural aspect of hooligans at football (some I presume drinking) may have made that behavior noticeable if not acceptable.

  11. Thanks for reminding me why I was justified in my **** response.

     

    Moderator Surely this is close enough to obscenity.

     

    I'm sorry you are caught in a high stress job that even at $150,000 has not kept pace with the $85,000 that managers got thirty years ago. At least you are in Austin where mansions are cheap. Really. Those private schools were 5000 and are now 30000.

     

    Work hard and welcome back to the middle class.

     

     

     

  12. That's how I interpret "You should be put into a book about why our technological society is unable to have a lot of scientists engaged in the political process." I don't find any way to interpret it as a positive statement. I take it as saying It's my fault that I don't get the message. However, I am not willing to take responsibility for not being able to read someone else's mind. If they can't or won't articulate their grievances, I don't see how it's my fault.

     

    The problem with "Scientists would do well to meet the common man halfway. Reality is a separate thing from the hallowed halls of learning or insular research labs." is that I've seen what happens when the "common man" gets "his" way in politics. One example: I was in Oregon when they passed Measure 5, a rollback in property taxes, and the ensuing furor when police and fire departments were cut, and state university funding was slashed, because the state was suddenly responsible for funding elementary and secondary schools. The "common man" got exactly what he asked for, but didn't understand the implications. The "common man" didn't associate tax cuts with loss of services. So what I worry about is vague calls for fixing "the problem" and then no tolerance for the actual fix to the problem, all because the complaints were too vague and no actual course of action was proposed.

     

    Man, you could really benefit from a quick scan of Plato.

     

    One of the most advanced well educated scientifically productive societies got going politically. Unlike its more backward neighbors it felt strong. It still puzzles how Nazi germany had such a great run.

     

    I didn't even know you were also an elitist. I just had a discussion with someone that the person in front in the checkout line had food stamps and bought- low and behold potato chips. Must have been too stupid to spend two bucks on two measly apples.

     

    Perhaps it was viewing Social Network again. Constant, constant reactions on "this tree", "this tree" is not helpful for conversation. This is one reason that wives go nuts from their engineering husbands. I was lamenting this aspect of how poor communicators scientists are. But if they are trying to shout that the citizens are stupid perhaps it is a good thing that they find two way talking challenging.

     

     

  13. The world is watching . Gone are the days of ' it happened last week ' , ' it happened yesterday ' , it's on the net within an hour . Nearly live yoga , ooooh , alongside coppers , ask swansont for a translation , beating brains on the front of automobiles . Gandhi passivism , does it work ? Need a petrolbomb , wanna smash every window within a mile ? Is this the poor peaceful middle class , down to the lower lower lower class now ? Is it time to steal food to eat ?

     

     

     

    I know an 85 year old In 2006 I asked him what would happen in another Great Depression?

     

    1) Your relatives will move in with you

     

    2) Get a gun

     

    He recalls the thirties vividly. I am one of the deluded masses who believes it is my fault. I don't care if it is only 1 in 300 millionth my fault. It is when the good do nothing that evil triumphs. So the odd thing is that it is very natural for us to not do violence on a well-to-do person just because of their income. We had enough of destroying by color. In spite of what the America news media covers there is

    amazing acceptance of difference here that I'm trying to think of where it can be found anywhere. We don't want to destroy a human we just don't want them to continue to take our money.

  14.  

     

    You've used this reference a few times now and I don't get it at all. Usually stress makes blood pressure rise.

     

     

    Do you mean financially or literally, as in dying?

     

     

    What?! Why would someone applaud when their children are failing or dying? Who is doing this?

     

     

     

    Ironically, for many of us yelling at TV's etc. does no good. Finally we are heard. Blood pressure plummets.

     

    Babyboomers die. Especially because who wants to cover a 55 year old? So, the "story problem" is

    4 grandparents Half make it to 65. They have health insurance and have a good chance of making it to 75. But that would mean that the grandchildren would have lost half their parents. Say, left with Mom but have two grandparents to step in to the void.

     

    I held my breath til my Mom made it to 65. Now her health problems are being treated.

     

    Now data would help but also obscure. I'm amazed that those babyboomers born before 1964 have radioactive Strontium in their bones. Did the nuclear explosions postwar cause enough fallout exposure to kill them? Well, yes. How many? Chernobyl has good numbers because of thyroid cancer that radioactive fallout causes cancer. It is so rare those exposed have to have gotten it from the radioactive food. One reason that childhood cancer made such advances starting in the fifties is the increase in Leukemia among the young then. Many children died.

     

    Ok, does lack of health insurance kill baby boomers? Well, yes. How many?

     

    So retirees who hate healthcare for babyboomers should at least rethink this. They don't seem to care. It doesn't take any science to know that lack of healthcare endangers life and lack of health insurance endangers access to healthcare. The recent economic crash has hurt this age group. Who wants to hire a lot of 55 year olds and put them on the company's health insurance?

     

    And before anyone repeats the now constant mantra about exercise,eating, etc. , the diseases these influence are half caused by genetics. So even if you throw under the bus the stressed out Mcdonalds eaters, half would have those challenges anyway. Oddly enough, it is the low socioeconomics that kills the obese. Leave out the lower socioeconomics group and there is no separate risk factor effect for the majority.

     

    Yea, I could add the papers but then those here spend endless pages with the distraction of details not germane to real discussion of the topic and I love discussing the topic. I do prefer examples to washingtonDCspeak so I am stuck.

     

    In cowboy country they prefer the "are for me or agin me" with simplistic either/or choice. As wonderful a cowboy movie as that makes the real world is just messy enough to make that infantilistic. (was that your word?)

     

    So summary of my point here: Grownups can see the message.

     

    note: I have used &^#*% before so that could be criticized but initials used by iNow are blatant. I also had suggested he be emotional. Be careful what you wish for. Perhaps he has relatives in England where things can get very dicey.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    it is not necessary in either science or politics to be able to provide a solution as a prerequisite for claiming that a system is wrong. It is highly desirable to be able to posit an alternative rationale - but it cannot be essential to disproving a position; all one needs to do is to show that the current theory is incorrect and does not produce the results that are intended. I realise from your other posts that you are not a reactionary - but your argument plays straight into the hands of the powerful, who claim that the present system "works just fine", and that any other system must be fully functioning ab initio. The motivation for change is that the system has failed/is failing - it isn't the crash that doom-sayers predict daily, it is the divorce between productivity and reward, the wall street tail wagging the manufacturing/producing dog ... the triumph of debt over capital. I believe it is important to state clearly that a system is broken even when the minutiae of the corruption is beyond you. This forum is one of the few places I know with people who would be capable of understanding the intricacies of the market ( I freely admit I don't - but I know very bright people who have spent lives trying to) .

     

    yes. We are a fast paced world.

     

    Going back to some non real past is hugely radical. Making it seem so "well planned" is not sainthood.

     

    Would one deeply admire the Third Reich for being well planned?

     

    Good people are currently producing good results. One can still have a kind of faith even if steeped in science.

     

     

     

  15. The "It's you, not me" gambit rarely works. It's rarely right.

     

     

     

    This reminds me of the "Then a miracle occurs" cartoon by Sidney Harris. The problem is how does "Stop doing the above" achieve any goals, when no specific goals are stated? It's a general "We don't like the current system" complaint, without any explanation what, specifically, is wrong and what, specifically, should be done about it. Like iNow already said.

     

    "Occupy Wall Street" and "Stop doing the above" are analogous to "Work smarter, not harder" and other pithy motivational sayings. They sound good but don't actually help you with any distinct issues. "Tighten the flange" or "connect the components in parallel" would be helpful answers to a problem. Anything that translates as "make the system work better" isn't.

     

    As I was pointing out to the previous poster.

     

    You should be put into a book about why our technological society is unable to have a lot of scientists engaged in the political process. It is not unfair that reality is messy.

     

    From this, it seems you would like to see the protesters rally around a solution to the problem of economic inequity? I agree that it would make life a lot easier if they did, but I also think that this would be impossible. There are so many possible solutions that could occur at so many different institutional levels. Based on the youtube videos I've watched, it seems to me that the organizers of this movement are saying, "We need to recognize that economic inequity has grown worse in the past 30 years, and this is bad for America. We therefore need to have a grown up conversation about this and implement a number of solutions that will reduce this inequity." Some of the protesters are discussing solutions (via youtube) -- at the individual, city, and state level. Unfortunately, these are not 15 second soundbites.

     

    I just really hate the media's insistence to hold to pithy one-sentence rallying cries. We are effectively being told we can't have meaningful discussions about complex solutions to complex problems because people need their information as short and simplified as possible. Talk about infantilisation.

     

    My blood pressure has gone down because I have been continually perplexed. Seemingly intelligent people are soothed by the worse gobblygook. It rivals the idiocy of weirdness of the level of Jim Crow and even as far back as the Civil War. It isn't that we never had crazy, we just foolishly get optimistic that it is behind us.

     

    Babyboomers are dropping like flies. Their parents who have found safe harbor at 65 applaud that as grandchildren lose parents. Cupboards get bare for 1 in 7 Americans. The number one reason for an early death other than gender? Scientists I ask never get this - IT IS SOCIOECONOMICS. iNow had excellent ideas to do like The New Deal and that is econ 101 to flow from the govt to the 99% which weird mouthpieces ignore. Saving the economy saves everyone.

     

    Nero plays. The champagne flows above the little people below on Wall Street. That is a more lucid picture than some single comic.

  16. Good point. It does affect everybody, but the negative things are not the only effect that alcohol has on society. I just don't understand you cannot see any positive things about alcohol.

     

     

    Ok. So it is bad for Russian society. I don't live in Russia, and I have no idea about its problems... so I will accept that from you.

     

    But what about other societies? In the Netherlands, according to this list, we drink 13.25 liter of alcohol per person per year. Russia is more with 15.76, but the difference is not huge. But we don't kill ourselves, and we also don't drink-and-drive much. In general, people behave themselves and don't drink too much.

     

    I get the idea that you (and others in this thread) keep focussing only on the negative examples, but I think it is not fair.

     

     

    What about all the babies that are born because of a romantic candlelight dinner with a glass of wine? :)

     

     

    And I enjoy going out and having a beer. And I maintain that you're searching all around the world for problems to point out...

    http://www.saffrance.fr/en/home/fetal-alcohol-syndrome/questionsanswers.html

     

    "In France, it is estimated that the "trouble" caused by alcohol during pregnancy affects 1% of births, that is to say 7,000 new children each year. This means that about 500,000 French suffer to varying degrees of fetal alcohol effects. The fetal alcohol syndrome itself is, in France, the leading cause of mental retardation not genetic.

     

    It affects one birth in 3000 in the Pas-de-Calais. Alcoholism in France affects 2 million people, including 600 000 women (the latter statistic is particularly questionable: rigorous evaluation is very difficult due to almost constant denial of facts).

     

    During pregnancy, 5% of women drink three glasses of alcohol per day on average, which is already a danger to the unborn child. Experts now believe that the risk appears on the first glass is the reason why, during pregnancy, should maintain a strict abstinence."

     

     

    The frank syndrome is now obvious to pediatricians but the more subtle effects are even more widespread. In the US the nonuse of condoms is heavily associated with drinking. If that female is then in the habit of drinking she may continue to do so before she knows she is pregnant. Withdrawal from heavy drinking is not publicized but for an alcoholic it is more dangerous than heroin withdrawal. Quitting can kill.

     

    So as devastating as birth defects that cause mental retardation are the large numbers of mentally retarded are actually caused not by pure bad luck but an induced poison.

     

    I can imagine churchgoers are more guilty of causing this as they are inundated with messages they will go to hell if they end an alcohol exposed pregnancy.

     

     

     

     

  17. One of the best ways to make a vehicle go where you want it to go is to offer to drive. If you outright hijack it, there will be those who object.

     

    The Tea Party got their cash but what went wrong was their agenda got taken over by those who offered to drive. "No taxation without representation" got warped into "No change in the tax structure". They grew their grassroots by deceiving their members into thinking their own middle class taxes would be raised and spent liberally. Add Fox News into the mix and you have people who watch nothing else get misinformed about what's really going on.

     

     

    Don't get me wrong. I think the idea behind what they're doing is great and I admire their resolve. But they're vulnerable right now because the media is portraying them as uncoordinated. This does many things, but the three most dangerous are that 1) it makes them dismissible by the right (many of whom might actually have more common ground with OWS than with the Tea Party), 2) it slows grassroots growth, and 3) it makes them ripe for takeover by a leader (or group) who may share one or two of their goals but ultimately is much more self-serving.

     

    Read the What is the Tea Party? and you'll see it's basic Republican platform. Do you want OWS to end up as basic Democrat platform so we're just back to square one again, shouting across a fence? OWS needs to show what makes them different while also showing how much common ground it shares with the vast majority of Americans. That's what they aren't doing well, imo.

     

    I think it would surprise how well they are doing it.

     

    Right out of the box the media had this weird party line. No matter how many times the message was repeated they fought them by saying they weren't clear. Odd. It gives comfort to see all these people and all this support that have a powerless message. It is not true. The message is so basic and is merely a sum of recent history and an understanding of what has happened.

     

    This is the guy interviewed by Fox. Scientists would do well to meet the common man halfway. Reality is a separate thing from the hallowed halls of learning or insular research labs. IQ is a very different thing from understanding and especially openness.

     

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJgWdfZqDj0

     

     

     

  18. I hate to have to be the one to tell you this, but that IS incoherent and lacking in clarity. You may as well be demanding that companies and investros be more awesome on a scale of 1 to cheese, and make rainbows softer for garden gnomes in suburbia, but only if gemini's third moon is crossing venus.

     

    Yes, the protestors lack clarity in their message. They look like a bunch of whiney teenagers mad because their dad won't let them take the car out, and they're running around throwing an unfocused tantrum... as if their anger is just generalized unfocused spew being thrown at passers by with zero purpose or objective other than to vent and chant.

     

     

    What specifically do you want changed? Do you want specific transactions regulated? Do you want some sort of increased oversight, or transparency? Do you want front end capital investments to be lower so more people can participate and get started? Do you want campaign finance reform so seats in congress cannot be bought as simply? Do you want more people to vote so representation is not only on the extremes? Do you want Citizens United to be overturned? What the hell do these people want? I'm pretty sure not even they know.

     

    Be specific. You and the well-intentioned but painfully naive hippies playing frisbie and doing yoga on Wall Street right now sound like a tribe of bloody fools who are screaming at a casino for taking money they voluntarily fed into the slot machine. Either figure out what specifically you're requesting and form a plan to attain it, or STFU already.

     

    I give up.

     

    It is impossible to speak even basic symbolic logic to those who are scientifically trained. Too pedestrian. No wonder in a technological advanced culture "the other half" are taught to remain clueless.

     

    If you have any engineering understanding at all.

     

    Number one- Define the problem.

     

    I think you are blinded by emotion and should go get blinded by science. Reality is a big part of that. Consider it, please. Instead of tearing down, think.

     

     

     

     

    If they can't get their message straight soon, they will get flooded by people who do have a message, and backing, and organization. And it will seem glorious until they realize their original intent just got shanghaied.

     

    It's what happened to the original Tea Party.

     

    The Tea party very,very quickly got dumped on with tons of cash. Never then saw it as much grass roots for real. Koch brothers anyone? Excellent media coverage for 50 paid whiteheads who show for ten minutes.

     

    The message is straight. Occupy Wall street have a very clear list also if you info on their facebook. Finally, after you, me and a brother-in-law have kveched for years, they have decided to actually do. If you look at the posts from the other conversations there has been plenty of whining on this forum. Using the detached third person is such a thin disguise.

     

    Ley's try again.

     

    Define The Problem

     

    $99% ----------------> 1%

     

    $1% -----------------> $ politicians, supreme court lobbying, corporate malfeasance criminal avoidance, banks, media, offshore tax avoidance, rich CEOs ,lying financials = < democracy

     

     

    Now, hopefully your blood pressure can remain steady. Is this too easy for this political forum? What to then do?

     

    Solution

     

    STOP DOING THE ABOVE

     

    so, Occupy Wall Street

  19. We've been hearing this a lot: the wall street protesters lack a clear message. To me, the message is crystal clear: there's too much power at the top and the middle class is getting screwed. What do you think?

     

    In my town we do. There are Occupy San Francisco etc. all over.

     

    As a science trained type I'll do it in simple math.

     

    Why? $99% -------------------------------------> 1%

     

    Think who controls mainstream media. That is the message that media wants to portray. But that guy talking to fox is premo and facebook is golden. I'll post him when I find it.

     

    My blood pressure has gone -down- 20 points since it started. I am hoping we get back democracy in time to save our and our loved ones livelihoods.

     

    Occupy Wallstreet!

     

     

     

  20. The market went down about 1000 pts in the last several days, based largely on hysteria and the unsurprising idiotic behavior of Congress. The value of my stocks dropped a small fortune. I can either sell, cementing the loss, and put the money in cash accounts yielding about 0 and holding dollars of questionable long-term value, or leave it invested in corporations that have strong balance sheets,produce useful products, pay dividends and invest in growing their business.

     

    I think I can figure this out.

     

     

     

    "On Monday, stocks fell sharply, starting the fourth quarter on a dismal note as developments in the euro zone over the week weighed down confidence. Markets in Europe also fell on Monday and have extended their losses in trading today. At last check, the FTSE 100 Index in London was down 2.8%, while the DAX Index in Frankfurt was down 3.2%. In Asia, the Nikkei 225 Index was down 1.1%."

     

    "Ahead of the opening bell, the Dow Jones Industrial Average futures are trading 110 points lower at 10,419, the S&P 500 futures are trading 12 points lower at 1,075, and the Nasdaq 100 futures are trading 19 points lower."

     

    Read more: http://thestockmarke...8#ixzz1ZoiiGrJ0

     

     

     

     

    Current 10,523 only needs 5% drop to crack 10,000 so this will influence the bottom falling out. There will be circuit breakers at 10% closing the market for a while. It is also the new low for the last 12 months.

     

    I had personal experience with a high IQ scientifically trained person who ignores money and business. When I visited my doctor sister her taxes were undone and she had paychecks in her dresser drawer. There are finer things in life than money.

     

    One in seven Americans are food insecure. And yet see that the Panera's workers cash will likely go again to the multi-millionaires on Wall Street. When if they had followed Econ 101 and the will of the people (aka Occupy Wall Street) this new Great Depression would have been avoided.

     

     

    Well, it still can be. If grandparents would just care about children.

     

     

     

     

    Reason Grandparents were coopted with ridiculous rhetoric to ignore reality and vote against the economic rescue of their children and grandchildren with paradoxical cries that they were "helping their children's futures." The normal human reaction to restrain innovation as one ages was manipulated and paid for by the wealthy as a power grab which resulted in the destruction of the American Economy. Plus only 50 have to show and the corporate media covered it.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  21. The question that the OP does not literally ask, but that I can see hidden in that post is: who is responsible for our problems now: the lenders (banks and investors) who gave money to the debtors until the debtors got into trouble, or the debtors for accepting all that money until they were in trouble?

     

    I think both are responsible for this situation. And therefore I partially agree with the OP that the lenders are (also) in control of the economy. I also agree that the lenders are largely left alone, while all the focus is on the debtors. I think it's not too much to ask that lenders (banks / investors) also take some responsibility, and that they are a little more careful where they give their money.

     

    It's not just countries (Greece) that got into trouble because it was too easy to borrow money. It's especially the individual people who were able to take a mortgage that was just too high for their income. While you can expect a country to have financial advisors, you can't expect the guy on the street to understand all the risks involved with borrowing money... and that's where I think the ' lenders' should take more responsibility.

     

    The last 30 years gave corporations so much rope they hung themselves. So maybe corporations are people. They just haven't got out of the sandbox and agencies decided to not have any parental supervision. Of course, when the individuals, corporations are run by flesh and blood humans who cry all the way to the bank pocketing our millions, why would the humans care? Occupy Wall Street

     

     

     

  22. http://en.wikipedia....ki/Trading_curb As the market tanks. Here are trading curbs (circuit breakers)

    Percent amount of drop. On the day the DOW drops below 10,000 expect to see these used.

     

     

    eba8c11691030634e39639d668504b6b.png

     

     

    The DOW is the one to watch because it is running 10,800 and so with an 8% drop it hits a significant number 10,000 sooner than the other indices.

     

    Will "those who run us" wake up from Occupy Wall Street and do econ 101 and inject the cash to the 99% instead of the 99% again dumping cash to the Wall Street 1%? Will those on Wall Street themselves finally get some poliitical Will to save the US economy and use their influence for that? Stay Tuned. So Reason Stock Market crashes - The 1% continue to do business as usual and kill the golden goose by taking so much it starves everyone and even finally themselves.

  23. Hi. For this particular topic, and it's rare for me to say this, it's better that you *don't* google and attempt to navigate on your own. Problem being that this is an area of rabid pseudoscience, and if you have no background, you'll be unable to distinguish between sites that are making up information to sell you on a health scam, and sites that are telling you the truth.

     

    So here's the skinny: No foods change the pH of the blood. The blood is a buffer system. What's a buffer system? A buffer system, by definition, resists change in pH.

     

    In other words, "alkalinizing diets" don't truly exist, and we should all take a moment to be grateful of this, because if it were that easy to alter, everyone following these diets would be dead. Shifts outside of the buffer region do happen, but you die very rapidly thereafter, if it doesn't correct itself.

     

    Your blood would pH at about 7.38, but 7.35-7.45 is still ok. Your kidneys are the major controllers of this action, but your lungs play a direct role, too, and, in fact, should anything push your blood past the buffered region, your lungs will be the first responders. Your kidneys do it by directly changing the ion concentration in the blood, as they're filtering it. They're fast, but not instantaneous, so kidney-induced changes take a while to accumulate. On the other hand, your lungs do it by expressing more CO2, or taking in more oxygen, as the situation warrants.

     

    Hopefully, you'll never witness this in your life, but diabetics are prone to acidosis for several reasons, one being the effect of diabetes on the kidneys, and if you do see it, you'll be able to spot it forever after that by the type of breathing they're doing. It's very odd, and not a conscious decision.

    Thank you so much. I never got into it and it had the feel of a bunch of bunk.

     

    Slightly related, I have elevated CO2 and a condition that tends to go that way and with low (usually 3.5 potassium). I just bought potassium. I dread the idea it would get so bad I'd need IV potassium. Your explanation does let me consider why that is truly dicey. I am using low dose potassium as it is a few weeks before the next MD visit.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.