Jump to content

tar

Senior Members
  • Posts

    4341
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tar

  1. Area54,

     

    Well of course you are right, but your being right only is useful for your own dopamine to flow, it does not mean anything useful to our survival as individuals, or as a group or even as a planet.   But it shows that we, meaning you, can put ourselves in the shoes of somebody that would be pleased if the time 'till the end was lengthened.  Such a person is not currently available, so who is it, that would care if the universe lasted 600 billion years, or 600 billion years and a day.

    It comes down instead for your need to be right, for dopamine to flow, for you, for you to feel alive and OK and in control and "right".   This is perfectly understandable, perfectly allowed and something I have in common with you, this need.  But the point here, is not that the universe will end a day earlier because of life on Earth, the point is that there IS life on Earth, and that is a good thing, now.

     

    Regards, TAR

     

  2. 'Area54, 

     

    But your worrying about the demise of the universe, I think, is something that is also built in to our brain chemistry.  Consider how badly we would feel if the Earth was about to be destroyed by an asteroid.  Consider the joy and relief we would feel if we constructed a system to repel the thing away from collision.   I think we consider our lives precious.  And our families, and the life around us, which has also claimed fleeting victory over the tendencies of the universe.  And I know I do, and I expect you as well, consider the Milky Way "our" galaxy.   We care about it's future...even billions of years from now, when we won't be around and any precautions we might take against its demise would be inconsequential.

    Thing is, we feel this is our universe, because it is. 

    And we want to live forever.    'Cause we are addicted to life.

    Regards, TAR

  3. Area54,

    That was another part of my epiphany.  Treeness, from the first member of the species I was looking at, until and including the individual I was looking at was but a fleeting moment within the expanse of space and time that is reality.  That is why, especially why being alive is a victory.

    We are securely insolated from the beginning and the end by immense amounts of time, and likewise are insulated and protected from having to worry about the rest of the universe, by immense stretches of space.   Even the Sun, with us every day, is 7 minutes away at the speed of light.  A super nova could be happening right now in the Milky Way and we will not see the light or feel the gamma rays for up to 100,000 yrs, the place is so immense.

    So I would not worry about life speeding up the eventual heat spread of the universe.  

    Not an issue.

    Regards, TAR

     

  4. Dimreepr,

    Well you are right, the best way, and perhaps the only way to reset the line, is to stop doing the thing that you are obsessed with, that destructive thing, that gives you a good feeling, but for the wrong reasons.   Nicotine, for instance makes you feel good (provides dopamine) and makes you feel alive, but you are training your system to have you feel like you are surviving, and feeling good in a general, not for any particular reason, way.   Where enjoying life for its own rewards, is the way evolution has set the table, and things that feel right, that feel good, that give pleasure and make you smile and laugh and swell your heart with pride and accomplishment, actually ARE good things to promote and engage in.

    Survival of the fittest also includes actually fitting.  Feeling right, belonging, and feeling ownership and responsibility for the place, for your self and for those things included in your feeling of self.  I am thinking that the idea of self, is crucial to survival.  It is what delineates you from everything else and is the thing that is maintained when you survive.  Consider how good it feels to win.   And consider the food chain, where the winner is the eater and the loser is the eaten.  The one that wins is the one that survives, and every living thing tries to win.   

    The same chemicals that exist in the brain of a gambler when he wins, exist in the brain when using certain addictive drugs.

    And I have felt since I had an epiphany on a hilltop in Germany 40 years ago, that life is a victory over a universe that is otherwise heading toward entropy.   

    If living things did not want to survive, to be separate from and in opposition to general existence, they would not be.

    Regards, TAR

  5. Ten Oz,

    It was not political it was realistic.  If you strand a bunch of people on an island or on a continent, without food, water, shelter and medical assistance they are not going to do well.  Having one, or having 1000 is not going to make a difference.  They are only going to survive if somebody helps them, or they brought sufficient supplies(money) with them to live on or they turn into an invading army.  I am not sure you are allowed to make several leaps as to what my intentions are and my political beliefs.  My point was simply that we survive as a group, partially because of the investment in efforts of others.   I would not be able to go down to the store and buy food unless someone grew it and prepared it for me and put it on the shelves. 1

    You suggested 100 naked and afraid, would survive, where one would not.   I was giving an example where 1000 people sent into the wilderness are still naked and afraid and dependent on society for their survival, not on their instincts.

    Regards, TAR

     

     

  6. Ten Oz ,

    In the definitionn the example suggested that a person's consciousness could be raised.  That implies there is something about consciousness that can grow in scale, after birth, after the innate, built in, instinctual components of awareness of ones surroundings are set,  Where the interaction between said species and the environment adds to the built in senses and responses.

    Regards, TAR

     

  7. Ten Oz,

    Well with consciousness scale does matter, as is evident with the lists we saw earlier showing the number of neurons in various species.  The ones with more neurons were better candidates for having what we humans would call consciousness.

    If simple awareness of the environment around qualifies an entity as alive, the fact does not immediately equate to consciousness.  Sentience but not consciousness.  Consciousness I think does vary in scale.  What a university is capable of, over a 2 or three hundred year period, far exceeds the consciousness of any one professor.

    Regards, TAR

  8. Ten Oz,

    I think the dopamine reward for suicide can be understood in the same manner as one handles delayed gratification, and in the same manner as one gets pleasure from pleasing an unseen other, or themselves.

    Consider the situation is not only what dopamine is flowing in your head, but what dopamine is flowing in the head of a loved one.  As a survival thing, it is important for tribal members, extended family type tribes, to pass on their genes, protect their genes, please the others in the group.  Dopamine here is not isolated to one brain.  We seek the happiness of the clan.

    In terms of where you get dopamine by committing suicide, I think it has to do partly with control.   If you kill yourself you are exercising control over your own condition.  Usually I think suicide is committed in cases where the subject has lost control.  Lost a fortune, or a wife, or made some control ending mistake, as in on their way to a life in prison (after severely NOT pleasing society).  Or consider to Evgenia's point my dad's desire to not be a financial burden on his family and society when he is bedridden and failing. Not that he is going to commit suicide, but he has a directive to not extend his life artificially.  This gives him a certain control over a situation, life, that he is rapidly losing control of.  He can still actually get some dopamine considering leaving others in better shape than sucking up resources for little gain.

    Or consider suicide bombers, they are pleasing Allah, and those that are fighting for  Allah.   Or consider the millions waiting for rapture.  There is something built into us, that seeks pleasure for others, even if we rationally can not take part.   Like on purpose dropping a dollar, knowing that someone else's eyes will light up when they see it lost on the ground.   Or the people you hear of that leave gifts anonymously.  The pleasure is in the plan.

    Regards, TAR 

  9. Gee,

    Yes, nice response.   It is important I think to consider instinct and consciousness together as not separate things, and to understand the chemical mechanics of the thing, but to understand a chemical. like you say as a drop of water.  You need the drop to make a cup of water or a lake, or a river, or an ocean, but the useful understanding is not that H20 or NaCl is present, but whether you are likely to run into a jellyfish if you were to go swimming.  That is, a holistic view of the thing is preferable to a formulae.  Mechanically you can or should be able to piece together the chemicals to describe the activity, but it seems in human terms, we should talk in metaphor and speak about emotion as if it is the same thing as the chemical and physical complex that creates it.

    When we talk about humans, we are not talking about a simple mass of billions of neurons with various neurotransmitters floating about within the cells and synapses...well we are, but that is just the drop, not the context.  In amongst the folds are dreams and hopes and memories, and promises and expectations...emotions, that are as hard to describe in chemical and physical terms as a hurricane is to describe using just air and water and heat.

    Ten Oz,

    I think an ant is part of a colony.  The entity, the self, we are talking about, with ants, I think is the colony, not the ant.  Sort of like the ants are cells or organs within the entity, that are connected by chemical trails, not sinews and fibers, muscle and bone.

    Perhaps people are a little like this as well.  We each are a separate ant, but attached to those we love into a greater being.  To this, and the thread title, you can not have this greater being, without the individuals that compose it, and you can not have either without instinct and consciousness, emotion and thought.

    Regards, TAR

     

  10. dimreepr,

    Good way to look at it.   

    I have this problem with my dopamine theory, that says you can replace your drug of choice with other natural good clean fun types of things, getting into a giggle fest with your kids or going to a concert with a multi-instrument orchestra, or even, for full cup recognition, having an orgasm, but the problem with drug addicts is they have busted the system, and the neurotransmitters don't flow, or don't replicate the "feeling" of being alive, naturally any more, and it takes 6 months or never to get the system back to where a giggle fest does the job.

    But here my theory might be useful to recovering addicts in that it is probably better, in terms of getting your system back to gigglefest fighting weight, to not have your neurotransmitters balajnced by a doctor and pharmaceutical company, but to have your friends and family and friends and society, do the job.

    I guess I am talking about dependency.  If you are relying on someone else to provide you with a reason to live, the ability to live and you are dependent on a drug to make you feel right, you have not actually succeeded in living, you are dependent on someone else to tell you how to live and are sort of a ward of the state.

    Consider as proof of this, how people under treatment with inhibitors and dopamine enhancers and serotine blockers and such have to be constantly monitored and the chemical balance has to be adjusted to where they are not too high or two low.  Seems to me to be better to try and work away from the drugs entirely and let the body and brain operate.  Feel pain when tissue damage is imminent or real, so that your body reacts to the situation.  Gets you out of there, and puts you in a more comfortable place, or provided the healing chemicals to repair the damage inflicted.  Not to take on a silly approach as to say no chemicals are good, just to use the great chemicals we have where indicated, and NOT use them to fool the system into a response that is possibly not completely accurate for the situation.   For example, Chantax to help quit smoking makes many people "feel weird". And some have thoughts of suicide or find they do not enjoy other things they used to enjoy, as much.   Why not just don't let nicotine into your body for a bit, and see that you don't actually die, and you can still laugh and smile and hug and kiss your mate and family and find enjoyment in life, as it was before you smoked

    So, as you say, reset the cup full line, but do it by filling the cup with dopamine achieved through victory and completion and scratching the itch, not dopamine achieved through ingesting nicotine (opioid).

    Regards, TAR

  11. Dimreepr,

    My thoughts lately are all toward how neurotransmitters affect us, and how one can understand others, and oneself in terms of the human need for dopamine.

    The human reward system is a complex of desire, motivation and reward that gives a need to move, an impulse to move, and a reward to move so we repeat the action when confronted with the same situation,  thereby surviving and feeling good about it, so we do it again and again, continuously.  So goes my dopamine theory.

    This complex has been studied and identified as including various agents like GABA, adrenaline  and others, but can be simplified as to including norepinephrine, serotonin and dopamine.  Enough to understand the situation as getting an itch, moving to scratch it, and having it feel good to have gotten the bloodsucking bug off, so-to-speak.

    My concern, in the field of mental health and addiction treatment is that addiction is considered a disease, when I think it completely natural, and not only natural but at the basis of our survival instinct and seems to be associated with the survival instinct of other animals and many neurotransmitters are even found in plants which means the plants either produce them so animals feel good eating them so they eat them again to spread their seeds, or that the plants themselves use the chemicals to establish need to move (will to live), movement (living, growing, being) and reward for moving (survival).

    Hence my concern.  If we mess with the reuptake of these chemicals, we don't know how that is going to work out.  Plenty of evidence in this article of causing depression and suicide and other unintended consequences, to consider that when you mess with these chemicals, you mess with our survival instinct, our life and consciousness itself and are "playing god" with another's consciousness in a way that no person, subject to the same norepinephrine-dopamine-serotonin complex themselves is really qualified to administer.

    See our current mental health and drug addiction problem in the U.S. for evidence that we don't know what we are doing to ourselves.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serotonin–norepinephrine–dopamine_reuptake_inhibitor

    Serotonergic[edit]

    5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT or serotonin) is an important cell-to-cell signaling molecule found in all animal phyla. In mammals, substantial concentrations of 5-HT are present in the central and peripheral nervous systems, gastrointestinal tract and cardiovascular system. 5-HT is capable of exerting a wide variety of biological effects by interacting with specific membrane-bound receptors, and at least 13 distinct 5-HT receptor subtypes have been cloned and characterized. With the exception of the 5-HT3 receptor subtype, which is a transmitter-gated ion channel, 5-HT receptors are members of the 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. In humans, the serotonergic system is implicated in various physiological processes such as sleep-wake cycles, maintenance of mood, control of food intake and regulation of blood pressure. In accordance with this, drugs that affect 5-HT-containing cells or 5-HT receptors are effective treatments for numerous indications, including depression, anxiety, obesity, nausea, and migraine.

     

    Regards, TAR

    It is actually alright to feel good about living.   In fact it is required for survival.  It is not a disease.

     

     

  12. 19 hours ago, Area54 said:

     have noted, over the years, that people identify problems and solutions on the basis of their experience and knowledge. That's hardly surprising, but it is rare that they then modify their conclusions in the light of this specific knowledge.

    Shorter version: "Yes, but...." f

    Area54,

    Noted, but modifying your conclusions to suit yourself is done all the time.

    Rationalization is something I became aware of, as a thing particularly self related.  That is we look for the silver lining or the way that the unfortunate situation could be framed to still wind up with us winning, and feeling good about the situation.  (getting some dopamine)  Like when my Yankees lose, I figure its only a game, and maybe we will win the next one.  Or when the squirrels get every one of my pears off the three trees we have, I figure, at least the squirrels got to enjoy the seeds.  And make a joke of it, after realizing they are not after the fruit, but the seeds, that if only they had come to me beforehand, I would gladly have arranged a spot where we would put all the cores after we enjoyed the fruit and everybody would win.  

    And we are all good at accepting loss...eventually, that is we understand that life goes on, even after a failure and there will be another chance at victory.

    And likewise, there is the sour grape thing, where if we fail to reach the goal, we rationalize that the goal was not a good one to begin with.

    Or the addict, obviously knowing that doing the drug is not beneficial overall proceeds to acquire and use the drug anyway because it will "feel" like a victory.

    When I quit smoking, with the support of people on this board several years ago, after smoking for 47 years, I went through several rationalizations.  The primary one, was that if I was sitting on a lung machine, confined to a bed, unable to take a deep full breath, I would be very unhappy with myself for putting myself in that quite unpleasant position.  So I took a delayed gratification type approach and told myself if I refrained from smoking I would be rewarded with deep breaths for a long time.  Turns out to have been the case, and I received some dopamine, some victory dopamine just by NOT smoking.  Another rationalization I was going through while deciding to quit was that I was going to suffer various maladies and losses if I did not smoke.  Couldn't take a break and go outside,  would smell things and jog my memory and lose concentration, would have no punctuation marks in my day, little interim rewards, interim victories, to get me through obnoxiously detailed procedures,  would get upset with people more easily and the biggest thought, the biggest problem as to why quitting might be detrimental, is that I thought I would never feel good, the way an after lunch cigarette made me feel, ever again.   Well it turned out another rationalization countered this thought, when I learned that nicotine receptors in your brain receive the nicotine and release dopamine.  Same exact dopamine that is released anytime you do this life thing right.  Hug a child, feed your family, pay the rent, look at your wife's beautiful face, take out the garbage, straighten the picture on the wall, solve a problem,  root your team to victory, play a tune on the violin, smell the butter and garlic frying up the onions, snuggle in the chair and close your eyes after successful completion of a project...100 ways to get dopamine, meant that it was not that I would never feel good again, it was that since I was taking Phi's advice, and was making smoking "not an option" and I was expanding that to making nicotine "not an option", it meant simply that I was not going to have "that way" of getting dopamine anymore, but I still had complete access to every other way of getting dopamine, that did not involve nicotine.  Same dopamine.  Just cut out the middle man. (the one I was dependent on for my dopamine)

    Regards, TAR 

     

  13. But good to note that we all, have or do have a number of ways to enjoy life, and get our dopamine.  It seems to be quite natural a thing.  Although I gave up drinking while in the Army in Germany 36 or 37 years ago, I did consume my lifetime quota of alcohol beforehand.

  14. dimreepr,

    I started this topic to discuss consciousness and instinct from the dopamine perspective, as to not derail or hijack Ten Oz's thread.

    But crucial to me is to gain understanding of our common addiction to dopamine, and to praise it for its value in terms of our enjoyment of life, our desire to fix things, to improve things, to create things, to complete things, to please others, etc. in terms of how we like to do these things, enjoy these things and aim to do them again, hence survive, but to be conscious as well of the downsides of dopamine, where we can overeat certain quickly metabolized wheat starches and watch too much TV and gain our dopamine rushes in dangerous. destructive and unsavory, expensive (unlawful) and harmful ways, to the detriment of our own selves and those around us.

    Regards, TAR

  15. Ed Earl,

     

    I agree people are nuanced and complex.  And nobody can tell somebody else what should or is going to make them happy, feel right, feel alive and OK. But in my readings and discussions, with professional in the field of addiction, through my association to both a town alliance and a county prevention organization, I know that dopamine plays a role, both in human happiness and motivation and purpose, and in addiction.  The common element goes directly to the OP.   No matter how you were brought up, educated, socialized and no matter who it is you wish to please in your actions and thoughts and plans, you are operating in order to obtain dopamine, and this fact is completely outside human planning.  That is it is built in, innate, instinctual stuff, that exists in Ed Earl, and Ten Oz and TAR and anybody and everybody else, and possibly to certain degrees in animals, and maybe even plants.

    So through consciousness and thought and agreement and institutions we can decide which ways of surviving, of feeling right, of feeling victorious are preferable to others, but nobody can shake the need to survive, to want that feeling of dopamine existing in your synapses.  It is built in.

    Regards, TAR

  16. Evginia,

    I like your approach.  We have many ways to obtain dopamine, free and easy, or at least inexpensive, and readily available, legal, helpful to others or unobtrusive to others, ways.

    So good approach.

    However, I am mixed on providing dopamine, and blockers and reuptake inhibitors and such in a mechanical, chemical approach.  I don't think our consciousness is clever enough to out think our own subconscious, much less someone else's.  Consider the oxycodone problem came about because the medical profession wanted to lessen human pain and suffering.  We technically have the way to provide dopamine in a safe manner.  Except providing it too much makes it an unwise method.   Better not to fool with mother nature, and just feel bad when you are hurt. and feel good when you have healed.  In moderation of course.  Fentanyl was made for people in severe pain dying of cancer, to make their last moments of life bearable.  It might be highly inappropriate to apply this satisfaction mid stream, since you have not actually reached the other shore, there is no useful reason to feel that way ahead of time.

     

    I learned that addicts in withdrawal feel like they are dying, feel like they are not surviving, feel that the only option, to stay alive is to get their drug of choice.  They will steal money from their mom's purse to buy another hit.   Not good to be able to buy happiness like this, to buy the feeling that you are alive.  Better to have good, clean fun. And MUCH better to actually engage in behaviors that help yourself and your family and your team and your company and your friends and your school and your church and your neighborhood and your county and your state and your country and your species survive.  Then the dopamine you get, for pleasing yourself and your loved ones is real and actually works toward survival, as its supposed to.

    Regards, TAR

    Karl Marx I think it was, called religion the opiate of the masses. Perhaps today opioids are the opiate of the masses.  Wrong I think to make others dependent on you for their survival/happiness, unless of course they are your loved ones.   Perhaps it was wrong to provide our inner cities with crack instead of jobs.  Two ways to provide happiness, or the feeling of, but one way slavery and the other is freedom.  

     

     

  17. Evginia,

    I like your approach.  We have many ways to obtain dopamine, free and easy, or at least inexpensive, and readily available, legal, helpful to others or unobtrusive to others, ways.

    So good approach.

    However, I am mixed on providing dopamine, and blockers and reuptake inhibitors and such in a mechanical, chemical approach.  I don't think our consciousness is clever enough to out think our own subconscious, much less someone else's.  Consider the oxycodone problem came about because the medical profession wanted to lessen human pain and suffering.  We technically have the way to provide dopamine in a safe manner.  Except providing it too much makes it an unwise method.   Better not to fool with mother nature, and just feel bad when you are hurt. and feel good when you have healed.  In moderation of course.  Fentanyl was made for people in severe pain dying of cancer, to make their last moments of live bearable.  It might be highly inappropriate to apply this satisfaction mid stream, since you have not actually reached the other shore, there is no useful reason to feel that way ahead of time.

     

    I learned that addicts in withdrawal feel like they are dying, feel like they are not surviving, feel that the only option, to stay alive is to get their drug of choice.  They will steal money from their mom's purse to buy another hit.   Not good to be able to buy happiness like this, to buy the feeling that you are alive.  Better to have good, clean fun. And MUCH better to actually engage in behaviors that help yourself and your family and your team and your company and your friends and your school and your church and your neighborhood and your county and your state and your country and your species survive.  Then the dopamine you get, for pleasing yourself and your loved ones is real and actually works toward survival, as its supposed to.

    Regards, TAR

     

  18. Ed Earl,

     

    I agree people are nuanced and complex.  And nobody can tell somebody else what should or is going to make them happy, feel right, feel alive and OK. But in my readings and discussions, with professional in the field of addiction, through my association to both a town alliance and a county prevention organization, I know that dopamine plays a role, both in human happiness and motivation and purpose, and in addiction.  The common element goes directly to the OP.   No matter how you were brought up, educated, socialized and no matter who it is you wish to please in your actions and thoughts and plans, you are operating in order to obtain dopamine, and this fact is completely outside human planning.  That is it is built in, innate, instinctual stuff, that exists in Ed Earl, and Ten Oz and TAR and anybody and everybody else, and possibly to certain degrees in animals, and maybe even plants.

    So through consciousness and thought and agreement and institutions we can decide which ways of surviving, of feeling right, of feeling victorious are preferable to others, but nobody can shake the need to survive, to want that feeling of dopamine existing in your synapses.  It is built in.

    Regards, TAR

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.