Jump to content

fredreload

Senior Members
  • Posts

    1123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fredreload

  1. 1 hour ago, studiot said:

     

     

    Think about it before you post such rubbish.

     

    cylinder-wood.jpg.ab5164d98bb218256946b1886dfb402b.jpg

    A wave has maxima and minima.

    This picture has neither.

    A wave can go in a straight line, or it can go like the picture below, creating a loop. I am saying the path the wave can take, not the structure of the wave.

    192753366_.thumb.png.e9bfacc519de893c82dd7dbd163c103c.png

  2. 5 hours ago, swansont said:

    Why would the shape matter? You can shine a light, or otherwise send an EM wave through the region, but creating a wave with that shape is another matter.

    Why would the EM wave cause a current to flow? 

    To induce a current you need a changing magnetic field inside the loop.

    Ya, I thought about it too, it is hard to create an EM wave of that shape, as well as whether this current generated could be of use in an application.

    The EM wave contains a magnetic field and an electric field, I am assuming the electric field propagate the magnetic field.
    Electromagneticwave3D.gif

    "Electromagnetic waves can be imagined as a self-propagating transverse oscillating wave of electric and magnetic fields. This 3D animation shows a plane linearly polarized wave propagating from left to right. The electric and magnetic fields in such a wave are in-phase with each other, reaching minima and maxima together."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation

    A cylinder shape em wave should generate a current based on the curl right hand rule.

    right-hand rule - Students | Britannica Kids | Homework Help

  3. So I took a look at this video(posted below) regarding magnetic field and I think if I create an em wave similar to the coil(4:33), I should get a current in return? Thing is no one have generated a coil like em wave before, sort of like a tidal wave, somewhere in the microwave to infrared spectrum.

    P.S. To control the current's direction, coil the magnetic field inward or outward.

  4. 14 minutes ago, swansont said:

    You went from “would they flow?” to “they will flow”

    Pick one. If it’s the latter, you need to explain why.

    An electromagnetic wave encompass both an electric field and a magnetic field. Thereby pushing the electrons along the way. Also has to worry about wavelength because if it is too small it might not work.

  5. 12 minutes ago, zapatos said:

    What electrons? Free electrons in the air between the source and the target?

    Yes, electrons created from air plasma that would flow along the laser's path.

  6. On 5/18/2021 at 2:46 AM, Ghideon said:

    As far as I know a laser is a device that emits light.

    Maybe you are looking for electron emitter such as those used in cathode ray tubes?

    Hmm, does the laser causes the electrons to flow along the light since it is an electromagnetic wave?

  7. 1 hour ago, swansont said:

    They don’t emit electrons. The laser light is emitted by electrons that are being accelerated.

    Thanks for the correction = =, I think I misread the Wikipedia description. Hmm, is there a laser that emits electron like an electron microscope? And is there any application for it?

    1 hour ago, Ghideon said:

    A free electron laser employs electrons as a gain medium. Photons are emitted, not electrons.

    edit: x-post

    I see, good call.

  8. 2 hours ago, swansont said:

    You say electron laser as if you need an electron laser to do this.

    Or are you thinking that an "electron laser" emits electrons?

    Ya I was thinking of free electron laser which emit electron in the form of a current. But any type of powerful laser such as infrared could ionize air and produce plasma in mid air when focused on a spot. I am assuming air ionization means using photon to knock out an electron in air.

     

  9. 8 hours ago, swansont said:

    To be clear, there is such a thing as a free electron laser, but yes, the way fredreload used it was meaningless. (and a free electron laser is one that’s potentially capable of ionizing air along its path)

    The electron flows from high potential to low potential, so if I create a path with electron laser with medium potential, it would carry some resistance.

  10. 25 minutes ago, Klaynos said:

    A laser is not, and cannot be a conductor.

    "electron laser" is meaningless. 

    This is also meaningless. Why are you putting random words together. 

    You could change the material of the resistor by replacing one atom at a time. In this case creating an air path with laser with the same resistance and slowly replacing the resistor. You could also shave or transform the material, that would be out of my scope. The voltage would drop a bit but it is the same entity.

  11. This is harder than I thought = =, because the material is not carried along. If I conduct a circuit on a gold wire, how do I move the voltage exhibited on a resistor?

    P.S. Alright I get it, you duplicate the resistor's resistance on the air path.

  12. 3 hours ago, swansont said:

    Maybe you could learn some physics instead of relying on assumptions.

    Ya I know, a lot of guess work there lol. The electricity flows from a higher electrical potential to a lower one. That means I need to make the laser path a conductor to discharge the electricity.

    P.S. Might need an electron laser if I do not want to ionize the air path.

  13. 7 minutes ago, swansont said:

    Your chart says nothing about "excess in voltage not dissipated as power"

    "The gain for the voltage across the capacitor and inductor combined in series shows antiresonance, with gain going to zero at the natural frequency."

    This, I'd assume the anti-resonance effect gets canceled out by the inductor and irradiated as the magnetic field, or perhaps you could explain this anti-resonance phenomenon?

    P.S. No, I am assuming the voltage would get dissipated as heat cuz of the conservation of energy.

  14. I know I will get bombarded by tons of people, get yelled at, and get defamed, but please note that I post this based on my speculation with good faith.

    To begin with about consciousness, you will have to take note of a few things, the body is consisted of neurons and electrical signals, sure there are other things like muscle, but muscle cannot think for you. It goes down to neurons and electrical signals, you will ask yourself, does your consciousness exist in the neurons, or does it exist in the electrical signals? The answer is, since the electrical signal/current flows through our body, but the consciousness is only in the brain, not anywhere else. The electrical signal/current travels through the neurons in our butt and in our knees, but it is on the in the brain, so I rule out that the consciousness as a possibility of current.

    Now I took a look at the brain, and if consciousness is in the brain, which region is it? This is when I came across the striatum and the consciousness loop.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Striatum#/media/File:Basal_ganglia_circuits.svg

    So I took a look at striatum and thing maybe the consciousness arise from there, but the dopaminergic signal traveling from to it is only 8Hz, vs the 68Hz coming from the GABAergic signal from the substantia nigra to the thalamus. Clearly in human perception it must be close to 68 frames per second. So I ask, could the consciousness be arise from the thalamus? Could we be a magnetic field? To be honest I do not know if we can exist as a magnetic field entity.

    This is when I receive some hints that it might have to do with eletrical resonance, or any type of resonance for that matter, but since the brain is synonymous to a circuit, it has to be electrical resonance, or any type of phenomenon similar to that. This is where I compare it to an RLC circuit.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance#/media/File:Tuned_circuit_animation_3.gif

    This image, does it reminds you of anything? Yes it is the consciousness loop with thalamus being an inductor and the dopaminergic signal going into the striatum as a capacitor. And if you have an RLC circuit in the brain you would have a antiresonance/resonance in the voltage.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance#/media/File:RLC_Series_Circuit_Bode_Magnitude_Plot.svg

    This comes from the antiresonance of the RLC circuit, but to get a resonance in the voltage you will need a parallel RLC circuit. And what voltage could it generate? This is only 1rad, as I have mentioned we have 68Hz coming from the GABAergic signal of the substantia nigra. You plug in 68Hz and the voltage gain would spike at the resonance point.

    With this much said I conclude that consciousness is an electrical resonance phenomenon of the voltage from the parallel RLC circuit. I am not sure if the resonance voltage is dissipated as power.

    I am also not sure if the consciousness is a magnetic field dissipated from an indcutor, but I think we need to look at it as a whole RLC circuit.

  15. 29 minutes ago, Area54 said:

    If I aim a reply at a silly post, does the reply share the inconsequence of the post?

    Dunno, it shares the circuit but is in parallel(same voltage), it might have to be in series to be effective.

    1 hour ago, swansont said:

    That’s not a statement that has any basis in science. I am loath to touch it, knowing where it must have come from.

    Where do you think it comes from? I was referring to this chart.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance#/media/File:RLC_Series_Circuit_Bode_Magnitude_Plot.svg

    You'd think that the voltage is dissipated through the inductor's magnetic field, but something tells me that is not the case.

  16. 15 minutes ago, swansont said:

    How? Has this ever been observed?

    How is this like lightning?

    Because the laser redirect and ground the current, causing a discharge. I am not sure why voltage is consciousness, I am still working out the idea, give me some time.

    P.S. It seems to be an excess in voltage not dissipated as power

  17. 1 hour ago, exchemist said:

    Do you mean what distinguishes one person's consciousness from another person's? The fact that the two people are physically distinct. It's a bit like asking what makes one orange different from another one. 

    I see, they can have the same voltage level but being different entities. Like they both have 5 volts but are two different entities. Like if I am a voltage entity I would say I have 5 volts, the other person is also a voltage entity with 5 volts, but we are two distinct entities.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.