4 minutes ago, Sensei said:

It is an engine that uses liquid hydrogen and oxygen. To produce liquid hydrogen, human convert methane or use water electrolysis. To produce liquid oxygen, human cool the air to a temperature sufficient to liquefy the gases present, or use electrolysis of water and then cool it. Either way, it is a very energy-intensive process.

It's about the outcome, if more energy can be harnessed then going in, then it's worth doing.

Quote

While only lasting a millisecond, a flash of lightning is thought produce up to 10 gigawatts (GW) of electricity, which would be a sixth of the capacity of all the rooftop solar panels in the U.S. in 2021.

Take it one step further.

Quote

Cumulonimbus clouds are menacing looking multi-level clouds, extending high into the sky in towers or plumes. More commonly known as thunderclouds, cumulonimbus is the only cloud type that can produce hail, thunder and lightning.

Have a Cloud generator machine in the Air generate Cumulonimbus clouds.  Then, absorb the Lightning somehow.

Mine will be a Stealth Suit for the Working Class's Price Range.

I thought of an improvement.

The 360 Degree camera will have Eyelids made of two way glass which will blink.

This will solve Insects standing on the spherical Lens.

Apparatus

Full body Green Morph Suit

Green Screen Cape

360 Degree Camera on top

Operational

The 360 degree Camera records Live footage at 60 frames per second

It projects the Live feed to the Green Screen Cape

Front of Camera projects to the back of the cape, back of the Camera projects to the front of the cape

Never heard of them.

What are you gonna do with the 120 million yen?

3D Shadows of 4th Spatial Dimension Space-TIme Cubes

https://www.vrham.de/en/quantum-tesseract/

Oh my goshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

It's Gravity isn't it!!!!!!!!!!!

Space-time is cubical. Gravity is  outside our dimension which then  folds Space-Time insideout.

46 minutes ago, Mordred said:

 

ct,x,y,z

 

Done there is your 4 spatial components using interval for time. Is there some way  you can think of to  make that statement more intuitive ?

Normalize the units

c=ℏ=g=k=1

and the majority of your equations are far easier to work with.

Mr Mr Mr. Take a leaf out of Salvador Dalí's Book. Leave Time at the decontamination shower.

All I'm interested in, is w, x, y, z.

Interestingly enough, I watched a Netflix documentary about Oragami, there was a quote on there that I liked. 'Each fold is a new memory'

1 hour ago, Mordred said:

Your really are not grasping the time component. It is not a spatial dimension. We use an interval to measure the rate of signals between observer and emitter via (ct) which gives dimensionality equivalence to length but time itself has no spatial dimension.

So modelling time using a tesseract or any other 3d object with an secondary object that can shift is not the same thing as time. Yes you can use 4 dimensions to describe the tesseract but it's simply 2 3d objects with a degree of movement of the secondary object that is independent of the main 3d object.

That has nothing to do with time which is a property describing rate of change.

 

Mr Mr Mr. I appreciate that you are referring to Time. However; I Am only concerned with the Spatial Dimension.

1 hour ago, swansont said:

So, nothing authoritative. Just some guy on a different discussion board, being partly wrong.

And nothing for the second quote.

The second quote is me agreeing with you.

1 hour ago, Phi for All said:

It's only a "cross" if you glue that extra cube on the bottom and get Jesus involved.

Salvador Dalí is keeping this Thread highbrow.

On 6/20/2024 at 10:44 PM, swansont said:

You haven’t defined what you mean by “turned inside out”

You haven’t addressed issues others have raised.

I have found the word, Folding.

On 6/21/2024 at 12:04 AM, Mordred said:

The tesseract does nothing with regards to the claims you made above. We are all aware of the tesserect. There is literally nothing new about it. 

 

The Tesseract is a folded inside out 3D Omnidirectional Cross shape.

Crucifixion (Corpus Hypercubus)

On 6/19/2024 at 12:28 PM, swansont said:

You put these statements in quotation marks. What is the source?

Quantum tunneling is not electron excitation

https://thesciencespace.quora.com/The-shadow-of-3D-object-is-2D-then-is-the-shadow-of-4D-object-is-3D-Why-or-why-not

Ok

The Tesseract Net only becomes a Tesseract once it is turned inside out.

Edit: I found this then thought I'd share it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercubane

4th dimension (Inside out Dimension)

'4D objects cast 3D shadows when observed' Well naturally if observed, an inside out object casts a 3D shadow.

'Quantum tunneling, Electron gains more energy, couples with an Electrons in a higher energy orbit, then emitts a Photon as it goes back down to its original orbit.'

Now; If you think of this Electron as expressing its Volume outwardly, the more energy it has, the more Volume it has, which means it's technically INSIDE the Electon in the higher orbit.

The Photon emitted is equivalent to it coming OUT from the Electron in the higher orbit.

9 hours ago, Mordred said:

You don't solve anything involving geometry unless your applying the mathematics.

Without math everything is simply wildly imaginative assertions.

Quote

3. In cases where math may not be required, you still need to be able to make predictions that distinguish your idea from existing theories

Eureka!

I was thinking on it then out of nowhere I came up with something that can be tested.

Right now as I type this I do not know the answer, I have yet to even look into it.

Do Quantumly entangled particles emit virtual Photons after they become unentangled? I predict that they do. I predict this as I now believe that they are VIRTUALLY INSIDE eachother. Then they VIRTUALLY come OUT from eachother.

Quote

1. If you are presenting some new conjecture and insisting that it is correct, or are objecting to some mainstream theory, you need to back up your position and will be expected to do so. It's a far better approach to ask questions if it's a matter of not understanding how some scientific principle works.

Once you insist your idea is right (or some other idea is wrong) the burden of proof is on you

The Tesseract for example expresses its Volume outside

Quote

3. In cases where math may not be required, you still need to be able to make predictions that distinguish your idea from existing theories

The Klien bottle is a true 4D object which can only exist in 4D. It is both inside and out. 'Because the inside part and outside parts of the tube are connected together, the Klein bottle really has only one side. '

Where as a 3D Cube put into 4D turns itself inside out. A true 4D shape is already inside out.

Quote

4. It's a good idea to explain what new ground you're covering if it's a new hypothesis,

They say it will take a lot of imagination to solve 4D, I may have done just that.

______________________________________________________________4D Edit: (as) the inside out of 3D

Where are the fields in Physics?

On the outside.

Gravitational field. Electromagnetic field.

There are no Knots in 4D, why? 

Quote

In four or more dimensions (as it turns out) there is enough "space" to untie any knot, that is smoothly transform it into a circle. It's important to note that only 1D strings can't be knotted in 4D

Isn't an inside out Knot the same as an untied Knot?

On 3/26/2024 at 1:30 PM, dimreepr said:

Looks like you didn't read the thread, oh the irony... 🙄 

You do a 'Too long didn't read' then. I just read the Thread OP 1st post just now and I can't make head to tail of it.

On 3/23/2024 at 7:12 PM, Guille Yacante said:

I am 27 years old, I only finished high school, but I have found the cure of autism and a lot of chronic illnesses.

Do a 'Too long didn't read' answer to what causes Autism please.

1 minute ago, ahmet said:

what you ask is not understandable in the thread text. But to reply just to the title, that is not the doable thing in my prediction or seems like an invalid /unapplicable question. Because the golde ratio is a number. 

I want to see where the verticle line of the golden ratio divides the IQ graph.

Quote

You take a line and divide it into two parts – a long part (a) and a short part (b). The entire length (a + b) divided by (a) is equal to (a) divided by (b). And both of those numbers equal 1.618. So, (a + b) divided by (a) equals 1.618, and (a) divided by (b) also equals 1.618.

What does it look like / how long does it take when the constructive Inteference pattern on the board behind the slits become two horrizontal bands?

Is there a Video of this moment?

I haven't read any of this but, considering the Universe and the Brain are similar structures AND I believe in Ghosts, it doesn't seem too much of a stretch to me that IF God was real, Science would find 'em.

I would like to see a comparison of Truth tables vs Logic gates using Water flow

Probably because a Photon is its own anti-particle

Quote

What Bible verse says Jesus was a carpenter?

 

 

His trade is unmentioned in stories concerning Joseph, admittedly few. Only twice is the word carpenter used in the Christian scriptures: when Jesus is identified as “the carpenter's son” (Matt. 13:55) and “the carpenter” (Mark 6:3).

Would any of the Son of God's: Chairs, Tables, Three Legged Bar Stools  among other things remain intact today?