Jump to content

Tzurain

Senior Members
  • Posts

    63
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tzurain

  1. Let's see. Strong halogen lamp and a prominent shade. Air will be cooler underneath the shade, warmer air rises up, tadaa airflow. No chi, just basic physics, although those basics are also a kind of magic for some people.

    B-b-but I tried the experiment in my house o~o

     

    Yes, I have a light at the top, emitting heat from the light bulb, and a a shade at the bottom. But it's not like the video! It's like a normal house light, and a normal shade. (Inb4 define normal)

     

    It's just like the setting, but I think the 'physics force' was not enough to make the paper spinning like what I did.

  2.  

    So, next you have to eliminate thermal effect, vibration, static electricity, ...

     

    There are a great many real effects that could case this before you can even consider invoking something that doesn't exist.

     

    Indeed, but as I have stated, this 'Chi' is a force that affects other forces. (Such as heat, sound and electricity)

     

    Electronkinesis, for example, may have correlations to Chi.

    Our bodies are capable of controlling electricity, by what we know as Biophotons.

     

    https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20131202163140AACoARn

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biophoton

     

    I have not gathered enough information about Chi, but in my opinion, it is a force that affects the movement of our cells and physical exterior.

     

  3. No, it's crap. Any effect you think you had will vanish if you do the experiments under controlled circumstances.

    That's a bold move to say. As we are both intellectual people, I can agree that the experiments I had made were mostly indeed, not under controlled circumstances.

     

    However, I am interested to here about "No, it's crap" part.

     

    Can you please give out following points and reason (If you can, with evaluation) so you can fortify your statement, and hopefully, try to disassemble my suggestion on Chi?

     

    :3

  4.  

    What did you do to eliminate the possibility of air movement, for example.

    Are there any witnesses to these feats?

    Did you do a controlled, blind study where the person observing the objects was not aware of what you were trying to do?

     

    I have placed an inverted transparent basin , with a paper balancing on a needle within it. The purpose to of the basin was to prevent any external force like air from the outside.

     

    The experiment which I made was similar to this video.

     

  5. I'm sorry to stray from your request, for what I have in mind is to disapprove the existence of Infinity and Random.

     

    In my perspective, everything is calculated, and had been placed in an order. What happens has happened, and what will happen, will happen. Denying the future is denying destiny, but we human beings, do not know much of what will happen. However, what we human Can do is accept events that have happened, which was once a possibility from the past.

    Here's an example. A ball drops from the table onto the ground. There is no denying this, the ball drops from the table to the ground. However, Before the ball dropped from the table to the ground, it was only a possibility.

    The question poses "Will the ball drop from the ground?"

    If the question was conspired before the ball from the ground, we can honestly say "We have no idea".
    But if the question was conspired AFTER the event, we can honestly say "Yes, the ball Will drop to the ground" Thus, the possibility of the initial question is now a certainty, and not of something that is random.

    "We have been given the theory of the right to brag vainly about
    both our "infinitely" expanding dream and our sketched future.
    The two hands of the clock point out the "finite" factor. " --- Anonymous quote

    We sometimes say knowledge and love is infinite. Never having a limit.

    In my perspective, it is just an exaggeration, as both the highest point of knowledge and love are ones that are not within our grasp.

    Imagine the peak of a mountain no one can reach. For some, the peak is infinity, as no matter how much you climb, you will never reach the top. However,

    the mountain has a definite height all the same, just too far for one to reach.

    The climb to the top of the mountain can be infinity, if the climber never stops, however I can assure you this, the climber will stop, at a moment in its time.
    (In real world situations, that is)

    These thoughts are indeed thought-provoking and fun, and I have been thoroughly amused from the topic. Thank you ^^

    (Maybe random may not exist, but I will use the term a lot anyway x3)
    (#Random)



    Ah, I only realized this was in the mathematical section, as I found this topic in the "Recent Topic" section. As for that, I assume you would prefer a mathematical formula or equation to be in accordance to the Theory of Infinity and Random.

    Due to that ,I sincerely apologize. x3

    But the concept you pose is also a scientific and a real-based one. After all, what is maths, but a concept, to help us understand reality better? :3

  6. Its a snowflake moray eel, Echidna nebulosa. Its a common aquarium species

    Indeed. This man right.

     

    As well as that, I believe I went to the same Aquarium as you in Malaysia. There's usually a list next to the tank, with a picture, and it should tell you a brief description of the animal, as well as it's species.

     

    :3

  7. Heyyo Everyone!

    The topic reviewed today will be about chi.

    Chi, known as a life force in a living being, can be theoretically used for healing activities, or even the manipulation of the ancient elements (Earth, Fire, Wood, Metal and Water).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi

     

    Many other texts from the past also have similar things with near description to Chi, such as Chakra and the Soul.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chakra

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul

    I've been thinking lately, but could the embodiment of emotions be related to Chi? And is Chi used to support our vital organs?

     

    For example, have you been into a state of depression? If you have, then you would notice and feel a painful clenching of the heart, as if it is hard for the heart to beat. Assuming Chi is Emotions, when you are depressed (Lack of emotions), the Chi level is low,

    thus, it results into having the heart being painful to beat. (Theoretically assuming that Chi is used to allow the heart to beat).

    I've also been delving into the manipulation of elements using Chi , searching from the internet and asking those in real life. Here are some videos, which are related to chi.

     

    (Someone making a fire using Chi)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bTzAN-G204

    (Psychokinesis, history channel, but I think he's using Chi to move the objects)

     

    But of course, not all things can be trusted from the Internet, so I tried to do some of this "Chi manipulation" myself.

     

    Surprisingly, after a bit of practice, I found myself to be able to move some objects slightly with certain gestures with my hand (Small objects though, like pencils, bottle caps and coins)

    I was also able to control candle light, by making it grow brighter when trying to 'channel' happy or angry thoughts into it, and dimmer when thinking more sadder and gloomy thoughts.

    However, there is a possible chance that I am gullible enough to believe that I had done the stated stuff above, where in actual reality, there is already a proven scientific force behind this.

    All in all, I hope you have gained some thoughts and fed your mind well from reading this topic.

    Tell me what you think.

    Is Chi real or is it false? And why?
    What exactly is Chi, to you?


    Thank you. ^^

    (Note: Sorry for all the unreliable sources, such as Wikipedia and Youtube)
    (P.S: However, I believe that those interested in the topic can find more sources for this if they try to look for one)

  8. I'm not entirely sure of the question asked, but I shall try answer it with my understanding of the question posed.

    The human ear can respond to minute pressure variations in the air if they are in the audible frequency range, roughly 20 Hz - 20 kHz

    As for the Tissues and Cartilage, they resonate vibrations, I suppose.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.