ALine

My mistake, was attempting to describe surface area or the outshell of the massive object. If this is still incorrect please correct me.

I don't know and I can never say that I will ever know. But I want to know so it gives me something to wake up to in the mourning. A purpose or meaning. Like trying to find the end of the rainbow. I think that I am questioning too much of the reasoning behind science without even doing science. Personal side note - I think the magic at the end of the rainbow is from collecting pieces of gold on your way down and up. And once you reach the end you realize that the magic was in the journey all along and now you can go back and look at the beauty of what you have done in order to make something new and unique like exploring the universe in order to make a new one.

When it comes to physics I do not nor will I ever claim to be an expert. Only a curious explorer of knowledge for the application of developing ideas. My question, as stated in the title, is are we observing down too far. Meaning that why are we attempting to go smaller or bigger scale wise when it comes to understanding physics? By this I mean why are we, by we I mean science in general, trying to find an ultimate answer or a theory of everything? Why try and put puzzle pieces that do not fit together , together? I feel as if I already "know" the answer, however I feel as if I do not "understand" the answer.

I believe that mass can be classified by two parts, the space a system takes up along with the actual physical system in which takes up space. The former may be classified as volume and the later be classified as the observation of that volume. If you are attempting to observe the smallest mass then this may create a certain paradox or level of uncertainty due to whether or not the observer is affecting that mass due to said observation of that mass. Maybe even the usage of time begins to break down due to time itself being a for, of observation. Therefore in order to begin to classify if there is such a thing as an "absolute mass" one may first need to choose the correct observer medium which in turn is constant inside of all space. My first thought would be using the space of light, however, I am a novice when it comes to physics so I am unsure. Please message me with a response of what you think so that I can correct myself for issues in my understanding of physics.

I apologize for my recent behavior. I do not understand what I am asking in direct relation to the amount of knowledge that I have accumulated along with the amount of knowledge that others have accumulated themselves. I need to go back and learn exactly what it is that I am trying to say.

I apologize for my recent behavior. I did not understand what I was asking in direct relation to the amount of knowledge that I have accumulated along with the amount of knowledge that others have accumulated themselves. I need to go back and learn exactly what it is that I am trying to say. I will come back when I fully understand what exactly it is that I am trying to ask.

I apologize for my recent behavior. I did not understand what I was asking in direct relation to the amount of knowledge that I have accumulated along with the amount of knowledge that others have accumulated themselves. I need to go back and learn exactly what it is that I am trying to say.

ah, ok then. Maybe it is just the excitement from being able to trust the information that my professors have been attempting to give me all of these years along with the fact that there is just so much that I do not know and wish to learn. Thank you for telling me this and helping prevent me from getting of track from truly understanding reality and the external world around me. I will focus on my studies so that I can obtain a better depth of understanding so that I may better my chosen field of research.

I don't know, I just wanted to know I guess.

why has hide and go seek been around for so long?

oh, sorry looking back at it I miss phrased that. What I ment to say was are you supposed to feel something when you see a word. Like a happy feeling of knowing that something is there? like a "knowing" feeling if that makes any sense

do words have feelings attached to them?

wait what are you talking about the box variable or the non-box variable? Like the thing inside the box variable?

is time, from the field of physics, a nonlinear depth of memory, from the field of psychology?

title

do we take notes to just take notes or do we take notes to use those notes to better help clarify our understanding of the literal world around us?

oh my god thank you. Now that I actually think about it I do not know any of this and have only been memorizing things for sooooooo long. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/feels-good I wanna spread the knowledge everywhere. pure knowledge is pure ecstasy, metaphorically...ahhhh

so would variables themselves be dimensions such as if I am defining a car then can I define that as being a "car" dimension? And then can I use that car dimension as being part of a graph?

Man, I went to sleep today and was like, "Oh my god, it feels amazing that I know that I feel amazing and I know that I know that I feel amazing" However there is this weird smell in the air for some reason. I cannot explain it. Like roses or something. Kind of like the ocean actually like a weird mixture in between both roses and the ocean. never mind that, I am going to go learn more about some neural networks real quick. I will be riiiight back.

oh my god, I just learned about the beauty of science and the pursuit of knowledge! It feels sooooo good This is affecting my entire thought process, I cannot type this out fast enough. I have so many questions now! but it's hard because my ignorance keeps trying to pop its way back up!

do neural networks make sensory more and more abstract and then gives a defined output from that abstraction?

now question, is there a scale in which observation changes? Like from little observation to a lot of observation? Like a zooming in or focusing.

what if the human memory is the observation of previous sensory inputs?