Status Updates posted by mistermack
On my recent thread on conspiracies, it was posted in the politics section, and it was about politics. As I said in the intro, SOME conspiracies are true, eg, Bay of Pigs, Watergate, plots to kill Castro, etc. All accepted history, fully documented and undisputed. A full list would be huge.
So why is this SUBJECT treated as rubbish, when some of it is verified history? Some are rubbish, some are not.
Today we have a journalist murdered in the Saudi Embassy being discussed on the news. Is it rubbish because it implies a conspiracy?
- Show previous comments 4 more
It's put up to be shot down or debated or added to. My post was meant to inform people of new evidence and developments, and invite other views. A lot of people are not aware that the last official investigation concluded a probable conspiracy, or a second shooter.
re 2. The thread was closed, so I couldn't discuss it in the forum.
I'm not whinging about a closed thread, I just think it's missing a chunk of history to exclude a whole class of discussion, but I can see the slippery slope downside too, as stringjunky pointed out.