Jump to content

[Tycho?]

Senior Members
  • Posts

    1192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by [Tycho?]

  1. 1) Aliens dont want to colonize space, for many potential reasons.

     

    2) Local supernovae or some other phenomenon exterminates or severely sets-back life in a region of space.

     

    3) There is something which makes intersteller space travel more difficult that we assume. Now, its pretty damn difficult already, simply due to distances. But our understanding of the area outside the heliosphere is limited, and there could be some property of the space that would further hinder space travel (ie extra high energy particles, or something more exotic that we dont yet understand.)

     

    The unlikely hood of live appearing in the first place seems decent, but life has shown to be quite tenacious and our lack of understanding on how life formed in the first place makes me not want to include this on my list.

     

    As well, aliens could simply be so advanced that we have no way of detecting them or their signals.

  2. Most of the weirdness comes up due to the particle nature of radiation and matter. A wave isn't like a billiard ball, with a ball you can say "this ball sits at position x". A wave on the other hand cannot be defined so exactly, its indistinct, which leads to a number of odd, counterintuitive things due to its wave nature.

  3. Yes, people (and everything else) results in the production of heat. All of human activity, including things like industry and automobile use would put out quite a lot of heat into the atmosphere, enough to be measurable anyway. But it would be tiny compared to what the earth recieves from the sun.

  4. A new theory of how planets form finds havens of stability amid violent turbulence in the swirling gas that surrounds a young star.

     

    With the news of this new planet, and the controversy surrounding the

    Big Bang Theory. I am curious what the general concensus is?

     

    New planets are forming and evolving outside of the general theory.

    And if this is the case, do we have to start the whole theory over,

    by defining what a star is, and how they came to be?

     

     

    Everlasting

    Futuristic Science Fiction Novel

    Moon Over Key Biscayne

     

    :cool:

     

    What does this have to do with Big Bang theory? And theories are almost never started over, usually they are partially correct and just need to be changed.

  5. As has been mentioned, you cannot view a neutron star like a regular star. You may or may not know that a neutron on its own is not stable; it will decay in ~11 minutes (off the top of my head). Yet, neutron stars apparently do not decay, at least according to our limited understanding of them. This can draw parallels between a neutron star and an atomic nucleus- which is where most neutrons exist and where they can remain stable.

     

    So, basically, you need quantum mechanics to be able to understand such a system. This doesn't look so good, because even something like the neucleus of say a uranium atom is rather complicated. And instead having a few tens of particles, a neutron star would have... yikes, something like 10^57 neutrons***!? Thats a fair amount. Treating a neutron star like one incredibly massive atomic neucleus is a very appealing idea to me, although I doubt this works beyond being an analogy.

     

    *** calculation

    Wiki says neutron stars are 1.3-2.1 solar masses, so on the same order of magnitude as our sun which has a mass of 2x10^30 kg. A neutron has a mass of 1.6x10^-27 kg. 57 orders of magnitude of difference. Assuming that all or at least the vast majority of a neutron star is in fact neutrons.

  6. Strange assignment. There would indeed be air resistance, and nothing would be in slow motion.

     

    I dont know why you would have to do this for a physics class, but just read some sci-fi. Put your society on a rotating habitat (like Halo, or ringworld, or your everyday rotating space station) to provide centrifugal force that keeps people pressed to the floor.

  7. BB theory, or that which is accepted scientific theory (so said), simply states that everything (that means everything) from a singularity which included this everything (including space) unexplainable began to expand at very great speeds away from a place that is not explainable (no center) and continues to this day. its said what formed from stuff inside that thing and as the new found space cooled matter formed, from the the new found gravity. originally or in the late 1920's this was thought to be about 3-5 billion years ago, but as known or now visible, this figure is 14.2 billion years ago.

     

    rarely mentioned is the fact that there are alternative theory, many of which out date BBT, that are still very much considered. steady state or the theory that tries to explain things from an eternal existence or a version of this the most common.

     

    Still very much considered? Please, its archaic, there is zero evidence for steady state, while a huge amount for big band. Steady state hasn't been seriously considered for decades.

  8. It would be best to use a microwave that you could do without.

     

    But doing it for such a short time should be ok, once you see it glowing dont let it go too much longer. You could try to get in contact with those people that made the videos (even posting in the comments of the video if its on youtube could yield some results).

  9. I dont understand, the big bang is the thought that all matter in the universe came from a single point isnt it? Why is it such an illegitimate thought then to say that this is ---the---origin?

     

    You are visualizing it as an explosing thats occuring in say a 3D room. This is not a good way to think about it. There is no room that the explosion occured in, the exposion emompases everything, there is nothing outside it.

     

    The oft-mentioned analogy is this: Take a balloon, and draw 4 points on it with a marker. Blow up the balloon, and notice how as the balloon expands all the points move away from eachother. Inside and outside the balloon is nothing; you can't draw the points on just the air. So all these points are moving away from eachother, but they are not all moving away from a single point.

  10. So does that mean the solar system is spinning around the event horizon of this suppermassive black hole.

     

    Come to think of it does that mean everything everywhere is actually in the event horizon of some black hole somewhere

     

    Uh, yes it does mean that. But the event horizon is thousands of light years away, and totally undetectable. So for 99% of the galaxy the black hole in the center doesn't make a difference.

  11. Hey, many things have been growing in my mind these past years.

    I just thought i'd share one of them with you to see your opinions on the matter.

     

    Think about this, The universe must be everlasting (Distance-wise), So do you really think there could be another world? Just like ours... Maybe more advanced or less.

    Maybe there is millions, And will we ever find out?

    If you think about it, there cannot be just one world, Being us, it seems theoretically impossible if you think of the vast space in the universe.

    Will we find out one day? or is it going to be an Unsolved mystery?

     

    Thats all i can right at this present in time, I have to run.

    Cyaaa soon.

     

    What do you mean by "everlasting (distance wise)" ?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.