Jump to content

Amr Morsi

Senior Members
  • Posts

    272
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Status Updates posted by Amr Morsi

  1. "A concept that satisfies all facts with nothing contradicting it [including unjustification delimas], is a satisfier, but not mainly THE solution" ...... A good rule (if correct to you) in the science of "Modelling".

    But, we must make checks to discriminate the situation, i.e. to confirm exactly the known model. I am just commenting.

  2. Congratulations! Prize has been granted. My love to all dedicators and judges. And, to my wife .. and daughter.

    Allah's Guidance

  3. Constancy of velocity of light proven in what is called Sagnac's (Sagnaq's) effect. Already carried the experiment By Myself and the result was positive.

    It depends upon propagation of IR or R Laser in an Optical Fiber.

  4. GEM (continued):

    d. F>=n*d(m*v>)/dt

  5. GEM [Gravito Electro-magnetism ===> GR2007]/GREM [General relativistic Electro-magnetism ===> GR2010]:

    2 theories that were in my way to produce UT [The Unity Theory].

    1. In GEM: a. same equation for permittivity [as in UT], but with relativistic term. b. refractive index is non homogeneous, i.e changes as function of space from a charge. c. mass=n*gamma*mass_o d....

  6. GEMT (Comments):

    So, whenever there is an electric charge/current, there is gravitational one, and so, we can unify both as one force, no doubt, even if not considered same in nature.

  7. GEMT (Continued):

    A concept of Complex Field can be introduced to carry the value of the Gravitational Field and EM one.

    Equations will be advised shortly.

    GEMT is to unify gravity and electromagnetic theory by the method of association.

    Any Direct Help will be considered and appreciated.

  8. GEMT (Continued):

    The following must be considered:

    1. EM will not affect in Space-Time Curvature

    2. Acceleration depends upon q/m ratio in case of EM

  9. GEMT (Continued):

    Then they are associated, if not of the same nature.

    Added that: 1. The 2 fields (and forces) are very similar in effect.

    2. They travel by the same speed, speed of light.

  10. GEMT (Last):

    Equations are as follow:

    1. Einstein's Equation: [G]=8*pi*G/c^4 [T]

    2. Modified Geodesic is followed.

    where M.G. is the minimum modified path which is the 4d path/R reduced by EML (Electromagnetic Lagrangian )/mc^2.

  11. GEMT:

    1. All sub-nuclear particles decay in a very short time, greater than exp(-7), except (anti-) neutrinos (appr. 0 mass and charge), together with (anti-) protons which also decay in some interactions.

    2. All Leptons and quarks have masses and charges, except for neutrinos as stated above.

    So, whenever there is an electric charge/current, there is gravitational one.. t...

  12. Geometry can be analyzed to fundamentals. It can be proven to be based only on Pythagoras (some may debate to say on the circle property as well). Even the PI can be deduced from "Differential Pythagoras".

    And, thanks to 2 sincere girls, they derived it first to be analyzable to 4-funds: the above 2 in addition to plane-property and solid angle, which is true but in basics of...

  13. GREM (continued):

    The refractive index is still non homogeneous.

  14. GREM:

    1. It is the same as GEM, but with the relativistic term in curvature-permittivity is removed.

    2. And, the gammacee equivalence principle is introduced.

  15. Isn't attenuation high enough - in Optical Fibers - for the Light / Laser to approximately vanish?

    Optical Fibers are made of Silica (Plastics - Not Glasses).

  16. M-GEMT (Modified-Continued):

    1. Same GEM-Einstein Equation as below, but, T_u [instead of T] is complex. And, the imaginary term is the same of the real but for Origin Charge multiplied with m/q of the Rotating Body.

    2. The apply of Path Equation depends upon the model being used. It is the main Geodesic Rule but on (A+A*)/2 {Re A} where A=G+iG*.

    A is called Amr's Tensor.

  17. M-GEMT (Modified):

    It is more accurate and reproducible, i.e. it is reliable to give more unification patterns; a new modelling style. But, of coarse is more complex and it is complex in definition.

  18. Mention A.1:

    7th Quark has been explored. It is detected and have been isolated. It turned out that Quarks were already there but not correctly classified due to wrong interpretation of rigid theories "Colored Quarks" by M. Yukawa. It is the "Pion". No Decay of a hadron happens unless an Involved-Pion-Decay-Series is sensed and detected. Pion is the 7th Quark.

  19. Mention A.2:

    And, Charges of Quarks are not fractal. Charges of Quarks are not fractal.

    All what is mentioned above is in the sense of UT (Unity Theory) that I am following in my analysis.

  20. Mention A.3:

    Any way in the term of the Standard Model: PION (and Anti-PION) is essentially present in any Hadronical Decay. And, since it is e+ and e-, then it broke the believed idea of nessecitately - fractally - charged quatrks.

  21. Mention A.4:

    In all, it was totally expected by Unity Theory and specially by its pearl "P.Q.E.D." or "Sensed Epsilon - Complementary Muon".

    Just a mention here as it may serve.

    Finished.

  22. Missed you Andrew. How is your wife? She is better than you no wander, just obvious as she can look into your deep eyes.

    Don't kill ladies with innocence, but with the reason of innocence. I killed a cat before. :)~~~~~

    Just kidding man. She gonna be okay, after God's Will.

    You seem gettng higher in field, professor. Keep on and leave if IT REALLY GOT PR...

  23. No one knows everything in this life. But, there are some that are owned to science and knowledge ..... they do know much.Stick to them ..... they are TREASURES. Believe me THEY ARE TREASURES.

    It is very difficult to collect/understand or derive/formulate rules/laws and conclusions/morals.

    More difficult is to have the brain/mind that is to be able to do so.

  24. Reminder:

    7th Quark explored.

  25. The following may be true: "If Higgs has color charge, then it will consequently have electric charge and will be used to unify (and most probably: alone) the Standard Model".

    But, a question: "Does the symmetry ALWAYS get broken in Electro-Weak Interaction?".

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.