Jump to content


Senior Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

-19 Bad

About blue89

  • Rank
  • Birthday 06/13/1989

Recent Profile Visitors

5702 profile views
  1. anyway ... I am leaving permamently.. someones uses apparently insulting word "arrogant" cannot be acepted!!!!... I am closing this account via closing the mail. I hate impolite ones! anyway ... you are not speaking honestly. you have understood everything and you are complaining incoherence just remember that almost all of my queries have been answered by yourself (!)
  2. I think I am not such pinerous that hide my achievements in my comments there. but in my opinion ,surely you have no empathy to understand me. look : "I still have no money " but I also have no published academic materials at NPG (meanwhile I would write only at NPG)" because of these lacknesses ,I normally feel me hurt when someones say something like blaming me via such following sentence "You do not use scientific methods" I say when I took an acceptance you will be paralyzed both for your critiques which are relevant to language and science. I perfectly accept critiques. but do not repeat please the same critique and try to make more objectively and also meaningful. and as result ,we are not willing to write there our all scientific materials... but surely this cannot mean that we were pinerous nor use methods which are not scientific. We never accept insultive expressions. look what "uncultured " means for further help about our initial discussion relevant to that rude member. it is also quite surprising while you are willing to help someones,he/she insults you and cause somethings which reminiscents like "punishment" UNACCEPTABLE.... could someone speak more intimately please,what they would me to do? if they would me to leave there ok. that is not so much difficult. SOME PRINCIPLES please do not be concise at anything except scientific laws. please do use polite tongue please do not think that you are the best or better than anyone remember please ,all we are here
  3. because Turkish is very very sensitive language.my native language is kurdish. but again turkish people say that My turkish was very very elite. they are right at a point. this language requires very very careful and high balance and also ability. generally arabic , france and persian people cannot reach the elite version before 10 years. because this language does not accept some pronunciation versions and also conflict with these filologies. the offensive thing is just repeating this. also they do not believe anything which I say. but aren't they are ridiculous to use such a big words like "your english is not poor,worse than that.We are feeling us tired. I have been feeling me quite nervous and. although I may use "naughty boy "version ,I did not do this anytime. so they are offensive and also IMPOLITE (but more non-objective (the origin of problem). to be honest,there exists stronger scientific contexts,but I cannot understand the reason why someones are repeating the same thing ("your english is not good"). Generally I hate to see repeated actions. probably this would be another relevance with this thread. --- they limit their view of science --- the result of I saw about this issue.
  4. really I hope I will never be in such failings like you did about politeness. this and string's words are the worst expressions in turkish. probably you do not believe about my english & turkish & native language I have decided a thing. I will try to write my comments short and comonly with passive voices. I think these last allegations are insultive. We have warned many many times. the reasons (computer falings,caused by economic matters) the explanations relevant to moral (ethics) the intellectuality anyway. at last ,I would strongly remind that *** blue89 **** does not need anyone to learn academic knowledge. you are free. but I am missing the time with repeating this time to time so commonly. I am going to apply patent institutes and I am sure I am able to write great articles. you and that rude one do not know what I have written in my paper. it was not easy. it was containing strict formulas.and as it expressed. to think that any mathematician would be unable to do hard science is ridiculous. continue your insultings or failings.
  5. I think. why not ? (this means you did not enjoy my faults.) if it so,unfortunately it seems I should have a break. because at first my computer is spoilt and I cannot buy the suitable one now until reach some achievements. and secondly,I have a bit careless.as a third reason I hate to take notification from moderators (you are moderator). I will never be happy with taking warnings. This was almost the worst thing that I had met there. anyway,I should interrupt or decrease my comments there. I am almost sure if he was near me. I would achieve to entertain (or make him smile) him haha ,I have very very entertaining / funny /energetic / friendly personality. intelligent/positive Anyway. I am going to prepare the documents for application of patent. have you any statistics of ratio how amount of applicants are being successfull??
  6. indeed this is right.but phi for all,this is already one of my very nice and familiar spelling faults :-) haha ha :-) look you also have done the same fault very nice While I am smiling for such cases of another members' (faults) ,everyone would only criticize me. that is strange really.
  7. Well , I believe we may earn money via using our creativity. if we be able to provide a good samples of products which designed only by ourself. then we might earn much money by ourself. this is honest way to earn money. I believe I can do both of these things. but do not know how to persuade you :-) strange you are very flexible ,I love such ones but I feel me a bit surprising. I remember you had said that your age was almost equal to the position of my father or grandfather and in spite of this you are almost capable to compete with me in comparison to our energy :-) thats very very lovely. I appreciate it. I enjoyed it. I also disagree to this idea. because at a time I had seen a hodja at one university in istanbul. she had a PhD degree. her age was old. but she could not achieve writing an article. I understood that she also did not try to write. NPG? I believe this journal is strong and a bit intellectual (but intellectuality insufficient) nevertheless totally is the best. Someones cannot realise somethings these are different things 1) having PhD degree or higher such a title arising "professor" 2) having very very creative & social or sucessfull personality
  8. Dear Juno thanks very much for your comprehensive explanation. Really I am not complaining the economy for my private necessities. but I see it has been understood so. or they understand me that I expressed a demand of money there. this is both illogical and unethic. :-) okay. but could you guide me please. As it expressed I have no money. I only read articles whenever I have spare times. or related links (scientific). could you explain please, with which logic/meaningful idea I might talk a patent attorney while I already say I would not be able to pay him/her for his/her explanations/helps to me. However there exist very useful instructions I think that you might make you understand with these the reasons why make me possible to think so cool ---->> I have very very creative personality. so there already will be possible for many patent considerations. all of them would be different. ---->> I think I have cared to confidentiality enough. because more attention than this will already make someones feel strange. At a time When I expressed such things to ecancemedicalsciene journal's senior editor. she asked "why are you fearing so much to share it with me" I am not feeling me happy on this route if I make anyone feel sad or strange. and all discussions are for only one shared projects. (also,I did not shared main text elsewhere except nature photonics) Strange's advice seems the most meaningful to guide. Thank to strange. of course other scientists and candidates
  9. hi ,although that member insulted me at another forum many many times and continued there and also imatfaal warned him at this thread: http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/97918-nature-publishing-physics-project-outlines/page-6 ,he refutes it, among his comments at this thread: http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/100317-to-patent-and-some-extraordinary-approachesunfortunately-need-help/ I would inform that this rude member caused me to take warning point. I never used and I am not in the party of usage of these words (given below) across anyone ** idiot ** foolish ** stupid so it would be good to say that one moderator is not correct according to my ideas. thats why ,there exists some hazardous probabilities in Ethics and we consider such things may cause psychiatric matters later .some events might also be reported at psychiatric clinics. but the psychiatry these days already cannot solve everything and also some journals are apparently express indirectly their difficult situations like nature's translational psychiatry did. see please NPG's t-psychiatry journal's beginning sentence in attachment doc. how they begin their guideline.We give the emphasize to the mystery of psychiatric mattters and advise not to insult anyone. This might cause a real psychiatric matters for you if you insult anyone (especially if that one who hears insult is innocent. everyone always free whether he/she would believe me or not whenever he/she converse with me. but currently I d o n o t w a n t t o d e a l w i t h Dr.Krettin until he apologize to me. (he is very very rude ,I surely saw he used disgusting words at another platform and one evident given in that related links (above),I am complaining!) pssikiyatri.pdf
  10. I think you are just such ones who are using very very traditional ways to do science.look and see the relevance please (I generally use very very different approaches.) look; mike asks whether we are limiting our view of science via giving some instructions. (I also think given instructions are suffıicient to make at least short interpretations furthermore please do not miss that everything might have relevance at the top of science but I will provide clear relevance) look I believe somethings encourage and also give us potency to create new/novel approaches (like youth ,like beauty ,or like respect , like energy ,handsome appearance ..... at real we need novel approaches to reach different results.however ,that is quite clear that these are not the consistence of all ways how to reach novel approaches and so great results. in addition , only novelty is not sufficient really,it should be useful.
  11. 1) No. for instance in engineering this was very good step to create tuch technology. (touchpad, android etc.) these are bright. but surely big amount o scientists are unfortunately insufficient. 2) of course I respect your ideas and also with more attention. because I believe you provided me helpful instructions. So THANKS VERY MUCH Strange. ,YOUR LAST COMMENTS WERE QUITE HELPFUL many thanks... blue89
  12. Heyyy strange ,what about to make friendship with me on facebook. Please do not provide your age as a refugee's reason. I do not care nationality ,age ,gender and religion. ajb is not muslim. but he is quite honest and elegant in his words (very very polite). I think he is also hardworking. but really I could not make him persuade about an issue : he believes that how we work how we will be successfull. Responding.. A) okay I will apply to turkish patent institute. But are you sure at all probabilities about NDA? ,I have told almost entire of the first shape of document to studiot,but I trust him. he does not do such dishonest things. (to steal) furthermore, B)I will already use quite strict formulas,so I really do not predict that it would be possible to get stolen it with only sending abstract to any company.
  13. May I ask what "a operate patent" means? furthermore,could you confirm please once,I should make application for a patent,then should contact companies. (is it correct?)
  14. anyway ,I think I already explained every detail about the previous issue. Meanwhile,Thanks very much Strange. (I am feeling thankfull about your explanations) 1) not the theory of course. That is the duty of Journals already ,not the patent institutes'. I meant ---->> usages of theory : like this ,one theory might be used for 28 devices. but should we provide for only specific one? which of these better to do? 2) the equivalent query: assume please there exist several different methods,but not exactly making changes on the same methods ,this will be already different one. in this case which of thats should I prefer --->> to present only one method in one file? --->> to present all methods in one file? NOTATION: although my manuscript was too long which I submitted to Nature Photonics,I had written that it was "brief form" in manuscript. becauese really it would bee too longer if I would present all details (.and there were several methods)
  15. We implied your forum or that forum which you are Moderator or manager or akin to this. probably was this one : http://thescienceforum.org/ Remember you had used many many DISGUSTING words across to me. And although I cared your words ,you had continued at this forum ,too,as it expressed and proved above (imatfaal warned/notified you but you again continued). but the worst thing ,you caused me to take warning point as it appears on my profile. Apologise please. I do not think these friends to insist at such bad ways to tell anything. (the bad way is about ethic ,not linguistic or hard scientific) remember ,you also alleged that blue cannot try hardscience. probably you were unaware that I was mathematician. that is quite ridiculous to think/predict that any strong mathematcian might not do the hard science if you apologise,I am quite gentle and careful at ethical issues. so we may continue. But at first you HAVE TO APOLOGISE. otherwise ,be informed please anyone who seriesly think that he has had ability to learn independently will not need your words and you. My friends are enough. I am delighted them. Strange(****) ,Klaynos ,ajb , studiot (****),Koti , imatfaal (****) ,swansont..etc. (****) : I believe these are strong...swansont is good friend but you caused me to take a warning point from him. Bravo Krettin! if you would like to converse with me,you have to apologise .... blue89
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.