kumarevo

Posts
11 
Joined

Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Posts posted by kumarevo


Presuppositionnumbers have opposite points
Process:
P_{1} 0=(s.0)
P_{2} 1={(s.0),(s.1)}
P_{3} 2={(s.0),(s.1),(s.2)}
P_{4 }3={(s.0),(s.1),(s.2),(s.3)}
P_{5} 4={(s.0),(s.1),(s.2),(s.3),(s.4)}
...
...
[s_{7}]number opposite points
CM[s_{7}]does not know
______________
Presuppositionnumbers are comparable with each other
Process:
P_{1}two numbers (a, b ) are comparable with each other  a> b, a =b, a <b, ).(=(>,=,<)
P_{2}three numbers (a, b, c) are comparable with each other
P_{3}four numbers (a, b, c, d) are comparable with each other
...
[s_{8}]comparability numbers
CM[s_{8}]known two of comparability, comparability of three numbers(a number comparable with the numbers b and c),
comparability of the other knows.
0 
kumarevo: Please write out some prose an explain what it is you are talking about. Based on your post history throughout the internet you regularly fail Turing tests. Please show that you have some intent here other than using this site as a billboard on which to post your mathspam. We are a discussion forum, not a free publishing house.
I initially gave you three questions, first can be solved by the present knowledge of mathematics (so please solve it, you'll get an interesting result, which calls into question some sets of numbers), the second task will not be resolved because it knows that the current math functions can be final and only the set of natural numbers, the third task will not be resolved because the math does not know the current gap number and several forms of calculation subtraction.
what I've realized that the whole thing in math geometry, and that everything is a ratio of two (more) geometrical object in a line, plane, nvolume, I am totally rejected the historical legacy that has a current math, I started from the first geometry object (along natural) and the concept of point and a basic rule to connect the two (more) along the natural area this is the first axiom and it does not prove,each new object (concept, calculation, ...) occurs along the natural object or arising out along natural ...
1 
NATURAL MATHEMATICS
Presuppositionnatural long merge points in the direction of the first natural along AB
Process:
P1AB..CD..ABC(AC)
to read natural along AB to point B, is connected to the natural long CD to point C, shall be
P2ABC(AC)..DE..ABCD(AD)
read along the ABC(AC) to point C , connecting with the natural long DE to point D is done
renaming of points , we get along ABCD(AD)
P3ABCD(AD)..EF..ABCDE(AE)
...
[s_{3}]along (natural basis)
Definition[along]the first and last point and the distance between points
CM[s_{3}]does not know
_________________________________________________________________________________
Presupposition  All points of a longer (the infinite form) can be replaced with labels: (0), (0,1 ),...,
(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 ),...
Process:
P_{1}N (_{0}) = {0,00,000,0000,...}
P_{2}N (_{0,1}) = {0,1,10,11,100,...}
...
P_{10}N (_{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}) = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, ...}
...
[s_{4}]number along
[s_{5}]set of natural numbers N
We will use N (_{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}) = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,...}
Definition[number along] a starting point (0), the last point at infinity
[number N]The number 0 is the point 0
Other numbers are longer, the first item is 0, the last point is the point of the name (number)
CM[s_{4}].does not know , [s_{5}]axiom
_______________________
PresuppositionNumbers have their points
Process: P_{1} 0=(.0) P_{2} 1={(.0),(.1)} P_{3} 2={(.0),(.1),(.2)} P_{4} 3={(.0),(.1),(.2),(.3)} P_{5} 4={(.0),(.1),(.2),(.3),(.4)}...
[s_{6}]number points CM[s_{6}]does not know
0 
questions
1.Z÷(10^n)=?,Zintegers
2.write in abbreviated form (if the function can be final and natural)
2+5=7 , 2+10=12 , 2+15=17, 2+20=22 , 2+25=27 , 2+30=32 , 2+35=37 , 2+38=40,
2+40=42, 2+41=43 , 2+44=46 , 2+45=47, 2+47=49 , 2+50=52 ,2+57=59 , 2+60=62 ,
2+64=66, 2+70=72, 2+71=73 , 2+78=80 , 2+80=82 , 2+85=87 , 2+90=92 ,2+92=94
3.how to solve this current knowledge of mathematics:
along a (20m) ,deleted between 10 m and 15 m (b=5m) , wet get c (image)
Can mathematics explain the only two axiom that the rest are just evidence (experiments), if you think so join me show you Srdanova math, see you
__________________________________________________ ______________
I figure this way, from education school has 12 years, I was always the subject of mathematics and physics had the best grades, math deal amateur, studying mathematics I came to know that mathematics can be simplified and be connected (to be explained only with two axiom) and extend the mathematics that can solve math problems that present no solution.
Marjanovic Srdan
M.Biljanica
natural axiom
What is " nature along "?
nature along in figure 1
What is "point"?
start (end) natural long in figure 2
What is the " basic rule "?
basic rule is determined that the two ( more) longer only have to connect the points
[sn]mathematical facts
[s1]nature along
[s2]point (natural meaning of)
Definition[natural along]two points , distance between two points
CM (current mathematics)[s1]does not know , [s2]point is not defined , so anything and everything
0 
Are you saying that a point do not exist? because a point has a length?
I (MS.0) showed evidence that the length (area, volume) does not consist of points.Point there (I have defined MS.0).
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
MS.5. Copying from the basic set of numbers into another set of skup.Reset.
From the basic set of numbers are copied ((;)with repetition without repetition, finally, endless,
combined) in the second set. Reset (; is the release of a set of number brackets (code sets,
= sign) to another form of description set.Reset together with a number, just remove the brackets
(code set, character =).
MS.6. Reset set frequency. Sign connecting _ (minimum 2) reset sets.
Same set of numbers (minimum 2) to reset in frequency. Form: a (number) f (mark frequency),
b (as there are same number), b (end frequency). Simple form.
To understand my math read all articles marked MS. (of evidence).
kumarevo.ms @ gmail.com
MS.7.Reset setsrcko.
Set of numbers (minimum 2) where the distance to the furthest point to the same reset in srcko.
Form:a (initial number), b (distance), c (final number, if there is srcko final, unless there is
srcko is infinite). Simple form.
MS.8.Reset setfrequency + pendant.
Reset meeting (frequency) joined the other numbers (minimum 1) that are not in reset frequency.
Form (number) f (mark frequency), b (as there are same number), b (end frequency),
c (pendantnumber). Simple form.
0 
Just the last one? Really? None of this makes sense.
kumarevo, what exactly are you trying to say here? What exactly is your point?
point is explained (MS.0)
0 
MS.3. Cycle connection (2.1) the direction AB. Along.
The cycle of connection (2.1 (final, infinite)) in the direction AB.
Along the required form of natural line (series connection (2.1) the direction of AB), can be finite or infinite
To understand my math read all articles marked MS. (of evidence).
kumarevo.ms @ gmail.com
MS.4. Cycle signs. The main set of numbersnatural numbers. Numerical along.
The first point (A), connecting the points (B, C, D,...) in a cycle of (2.1 (the direction AB,infinite (along numeric)))replace the cycle of signs: (0,1), (0,1,2), (0,1,2,3), (0,1,2,3,4), (0,1,2,3, 4.5),(0,1,2,3,4,5,6),
(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,, (0,1,2,3,4,5,6 , 7,8,9), (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, A),
(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, A, B ),.... , cycle signs we'll call numbers.
In today's applied mathematics series characters: (0.1), (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7),(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 , 9),
(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, A, B, C, D, E, F). We will apply (0,1,2,3,4,5, 6,7,8,9) because he isa mass
use. Set the current math axiom, mine is a basic set of numbers (N = {0,1,2,3,4,5,...}.
To understand my math read all articles marked MS. (of evidence).
kumarevo.ms @ gmail.com
0 


Mathematics as we know is limited, there are mistakes.
The first error of mathematics: length (area, volume) consists of the points.
Look at the evidence which shows that the length includes the length, size of area,volume by volume. Then you wonder what is the point.
(larger image)
I am a mathematician, inventor. My basis for an axiom (definition point, along a natural).
Everything else is proved in the space, get to know my math, expand their knowledge.
MS.0. The basic axiom. Definition point. Natural along.
Beginning (end) is longer than the natural point. Natural along with two points, the lengthbetween points.
(small image)
To understand my math read all articles marked MS. (of evidence).
kumarevo.ms @ gmail.com
0
srdanova math
in Speculations
Posted
[latex]\frac{Z}{{{{10}^n}}}= {\rm ?}[/latex]
1.Z÷(10^n)=?
a={0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} , b={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
n=1 , Z÷10={...,(2÷10),(1÷10),(0÷10),(1÷10),(2÷10),...}={...,0.2,0.1,0,0.1,0.2,...}={Z,Z.b}
n=2 , Z÷100={Z,Z.b,Z.ab}
n=3 , Z÷1000={Z,Z.b,Zab,Zaab}
n=4 , Z÷10000={Z,Z.b,Z.ab,Zaab,Zaaab}
...