-
Posts
27373 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
251
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Status Updates posted by iNow
-
"I want my commenters to be uncivil. There is no virtue in politeness when confronted with ignorance, dishonesty, and delusion. I want them to charge in to the heart of the issue and shred the frauds, without hesitation and without faltering over manners. These demands for a false front of civility are one of the strategies used by charlatans who want to mask their lack of substance — oh, yes, it would be so goddamned rude to point out that a huckster is lying to you. I am quite happy that we have a culture of being rude to frauds here."
-
Thanks for your nomination as the most knowledgable member. While I, for one, know that is patently false when compared to the posts of so many other members, it's nice to know that my contributions here are appreciated on some level. Cheers mate!
(btw... Eagle Nebula is one of my favorites, too)
-
"Since the dawn of rational thought, the advancement of science has been retarded by the minions of mysticism, and profound revelations have often been opposed or suppressed by the greater part of the dominant religion, because dogmatic faith is not based on reason and zealots will not be reasoned with." AronRa
- Show previous comments 7 more
-
Let me ask you... Was their mysticism rooted in reality? No. Just because Newton was an alchemist doesn't mean his belief led to advancement in the science of chemical reaction. Also, sure... we can find singular examples, but anecdotes don't negate the median trend. Those were quotes from Richard Feynman. Not me. Take your challenge to him.
-
"The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error." ~John Stuart Mill, On Liber...
- Show previous comments 1 more
-
His aversion to religion, in the sense usually attached to the term, was of the same kind with that of Lucretius: he regarded it with the feelings due not to a mere mental delusion, but to a great moral evil. He looked upon it as the greatest enemy of morality: first, by setting up factitious excellencies—belief in creeds, devotional feelings, and ceremonies, not connected with the good of human kind—and causing these to be accepted as substitutes for genuine virtue: but above all...
-
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day; teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime; give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.
- Show previous comments 6 more
-
Not really. The beginning of the universe is a separate question from the existence of god(s), especially since positing that "goddidit" only displaces the original question and leaves us with, "who/what created god then?" If you're willing to assume that god has always existed, then why not eliminate the unnecessary middle man and assume that the universe has always existed? It's turtles all the way down.
-
Because that would mean that it was Steady-State, which is clearly not possible because the Universe is always expanding. It's quite funny how it was originally thought by the scientific community that the Universe always existed and it wasn't even the religious who thought such things for it was a Catholic who formed the first idea of an expanding Universe.
-
I've never turned down a friendship request from a 'sexy bitch' before in my life, and I'm sure not inclined to start now. Cheers.
-
Interesting idea. Truly, I'm not that interesting. I am good at responding to stuff, and answering questions. If I had one, it would be boring, of that I'm relatively certain. I'll consider it though. Thanks for the incentive.
-
It's been nice seeing you around these last few days. Your absence was noticed. I hope all is well with you and yours.
-
It's good to see you, mate. I missed responding to your posts. The members here are much more science savvy and focussed. Just avoid the religious talk, as that's not welcome, but would be okay in the context of a study or an article on the topic. Anyway, thanks for the friendship request. Like I said, it's good to see you. Cheers.
-
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity, but be sure not to completely rule out stupidity, either.
-
TAR - You are a very kind soul, and I appreciate your words, but I want to make clear that the closure of the "How Religion Hijacks Neocortical Mechanisms and Why so Many Believe in a Deity" thread was unrelated to you. Your contributions always challenged me to think in new ways, and (while it may not have been clear) I appreciated that tremendously. Again though, the thread closure was a result of my own impatience and frustration with the staff, and not a result of anything you contributed. Please know that, it was my fault, not yours. Take care, friend.