anaccountnow

A large part of the population in Europe is the gypsy minority. They are dreg. They cannot be described as people. It has nothing to do with biological assumptions or race. It is true that they cannot all be thrown into one bag. This is not important because rats are not all the same. In business you also have to make certain decisions and be uncompromising. Why do you eat pigs and cows but refuse to eat dogs? My neighbors would rather have pigs at home than a gypsy. It has nothing to do with race. Every day, Europeans complain about the economy, and the problem can be solved easily. Europe would look like Dubai if everyone opened their eyes and stopped playing morale to feel like they were well raised. Everybody here hates gypsies. Not all but what? Who will stand up for them? How will it affect you? Yet, we cannot all be hypocritical and call this idea unethical or immoral. Why is it moral to slaughter rats but not enslave (hyperbole) the poor who does not have their own state, murders, steals, hates, stinks and still complains about discrimination and they still provide social benefits for this dreg. I am against implementation of this system. In Europe, countries are poor because of the lack of mineral resources, other wealth and other causes. Some states, although they are not rich in mineral resources, have a lot of gypsies. If we sold these rats, Europe would be Dubai. However, it seems to me to be a logical and possible solution to get rid of this gypsies. If the rest of the world disagrees, they can accept these gypsies and have them deported to their countries. How else would they be deported? No one can get them out of here. This is not racism. It's purely a hypothetical question. :))

Why did some humans develop this?

I don't want to be childish. I ask because I wonder if it is purely a luck thing or there are other influences. I wonder what twins that grow up separately in other environments and families look like.

23 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

What makes you (given the context ) think this makes any more sense than the OP? 

23 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

What makes you (given the context ) think this makes any more sense than the OP? 

You're annoying me. I don't want to offend anyone right away but you're pissing me off. Ever since I signed up here, I've come across you up  everywhere I was. You put embarrassing emojis here and you act like you're the smartest man on Earth. I guess you have nothing to do. You don't have a job. You sit at home and write on this forum. Americans were against illegal migration to the US. Trump had the same view and that is one of the reasons why he was elected president. A big problem has been solved and it is time to solve the next one and focus on it. Invest more time and money. Any candidate who wants to win the next election will have to come up with an argument. People want better health the same way they wanted  more work and less migrants in their country. That doesn't make sense to you?      You're an idiot and I'm out of this forum! I won't read again.

6 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

I will be glad too, but you first, the OP makes little sense; why else would I compose three replies, before I click "Submit Reply"?

What doesn't make sense to you? LOL. You say he's not interested in the health of others. It doesn't matter that much. However, if he wants to secure another election in the next elections, it would be ideal to set certain criteria for him.

7 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

I've started three replies to this (four now), but I can't get past this, what makes you think Trump has any interest in the health of others?

He's alright, Jack...

The only thing he has invested in this, is his need to get revenge on Obama; phuq everyone else... 

I do not think so. I never said that. I will be glad if you read carefully before answering. That he does not care, I took into consideration before I started this discussion.

Sorry for my English. I can imagine much more progress. I think medicine is being neglected. Taking into account what radical changes were made during Donald Trump's function, more pressure is needed.

I myself do not like that man. He is perfect and ideal to be charged. Last week I heard on television how they said that a woman was released after 23 years in prison because the judges and jurors were wrong and the witnesses were just... It is easy to believe that Weinstein committed those crimes, but at the same time I would not be surprised if those women invented it because they just did not like him for various reasons. Can you think of any changes that would help improve..?

49 minutes ago, iNow said:

You made the claim. Onus is yours to support it. I’m not the one who asserted not a single human on the planet didn’t know. 

I know you’ll just continue to waffle, though. I know you’re not only unwilling to support your posts, but you’re also incapable. 

how did you support that its not obvious to everybody in this discussion that thievery and vandalism is just in lower rate? you didn't. as we say in the country where I live 

Those, who are preaching water, but drinking wine

13 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

Way to prove him wrong... 

BTW your manners are appalling, lock yourself in a cupboard and think about LMAO. what did I do?

Prove me wrong? really? So are you saying that it isn't obvious to everyone that vandalism and thievery is just in lower rate. you believe what you want to believe because its easy for you. You"re too subjective. 

to support my assertion that vandalism and thievery is in lower rate because Singapore's law system is more effective and more strict? If you need a link for that then I don't think we can debate. My English isn't perfect because its my 4th language. But if you re not educated enough to know that its a fact and need a link for sth like that then we wont debate. It wasn't because I wasn't capable of giving you a link but because its unacceptable. I will NOT look for a link to support sth that is very OBVIOUS. and by everyone I mean everyone in this discussion. LOL.

28 minutes ago, iNow said:

You made the claim. Onus is yours to support it. I’m not the one who asserted not a single human on the planet didn’t know. 

I know you’ll just continue to waffle, though. I know you’re not only unwilling to support your posts, but you’re also incapable. 

 I didn't assert not a single human on the planet didn't know.  You’ll just continue to waffle, though. I know you’re not only unwilling to support your posts, but you’re also incapable. 

11 minutes ago, zapatos said:

"The law" dictates manners?!?! Please, just stop. 

Really?  You think you cant sue people for verbal assault?

its in the law. Maybe I used the wrong words? That is also possible. English is my 4th language.

16 minutes ago, zapatos said:

Well that was rather vulgar. Off with his head!

its not prohibited. yet. you genius. English is my 4th language FYI. If you don't think before you write, I will not discuss with you. You have to check the facts first. I think I will ignore you. LMAO.

8 minutes ago, iNow said:

No, they don’t. Disagree? Evidence is your friend. 

Who doesn't know? Specifically.

4 minutes ago, J.C.MacSwell said:

Stating something more accurately makes him a smartass?

He thought I didn't know. Everybody knows that its just lower rate.

12 minutes ago, iNow said:

Actually, you can. It’s just at a lower rate than in some other locations.

Don't think I don't know. Stop being a smartass. Its not meant literally. 

For example. I think that is too extreme.

20 minutes ago, J.C.MacSwell said:

So reduce the risk of thievery and vandalism by instituting caning?

You cant observe thievery or vandalism in countries like Singapore because the law there is more strict.  I say it is VERY POSSIBLE.

8 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

You don't seem to understand people, at all...

I don't seem but I do. People are selfish beings. I understand people very well actually. Its not impossible to change them. Look at Singapore.

1 minute ago, John Cuthber said:

On the whole, in those circumstances I try to work out why they are being dicks.
It's often because they have been misled.

 

"Should I leave because I think the law should punish "minor things" worse? They already punish it but its not effective. "
So, you think we should do more of the ineffective thing...
OK...?

Do you see why others might not  feel that's going to help as much as tackling the actual cause?

Look at Singapore. Singapore doesn't have thieves etc. Its not ineffective at all

8 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

Who Dictates what manners are?

OMG  The law.

5 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

Then you don't understand what tolerance means.

 

Stop talking and start listening. Hate spreads hate. Don't tell me that. I NEVER said its not ok to hate. You can hate but you have to have manners. Understand that!

16 hours ago, Sensei said:

People who are not tolerant to minorities, to people of different races, LGBT, immigrants, etc. etc. learned it from somebody i.e. parents, teachers, populistic politicians and so on. Do you want to put them in jail as well? These is simply too many of them to put them all to jail (and for how long?)

You're basically saying about making re-education camps which are part of totalitarian countries.

Payback for what? For thinking? Openly expressing their stupid and ignorant believes and revealing their true face.. ? Shutting them up, won't fix their way of thinking. Such person will still "be sick" having to visit e.g. "immigrant doctor from middle east or southern Asia country" (UK example).. 

its ok to think but you still have  to respect the law. the law has to be more strict. things like vulgar vocabulary should get a more serious punishment.

5 minutes ago, John Cuthber said:

Then, to be consistent, because this site is tolerant, you should leave.

 

If you don't mind when some ignorant guy insults you in the street then ok. But there are people who don't like this. 

Should I leave because I think the law should punish "minor things" worse? They already punish it but its not effective. 

Don't talk about consistency. Stop trying to be a smartass. Im sure you don't like brash mouths or people who break the law. If you don't mind it that's fine. There are people who mind it and they are complaining. I want a better world.

8 minutes ago, anaccountnow said:

its ok to think but you still have  to respect the law. the law has to be more strict. things like vulgar vocabulary should get a more serious punishment.

If you don't mind when some ignorant guy insults you in the street then ok. But there are people who don't like this. 

Should I leave because I think the law should punish "minor things" worse? They already punish it but its not effective. 

Don't talk about consistency. Stop trying to be a smartass. Im sure you don't like brash mouths or people who break the law. If you don't mind it that's fine. There are people who mind it and they are complaining. I want a better world.



There are not so many people who aren't able to not break the law. They can have an opinion but they have to have manners.

3 hours ago, dimreepr said:

 

Tolerance is worse. 

16 hours ago, Curious layman said:

Payback for what? Not thinking like you. pretty sure this would encourage home grown terrorism. Fighting the man so to speak. Might give us some good music though.

And prison systems are hugely expensive, and despite them (prisoners) being isolated from us history has shown that we're not isolated from them- The Aryan Brotherhood being a good example.

I say that the law should be more strict. 

it doesn't have to be prison.

1 minute ago, dimreepr said:

That's my point. 

You don't understand it. As long as these people don't get a serious punishment then the world will still be infected. They want justice. 

Just now, dimreepr said:

An eye for an will blind the world; a smile for a smile will brighten the world.  

And the world is infected already. Its because we haven't achieved justice.

16 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

Why payback? Why not pay it forward?

 

OMG. You just answered your own question. If someone smiles at you, you smile back. If someone harms you harm back.

On ‎6‎/‎25‎/‎2019 at 4:58 PM, dimreepr said:

Because that's why people don't respect those that do...

you got it all wrong. The objective isn't to achieve respect but to payback. that is what I meant. It doesn't matter if they don't respect us when they are behind bars and isolated from the outside.

27 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

Stop talking and start listening.  I'm not Martian.

OK. I'm listening. You're right. Its totally the same when a person is imprisoned because he is discriminated because of his origin. That's not different. LMAO.

OMG. Mandela didn't respect them because they were racists. It wasn't due to their origin. If the people were white and not racists and he still didn't respect that would be different and he should stay in prison. It's very easy. Genius.

And it will not be important when the person is imprisoned. That's why we should imprison them. Its not important if they don't respect those wh....