Jump to content

Hans de Vries

Senior Members
  • Posts

    325
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hans de Vries

  1. On 11/18/2021 at 7:53 PM, CharonY said:

    There are some newer studies out there, but fundamentally the strongest link is seen in cases of severe deficiencies where impulse aggression seems to be elevated. Outside of extremes the evidence points to perhaps a slight inverse relationship, but it is certainly not a simple quantitative correlation.

    That, btw. is a common finding in human subjects. For complex traits there is rarely a simple quantitative relationship between a given trait/behaviour/psychological state and a given marker. In some cases changes are more indicative (e.g. increase or decrease of certain hormones as opposed to their absolute values) but almost always the situation is complex. It is likely also for many animals, but we lack the ability to define nuances that we can do with humans, as we can simply talk to folks.

    Are there alternate neurobiological hypotheses of anger?

  2. On 10/10/2021 at 2:14 AM, CharonY said:

    Well, if you are wondering about that, perhaps you need to figure out what neurodivergence means in a given context. Is there for example a classification system? A second thing to look into is whether any of the trait scores correlate with that measure. 

    Neurodivergence is the state when someone's brain functions in a way that is in one or more ways, significantly different than typical.

    Normally it is used to describe individuals with Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia and a few other disorders - but when you take just the definition it could apply to other things as well.

    Does a brain with someone who is in 10th highest percentile in both Extraversion and Agreeableness significantly different from average? IMO it is

  3. What do you think about the ideas of Jordan Peterson? More precisely the idea that history of human society is that of dialogue between conservatives and liberals and that if conservatives and liberals can agree on something, then it's likely a good thing to do. In other words too much conservatism is bad and too much liberalism is also bad

  4. On 9/18/2021 at 4:13 PM, Peterkin said:

    There's lots in Alaska. I think, as far as water is liquid - it's a really hardy plant.

    Poor. I had some in a small pond, years ago. As the pond dried up, the bullrushes retreated. By the third year, they had all died out. It more commonly propagates through rhizomes, so you could dig some up from a roadside ditch to have a stand of them sooner. But they do need mud.

    Do you know whether cattails react well to organic fertilizer like dung or compost?

  5. 5 minutes ago, Peterkin said:

    Of course it should be. But, there is a catch: only the people who can already do the math understand what that would cost and how it might be funded - and only a small fraction of those people are willing to make the necessary adjustments and contributions or to extend their access to knowledge to their less fortunate compatriots. In order to bring about such a change, the general public would need to know what the privileged know and won't share. Meanwhile, forces among the privileged oppose any reform with might, fury and unlimited financial backing. As things stand politically, it can't be done, any more than universal public health insurance could be done. The opposition is overwhelming. 

    One stopgap measure that could perhaps be implemented, is far more government support for public broadcast media, civics course and educational outlets in all geographic regions. (Not that they're likely to be heard over the Sinclair Group.... but it's worth a try.)

    Is taxing the rich an option?

  6. Some people have naturally very low reward sensitivity and are less motivated by reward or punishment

    In case of neurotic disorders the goal is to strengthen activity in the Prefrontal Cortex and hippocampal neurogenesis with things such as ketamine, allopregnanolone or regular SSRIs even.

    How do we do the same with reward system?

  7. MBTI is not scientific, it was created by two women with no experience in psychometrics. Big 5 and HEXACO are created by professional psychologists and have been in use for several decades now but MBTI is much more used by businesses and is more popular.

     

     

  8. 7 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

    Any test that's limited to only 5 aspects of an infinate range, is more likely to exclude than include; it's almost like it was designed that way.

    Humans do not have 100s or 1000s of personality traits. You may create a test with 100 traits but all or most of them will be variations of those 5.

    There is stuff that is not covered by the Big Five but could be added - Systemizing Quotient, Theory of Mind Quotient (i.e. cognitive empathy) and a few things

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.