IDoNotCare

If you have a spacecraft made of a fence of nanorods only a few atoms thick made of carbon nanotubes, it can be miles long and contain that much material in an ion drive to release just a few atoms at a time, and the craft would be so light that the only mass youre moving is the fuel for ionization itself, which means even if the craft is miles long it can constantly accelerate for centuries because of how much fuel it holds, and accelerate fast because the only real mass is the material being ionized.

This was going to end up here anyway.

Using plancks constant times the grav constant over c^3 for lp and 5th power for lt I multiplied 9^28 into it as the numerator and it equated to the planck mass and when divided by the wavelength of a photon I got the planck density synonymous with the planck temperature. That is, irrc. I have it all written down.

Anyway what is being said is that there is a limit to gravitation where the planck time is exceeded there is a recurring rescaling of c and the planck constants at 1/9^28th scale in the singularity collapse where the material achieved stability again. At half that miniaturized recursive constants volume, we picture a collection of reduced (by a factor of 9 to the 28th magnitude) subplanck spheres as sterile neutrinos that cross into each other's radii thus becoming twice as thick in a subplanck time unit. This can be represented as the center of an expanding quantum gw grav wave that moves those neutrinos around. In that pool break of a restabilized (ie no longer collapsing) singularity Nova you have the initial conditions of a big bang, mathematically, with those neutrinos being planck scale spheres composing quarks and electrons and the like later on sort of as a replacement of string bodies that are spherical objects instead.

Where the central coordinates of enough quantum grav waves coalesce at the same coordinates with one another the grav pull can build up past 1 planck length in less than a planck time at certain parts of the pool break. This is a singularity itself, these objects form in motion as a direct collapse clouds in the quark gluon plasma of the cmbr artifact into primordial smbhs that are themselves bodies in motion which stay in motion pulling surrounding material connected by centrifugal DM creating the expansion as they drag the material outward with that line of staying motion (DE) forming the galaxies.

Anyway, I have the specific coordinates, and if you get the initial size of that singularity when it stabilized just right you have the exact real universe represented in those specific values or bits for those coordinates so you can be certain of the electrons in the human brains positions while at the same time being certain of their trajectories because you know their causal origins from the time of the big bang for certain individuals which is crucial in the bio-electric signals during neuron replacement with electronic substrates for digital immortalization.

Very important set, topology, matrix simulation, etc. I have specific instructions and proofs although on a small scale of the the 4D topology. Those sets are the million dollar proofs I hold. 

1 hour ago, John Cuthber said:

 

Are you volunteering to go up against the guns first?
If not, you understand why we are still talking about money.

 

 

It's quite close to being the same thing.

I have had a few demonstrations against their law enforcement, your turn

We aren't going to get the land with peaceful shouting lol

Don't just physically stand up against taxation and enforcement of petty majority census using posturing or violence. There are all kinds of ways we can do what Karesh couldn't and get some land and flesh back from the populace.

These last few days it's been insomnia from lack of stimulus and worry and anxiety, coupled with when I do get to sleep there's zero incentive for me to even get up other than the fact that I can't sleep. Right to pursuit of happiness my dick.

And why aren't sexual services a requirement if other forms of public service are? Instead of starving a carved figure out and requiring our youth the get themselves out there we are basically making it illegal or not something to profit from (quite the contrary) sending the message of repression in brain training there's a hostile reaction to that sort of disenforcement. Instead we are encouraging our youth to get fat and be inert, we are that is a big portion of public service is force feeding and advertising food

Is that really the majority census

Get real

This census enforced by cowardly killers with tech, is about as fun as a dried up bag of Biden dicks 

I don't understand why we are still talking pro currency pro politics pro free trade economy here 

Venus project

It's as if everything I said here, the topic about moneyless society I schooled INow in, my Venus project thread, etc never happened when you bring up the tri branch feds why are they still in charge, military might ?

As Jim Morrison said, they got the guns but we got the numbers gonna win yeah we are taking over

Yet the only riots have been about skin pigment not anti class warfare

Yet the only riots have been about skin pigment not anti class warfare taxation is theft!

On 8/3/2020 at 2:09 AM, bob campbell said:

According to this video 1:24:00). < hperlink .

If someone is a very long distance away and they reverse their direction of travel from away from me toward me, their experience of time is supposed to switch from my past to my future.

I have been trying to understand why their direction of travel makes this difference. How this is possible?

He's talking about time dilation. If you have a relativistic object events outside of that object occur more quickly so that object is sort of stuck in the past. Now reversing direction at those extreme relativistic speeds length contraction reverses so the object experiences length dilation and time contraction so time relative to that object occurs much faster than outside that object so long as it is decelerating from relativistic speeds.

That's actually a proposed way for a spacecraft to buy back time lost due to time dilation

11 minutes ago, iNow said:

Where and how does one obtain all of the equipment and support required to offer that protection without money, and what of the food? Wouldn’t those animals be less endangered if the people hunting them had other steady sources of income and security?

🙄

They acquire these things from resources and garnering willpower or effort. Money is why endangered animals are worth more which gives incentive to hunt them so throwing money at the problem is a joke and a prime example of how counterproductive the whole idea is.

For instance, instead of throwing money to help endangered animals what they really need is someone to protect them or adopt them and feed them, the money actually does nothing by itself. By itself it may not even give incentive.

Just now, iNow said:

Rubbish. We do things because of dopamine and serotonin. End program. Money is a tool which enhances the odds of receiving the effect of both. 

And yet the whole point is to rise above our basal urges.

2 minutes ago, iNow said:

I have no interest in trading rice and cows for help building a shed or in exchange for a few hours of internet access with someone who still says whacked in 2020. You may just starve given your recalcitrance, especially since the ability to barter begins with the ability to form trusting bonds. At least money reduces this type of friction and allows for enhanced survival by greater numbers, but you obviously are blind to this (and surely a great many other things too long to list). 

The question is should you even do this and that, and why. Not do you have enough money to do it. Money takes away from reason, you do it because you were given imaginary incentive to do it.

15 minutes ago, MigL said:

Money is a tool, and monetary systems are institutions.
Tools can be used irresponsibly, and institutions can be used by unscrupulous people to take advantage of others.
So, is the problem with money and its institutions, or with unscrupulous people ?

Good to read your opinions again Ten oz.
Welcome back buddy.

Well if it can be used irresponsibly than Murphy's law says it will be used irresponsibly so the whole idea is whacked imho

35 minutes ago, naitche said:

Curious- Is Space considered a physical thing?

I think reality itself is composed of space and a gravitational wave stems from two or more planck spaces, or neutrinos, overlapping. When the centers of two or more planck gravitons have the same coordinates, it is a black hole until the next planck time where the strength of the two gravitons halves. Of course photons interact as energy or temperature values, as two gravitational waves cross radii with centers neutralizing the charge of gravitons or annihilating opposite charges or same charge from opposite direction.

If you think about it when a black hole forms, the singularity might actually jump into the future and expand back in time as fractal neutrinos inside of it pass through one another creating a microverse of gravitons until it is just black holes which were the centers of the gravitons produced by the neutrino preons of the star that collapsed into that black hole.

And at the moment after that jump forward in time, the spheres of space fall away from one another as isolated 3d objects whose outcome or origin would be the result of having spheres crushed into circles and circles split into curves and curves unbent into lines and lines reduced to points which all occurs in lower dimensions outside of time as the inevitable outcome of geometrized Murphy's law

There are all kinds of atoms, elementary and composite particles, that we don't know about, that could be recreated by a mathematical big bang as well as their particle pair production moments, positions and trajectory in the propagating quantum gravitational waves 

It's like opening a game of pool, the big bang set in shape a series of reactions that had a fracture point of all the matter

I don't believe in a brain anatomy problem more of a hivemind deciding who gets what and the result I think is pretty ridiculous

The only crimes occur cause our nanites are suckier than theirs. If I had better nanites I'd have another form I could use to help myself

They give guns to white people too. In fact all cops carry guns.

12 minutes ago, studiot said:

More particularly you singled out the physical which is why I asked why you though it made a difference.

 

Does it make any difference to free will, self or consciousness whether they are 'physical' or not?

Well you could be dating someone online but have no physical relationship in which case that someone is most definitely getting some from someone else in the physical plane

From the time we're born we develop distinct personalities. How do you think that is, why aren't we just replicants or copies? Something is going on, more so in primates, neanderthals, than in lizards personalities become more dynamic.

If our electrons are really entangled it is possible that an abstract entity can in fact hack our biological mainframe and design personas.

This subjective census, while it is my perception, is what keeps me from mating. It's risky to find a mate, it should be that I have their visouspatial cortex attached to my I eye . To my mind's eye, I mean, imagine being able to use two bodies at once, much less two minds at once. With entanglement this may already be happening yet the individuals have a separated identity and their purpose becomes to seek their other pair so to speak. But Genghis Kahn consumed all the pairs for himself.

Then there's the wonders of cybernetic organs and in another thread I talked about not just uploading the human mind but surgically replacing it with something better without disrupting one's continuity of consciousness.

I know the simulation coordinates evolving change is time in a 4th dimension in non-flat spherical space, I mean I know one way to show express the coordinates for a simulation of the big bang, the trick is some zero d coordinates are closer than others or further away and one needs to be able to show that disparity of depths with ones and zeros. There's so many changing coordinates, and so many possible deviations depending on if this is a stellar mass singularity or a dark star smbh singularity our universe is somewhere in-between.

But I know how to use grav and planck constants over c cubed and to the 5th for that 9^28 • radio wavelength for mass particles to become an event horizon, and then again with the •9^28 density before the singularity goes Nova in a fractal universe

1 hour ago, Strange said:

Your "original details" are science-fiction word-said. There is nothing to counter there.

But conservation laws and thermodynamics prove your idea cannot work.

 

1. What details are you referring to?

2. Again, can you give me an example where the thermodynamics are broken, other than "getting more energy in than out" you're avoiding the specific mechanisms involved. Let's start with beam narrowing for example. It was demonstrated that it's possible to narrow and it was shown that this made the beam hotter. Perhaps it was the conversion of a dipole moment in a thermodynamic black hole to beam concentration by ballistic resonance? What details are we applying the laws of conservation? Which laws of conservation!?

There's plenty context in the details to counter-argue

21 minutes ago, Strange said:

This is off-topic. (And, again, what you believe or think, without evidence, is irrelevant anyway.)

Nevermind

This kind of subject is pointless to debate. More for a chat with a friend.

1. I think it's possible, err, likely that the subatomic components involved in the chemical interactions between human or animal synapses could be all be entangled. If you take all the electrons influenced by the chemicals in a synaptic signal, that's one of quadrillion bits, a qudit. If you have two entangled bits in two different brains, that's a qubit, now we are talking parallel operations, or cross talk between a signal involved in the executive functions of one person and a signal involved in the executive functions in another person. Now there are qutrits, ququadrits, and so on. 

Another way to look at the perceptual parameters of such an abstract entity is to close one eye and use the other to peer down at your nose and you cannot see what's on the other side, now open both eyes and use that same eye to peer at your nose from the same angle and you can see what's on the other side of it. And if you cross eyes to peer at your nose you will see two of them. Now imagine the pictures, sounds, smells, feeling (pain, relaxation) being caught in a mind that actually can distinguish the individual sources and locations of a mesh of every lifeform on the planet and potentially other planets, simultaneously. 

2. I also think it's possible that, based on theories and ideas liken to things anywhere from Fermi's paradox and the Drake equation, to Ray Kurzweils human 2.0 to self-replicating nanoswarms of Von Neumann Probes that an alien artificial intelligence could arrive here, gray goo the planet and restrict access to certain sights, sounds, or capabilities to it's inhabitants being trapped in a matrix as unaware transhumans just to store data in our bodies. So we think we are made of cells when really we wouldn't be able to know the difference so neither would said collective abstract entity.

1 is what you're thinking of, 2 is better.

5 hours ago, MigL said:

Soooo ...
You want to discuss a bad movie ?

I just want to know why apartment policy, tax collectors, a mortgage company, get to have armed thugs when someone doesn't pay even if he's non-violent and has no thugs of his own. Taxation is theft, it's not your home if you have to pay for it. So it really comes to the police who choose to respond to those calls and the blame also goes to the government that said such things go. We're basically going back to ancient Rome where anything goes to enforce policy. Didn't build it, got in somehow, people who won't leave or work until they feel safe. My America.

Another problem I have is lives in such situations, which police are specifically not trained handle home seizures because now where getting into the feds where there really is no other reason than more dumb people said it's okay to remove all non-payers where smarter people wouldn't have allowed said situation to occur watching someone grow and letting them slip through the cracks. Popular vote is a problem, being larger in number does not equal having more morality or more expertise and matters regarding basic needs, needs to be handled more delicately than this and I wouldn't give it to properly especially never involve currency rules in actual life and death potential call power under workers thumbs. I think it's too silly, it has to fall in the realm barbarism. This is not thought out enough.

And you know what, resource based such circumstances would hardly effect anything given that production is up and demand is down, we make things faster than we use them. So why are there homeless people? So somewhere some housing scarcity is manufactured and there's a deeper truth to way people conduct themselves and modern capitalism at least gives them something meaningless to hide behind.

Just now, Sensei said:

Leonardo DiCaprio is much more. He is my climate change ambassador:

https://www.climatechangenews.com/2014/09/17/leonardo-dicaprio-appointed-un-climate-ambassador/

Actor just play a role..

 

22 minutes ago, Sensei said:

 

 

... in that statement you are right ... most people only think of money, how to get it, etc etc. etc.

Leonardo DiCaprio is hands down the greatest actor IMHO.

Anyway I could on about the mismanagement of resources, disparity, poverty, all because of how idiotic the ancient form of barter has been defiled into.

The only thing being done about the atrocities of the obsolete Ancient Lydian construct s the Venus test city expected to be built in Arizona and I am literally watching at a snail's pace the percentages on this page:

https://www.thevenusproject.com/center-for-resource-management/ Click 6. Our Progress To Date and Next Steps - go down to build infrastructure >show details>

"

Rise like molasses.

1 hour ago, iNow said:

Debt is an extremely powerful tool, but like all tools it must be wielded intelligently and with a clear understanding of risks. 

The entrepreneur who scales her manufacturing to meet the demand when it hits, but does so through a loan. 

The parent who lives rurally, but acquires s better paying job in the city in order to send their children to a better school and achieve a better future for them, but who can only do so by taking out a loan on a car. 

The person who takes a mortgage on a house to live in an area with more benefits and better schools, and who with each payment on that mortgage contributes to their own future equity. 

Or the craftsman who borrows to buy materials to build a product they can sell at 4-10x the input costs, or the street food vendor who borrows for her ingredients or the plates to serve her customers upon... customers who help her earn several multiples of what she initially went into debt to acquire.

Like any tool, debt used wisely is a powerful path to escape poverty and build a better tomorrow. Microlending programs across the planet demonstrate the validity of this point every single day and they have for decades. Also just like any tool, debt in the hands of those who use it ignorantly or with abandon is a risk that comes with real and fairly predictable long-term consequences. 

Unfortunately, idontcare, the only tool here seems to be you, with your sweeping generalizations and desire to preach instead of discuss. It’s okay that you’re not a fan of debt, but you’re failing miserably to recruit others to your perspective.

I’m sympathetic to your core point about the risks of debt and how so many millions (even billions) on our planet are harmed by it... and how many are everyday harmed by cronies who wield the power of debt and credit like a weapon upon the masses... but unfortunately you squander that sympathy and evaporate my patience with your continued soap boxing and closed mindedness. It seems you’d rather scream into an abyss and rake muck than to partner with others to explore potential solutions or improvements... and AFAIC you may just as well toss yourself straight into that endless void and never come out if you choose to persist in displaying this lack of interest in being better or trying harder to be a rational and reasonable discussion participant. 

You're twisting things justify a catastrophe that has grown out of control this is how debt can be used

3 hours ago, MigL said:

Soooo ...
You want to discuss a bad movie ?

No, here the Lydians invented currency, it started getting nefariously used in Ancient Rome, now it's become a technical setback

39 minutes ago, MigL said:

Don't have to.
Conservation laws and Thermodynamics do it for me.
( and I got my 'training' in school; not YouTube videos )

You still aren't mauling over any specific details you can throw a term at me all you want but if you can't apply them to address specific details it's pointless. 

30 minutes ago, MigL said:

Most people put up with the status quo because they have a lifetime of work invested in 'business as usual'.
Most anarchists have nothing to lose.

So why should the anarchist play monopoly? Force is the current answer. That's no good.