nicke

@swansont

Replication can demonstrate what the utility or lack thereof of this device/process.

Spaceheater?  Perhaps.

@Strange

With all due respect, Strange, your certainty confuses me.  As does your quote of the data.  Elsewhere in the document find many runs where output exceeds input.  Read.

Bottom line, in my opinion, this needs verification.  Replication.

Thank you for sharing your perspective, Strange.

@swansont

Replication can demonstrate what the utility or lack thereof of this device/process might be.

Spaceheater?  Perhaps.  Paperweight?  At this juncture, Strange claims it is.

Apologies for putting words and thoughts into other posters.

https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTincreasede.pdf

Increased Excess Heat from Palladium Deposited on Nickel

Tadahiko Mizuno
Hydrogen Engineering Application and Development Company,
Kita 12, Nishi 4, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0012, Japan
head-mizuno@lake.ocn.ne.jp

Jed Rothwell
LENR-CANR.org,
1954 Airport Road, Suite 204, Chamblee, GA 30341, U.S.A.
JedRothwell@gmail.com

Abstract

We have developed an improved method of producing excess heat with nickel mesh coated with palladium. The new method produces higher power, a larger output to input ratio, and it can be controlled effectively. With 50 W of input, it produces ~250 W of excess heat, and with 300 W it produces ~2 to 3 kW. This paper is a comprehensive description of the apparatus, the reactant, and the method. We hope this paper will allow others to replicate the experiment. Keywords: Air flow calorimetry, Deuterium gas, Excess heat, Nickel reactant, Pd coating, Simple method.

nicke; I for one would be very interested in the aspects of design that are not apparent in the exploded view or video. I had always thought that the purpose of showing an exploded view was to make the entire mechanism visible.

The mechanism is entirely visible in the sense of exposure.

But the fine detail of the parts, their specifications, is not laid out.

They will show live testing which will clear up some things.

Merged post follows:

If it's not >100% efficiency, then it's not a proof of concept. I would call it a failed attempt at a proof of concept, if I was being charitable.

Your comments are premature.

An analysis of all the energies involved is necessary to give an informed opinion. This requires a level of detail not yet shared - masses, resistances, materials.

However. They will show more live testing soon.

Hello John.

Actually their proof of concept is quite efficient. The working principles are far afield from most electric motors.

It is true that the windings, like all windings, experience Joule heating.

However, when building one you do take this into account.

I am interested in discussing the various energies involved: electrical input, RKE, Joule heating, electrical output, and inductance.

Merged post follows:

It's still interesting they are generating torque while apparently not experiencing CEMF. Their motor must be novel in some way, because the current and voltage trace are not changing regardless of the speed of their system. I did some experiments the other night and the voltage/current of a system does indeed change as it speeds up or slows down under load. I do not understand why the Steorn system is not doing this.

 

I

It is because there are aspects of the design which are not apparent in the exploded view and in the videos.

These aspects are discussed in great detail in Steorn's private forum.

Your embodiment is lacking these aspects.

I know this because I am a member of the SKDB.

I can discuss issues related to energy auditing of the machines, if you are interested.