Jump to content

Lance

Senior Members
  • Posts

    1704
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lance

  1. The side effects of being a learning zombie is perhaps low selfesteem and confidence where you want to speak up. Perhaps some type of altistic attribute where things come in but they don't come out.

     

    Funny how I have never experienced this nor is it listed on the slip of paper that comes with the perscription.

     

    I remember my classmates taking advantage of my state by beating me up most of the time. I hate my past and wish I could kill everyone. That's a different story.

     

    To be perfectly honest with you It doesn't sound like people beating you up was caused by a drug.

     

    On the other side though. I believe it was my doctor who wanted me to try something different. It's because doctors are controlled and funded by insurance companies as some of us know. This is where ethics become torn and piss me off.

     

    doctors will keep prescribing drugs to test out how the patient will be. It's a type of guniea pig system which I find very evil. If what has already been working' date=' already works, let it be. However, doctors don't do that because they are corrupt and want to keep in good terms with the insurance company by using people like guinea pigs and having them come back reporting results.

    [/quote']

     

    I think you're stereotyping. Most doctors are not like this. You should have changed doctors which means the previous doctor would have lost money and had to change his ways to prevent losing more patients.

     

    When a kid just plays video games without care for homework without distraction of things, that's a discipline problem.

     

    It's a shame beating doesn't work for these ' discipline' problems.

     

    Just out of curiosity, exactly how much ritialin were you taking at the time?

  2. He can' date=' and will convert many to think that racism is ok. Hitler did it to millions of germans, the kkk have done it to thousands, and the media has portrayed it indefinetley.

    Some people are inherentley racist, some aren't. Let me give you an example. There were normal people, who did not have a probelm with other races. When Katrina hit, many started making fun of the lower class people in the states affected by Katrina. Some called the blacks "Dumb Niggers", others called the Whites "Trailer Park Trash".[/quote']

     

    No, Hitler didn't. Look at the German people before Hitler. World war I had ended and the Germans were defeated. They felt like trash; they felt inferior. Hitler only put into words what the German people where thinking. He told them what they wanted to hear. He Didn't convert the German people. He simply brought out the worst in them.

     

    Your Katrina argument is irrelevant and futile. These people were not converted by the disaster; they were always racist. The disaster just gave these people a chance to fume their hatred.

     

    The kkk didn't convert anybody either. The kkk only added leadership to the racism and gave it more direction.

     

    They said these people were stupid for not leaving when the were told a hurricane was coming. Now, lets take a step back. What causes racism? Ignorance causes hate, hate causes anger, and anger causes racism. These people are mad because there so called "Tax Dollars" are being wasted on "Dumb Niggers" and "Trailer Park Trash" people, who didn't listen to the suggestions of evacuation. But in fact, they didn't know, that theyre was thousands of people who could not evacuate. They did not have cars, they didn't have enough of their insulin medicine, they were paralyzed and lived by themselves, the public transportaion systems were full and the local, state, and federal goverment wasn't providing them a way out. There are many more reason why many people could not evacuate.

     

    Again, irrelevant. Now you're simply ranting.

     

    But, since this man and his presumed intelligent "Free Speech" comments are bases on pure hate, further fed by the media, are saying, stupid, racist things, many people stand with him and defend him. Defending racism, free speech or not, is WRONG. Judging others based on their skin color or ethinic status is WRONG.

     

    I never defended his racism. Nor did I call him intelligent. Racist and stupid or not, he still has his rights which you can not remove.

     

    How dare you say this man has no affect on Americans. Of course he does! For example. Before 9/11, many weren't aggresive toward the Middle Eastern people who live in America. Now, watch a stand up from the year 2002 and beyond, and see how many jokes putting down Middle Eastern people are said. Amazing no?

     

    I'm not sure what you're getting at here. Crook didn't create racism against the Middle East, bombing the twin towers did.

     

    I am not sitting here, bitching and moaning, but rather pointing out the sheer stupidity and ignorance of this man.

     

    Again, I never said he wasn't either.

     

    P.S, I would also like to know how you substantuate that my reasoning is flawed. Also, I would like to see a link to the statistics supporting your claim that NONE, not even one, creationist has converted to atheism on these forums.

     

    The above was a reasonable assumption considering none of them have changed reasoning and most were banned eventually. Perhaps you would like to show me a series of posts that might suggest that a creationist was converted?

  3. You admire Crook for his one ability (which isnt even well executed) and throw away all the other garbage he stated? :confused:

     

    Have you lost your mind? Is it not possible to admire a quality about somebody and still reject his opinions? While we are on the topic of Nazis I might as well also add that I admire Hitler's leadership skills. That doesn't mean that I wouldn't murder Hitler if I had the chance to go back in time 75 years. There isn't a person in this world who doesn't have bad qualities, that doesn't mean we should also ignore everybody's good qualities; we would end up hating the entire world, which I have no doubt many of us do.

     

    I find it disgusting that you seem to considering yourself better than him. By doing so you are no better than him in that your are teaching people to hate an entire group of people who have similar ideas. Why is it better for you to hate than it is for him? Because you consider yourself to be superior and to be right.

     

    Lance, you should be worried, if you live in the U.S.A. Maybe if he didn't have a large audience for his stuff, then it wouldn't be doing any harm. But, when someone like him, that believe it or not, has great influence on americans, starts spreading racism, hate and etc. into the minds of some americans, we begin to feed the fire that caused racism in America all over.

     

    Wrong, your reasoning is flawed. He's not going to change any body's mind. Hes not going to convert anybody to his ideals. The only people who are going to agree and follow him are people that already have similar ideals. People are inherently racist. Hes not going to suddenly convert everybody to racism.

     

    Yes, he has the right to say WHATEVER he wants, as long as it is not a threat to national securtiy, but we still should worry of what he says, because IT DOES have an affect on many youths, who in return grow into racism, WHICH IS EVIL. And when I say evil, I don't mean heaven and hell evil, because everyone here knows I'm an atheist, but rather evil as in not good for humanity.

     

    Wrong again. The only kids who are going to listen to him are the kids who were taught by their PARENTS to be racist. Again, people do not suddenly change morals and ideals. This forum is proof; how many creationists have converted atheists? How many atheists have converted creationists? None. You underestimate the innate stubbornness of humans.

     

    The only problem comes in when parents are no longer parents and instead let their kids be raised by society. But, this isn't a problem with Crook, this is a problem with parents. I would be much more worried about the growing number of kids without parents than some idiot on the internet who is begging for attention (which many you happily give him).

  4. I admire Crook for speaking his mind (under his real name, no less) even as morons whine and write essays about it. If that makes me a Nazi then so be it.

     

    Nobody is force feeding his opinion to you. The ironic part is that the only people who are spreading it and giving the opinions publicity is you. Nobody else cares. Why don't you understand that if you stop spamming and whining that people like this go away? I....don't....care....about....Crook. Why do you?

  5. The problem is that just because somebody didn't intent for a comment to be rude doesn't actually mean it wasn't rude. I might consider your comment to be rude. Who is to decide what is rude and what is not? What if he considered the comments made by civil rights activists to be rude? Does that mean they should have been forced though lots of classes to enforce political correctness on them? It's just too subjective.

  6. It takes energy to make solar cells and batteries. The energy that is no longer being sent to your house is now being sent to the factories that are making the cells. You're not actually saving energy. Also, if demand goes up then cost also goes up which is one of the reasons you see gas prices rise after disasters.

  7. Actually, it does. Also, this is not crap and it is not incoherent. Try your kind of rhetoric on someone who is an idiot.

     

    No, this is what you don't understand. Nobody understands what you're talking about. The only person it is coherent to is you. And yet you still expect us all to nod in agreement and tell you how great your deductive reasoning is.

  8. You might think that. I don't. I am an adult survivor of child abuse. The focus on sex not only takes away from dealing with the abuse that I suffered' date=' it exacerbates the kind of abuse that I suffered. I know this subject from the inside. A lot of the pain and loss that I suffered started with people pretending to suspect that I was a sort of pervert. As I explained in another thread, I was a "faggot." You tell me how a six year old person who doesn't even know what sex is can be a "faggot." This is different from being a homosexual. Instead, the individual is a caricature of a homosexual. The mask is forced onto him and fastened as securely as they know how.

     

    The nature of the weapon that was used to destroy me is such that I cannot trust anyone who uses it. For my own survival, for the survival of decency, I have to destroy that weapon if I can. It is a weapon that destroys the person it is aimed at and the person who uses it.[/quote']

     

    Wow, I read this post multiple times and I still can't find any thing relevant to the conversation going on in this thread. Nobody here called you a fagot so stop being a martyr. I'm sorry for your traumatic childhood but simply having a traumatic childhood doesn't give you a license to spit out loads of incoherent crap and whine at everybody when they shy away from it.

  9. well' date=' he had X amount of days to know it was coming, forces should have been in that area before landfall (for a start).

    I should NOT be seeing ANY of what I`ve seen today on live TV after 5 days, NON of it.

    sure houses smashed to matchsticks etc... will take months or years to put right, but the People, the TAX payers.... naah it`s well wrong![/quote']

     

    I still don't understand, where would the troops have went? If they were in New Orleans they would have been skewered on top of telephone lines and crushed against brick walls. That's like saying we should mass our troops at a point we know a nuclear bomb is going to explode.

     

    We didn't even have that much preparation time, YT2095. When Katrina passed over Florida it was a category 1.

     

    The biggest problem is that we just don't have any way to get the people out. The only way would have been by helicopter which was being done until the rioting started. Now most of the New Orleans police are quiting and leaving; I can't say I blame them either. Can you Imagen trying to help the people in your home town only to have many of them shoot you? And I don't just mean random panicked shooting, a member of the national guard was shot in the leg when he was attempting to evacuate people from the superdome.

     

    This is just a bad situation, one of the largest storms in history hit the most vulnerable port in the gulf. London didn't sink 20' below the ocean after it was bombed. It wasn't completely destroyed either which is why you see new buildings mixed in with the old.

  10. I don't understand, YT2095, what else you expect Bush to do. There is NO possible way to fix this problem in 24 hours. Even if Bush used his magic wand to fix the levees it would still take MONTHS to drain the water alone. Do you think Bush should be swimming through the canal with a sandbag to help repair the levy?

     

    In New Orleans there are even more complications, such as criminals shooting at rescue helicopters and burning the remaining buildings. Do you expect Bush to grab a rifle and start shooting the citizens of New Orleans?

     

    For God's sake, what the hell do you want him to do?? I applaud Bush for what he has done thus far.

  11. "Artificial "curbs on greed" are just penalties for success' date=' and always lead to long-term trouble, not winning solutions."

    artificial? you sound like a capitalist. [/quote']

     

    What's the point of that last statement?

     

    I happen to agree, I personally don't have a problem with them making money off their success. We have absolute control over the situation. The answer is simple: if you think the price is too steep then stop buying it. The problem is that nobody is willing to go without oil; which obviously shows that the price really isn't that steep at all.

  12. Shoes! Why didn't I think of that!?

     

    Honestly though, I don't want a girl who is only attracted to a guy who wears name brand shoes and is a walking advertisement. I would really rather advertise myself rather than American Eagle or whatever ultra expensive brand is popular at the moment. And again, most of the girls who hang out at malls all weekend just aren't what I'm looking for... I think you're mistaking people who want a relationship with somebody who wants a one night stand.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.