etcetcetc00

Thank you swansont. I didn't start this thread to argue over the size of the universe with someone who understands nothing about physics. Space is not infinite. It started as one point and is expanding at a constant rate. By definition then it cannot be infinite. Hopefully I can now get some responses that address the question I originally posted within the parameters I specified by people who understand the material.

Please stop. You don't understand what you're talking about. I want someone with an understanding of these concepts to address my question. If you re-post, I will ignore you.

The Boundary of the Universe = The c*The amount of time passed since the Big Bang (Or Big Clap). WMAP Satelite imagery has allowed cosmologists to determine not only the volume and rate of expansion of the universe, but also the time and place of its origin. I didn't make this up, and you're very wrong. please allow anyone with a better understanding of modern physics to address my idea.

Go read a book on M Theory, then read a book on the Multiple Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Physics, then think about it, then get back to me if you still feel like it. The idea of our universe being an infinite amount of space is out-dated. That remains true even if my hypothetical situation isn't true.

Duration - The Universe is not an infinite volume of space. It expands and has always expanded through time. Cosmologists have even discovered that space is expanding faster than the speed of light due to its interaction with Dark Energy. Space and Time were created with the universe, and develop with it (You've seriously never been told how the Universe is expanding?). There are at least two universes assuming the axioms I introduced in my first post. Please don't respond to an idea based on conditions if you don't understand the conditions. This is a hypothetical question. In other words, If I asked you if you would rather live in Prague or Copenhagen, but you don't know where those places are, don't answer the question.

This is a different universe. This is based on specifically M Theory and brane collision as the origin of the universe, but also applies to any other theory of the possible creation of another universe. I know the term "Universe" implies everything, but it was coined before the idea that other universes could be formed. Hence, the misnomers of "Alternate Universes" or "Multiverse" were created. Even "Black Hole" is an inaccurate name because it has been discovered that they emit radiation since the object was named. I'm not here to discuss linguistics. Because it was formed in the same way, and developed in one of the possible variants our world has proven to be (If MWI is correct), this "Alternate Universe" has the exact same volume with the exact same arrangement of matter that exists today in our universe. If your not even considering Multi-Dimensional Hyperspace, or the idea that another universe could be created in the same manner as ours, you're not addressing my question.

The volume of the environment is the volume of today's universe. This is based on the idea that this universe exercises all possible outcomes based on the Multiple Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. If another universes is created (assuming M Theory is correct, then if another Brane Collision occurs), and everything that happened in our universal history happens again because it is one of the possible Multiple Worlds (Our current existence being a precedent for this possibility), how is the me that exists as I do today down to the very last skin cell, that produces the same electrical impulses that my brain does, that is reproduced in the exact same process I was produced not also support my consciousness?

Duration - I'm not asking if two different points can share the same environment. I'm asking if two environments can share the same point. Quantum Physics seems to suggest it can in the case of photons. I just want to know what the difference is between the electrical energy in my brain and in one that is the exact same.

Science says (and correct me if I'm wrong) that my consciousness is a product of the electrical impulses in my brain. I'm not talking about a clone or twin, but an exact replica that is a product of the exact same history of the universe I am a product of. Theoretically, this would be a product of the same sperm and ovum that I am. It develops the exact same cells in the exact same arrangement with the same chromosomes and DNA code. Would it not then produce the same electric impulses that make my consciousness? I understand this is not testable, but I want to understand how this theoretical entity is or is not me.

I am not a professional physicist, and I do not understand physics as well as most of you would, and I understand this is a very conditional idea. My question is: - If the Multiple Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is true, and - M theory or any other theory involving creations of other universes is true I am a possible outcome of the universe we live in, and have been realized here. Is it possible that I might also be a possible outcome of another universe, and therefore am, will be, or have been realized in another universe as well? This may be too far into the realm of pseudoscience or metaphysics. I'm not asking if it has been proven, only if it is possible based on those prior conditions.