Hendrick Laursen

 

Dogs and Pigs are Considered Unclean..

 

QUESTION..

 

In The Quran, God Tells Noah to Save Two Of Every Kind Of Animal.. If God saw Dogs and Pigs as Unclean, Then Why Didnt God Drown Them in The Great Floods?

 

 

Quran 11:40

 

Hud

(Thus it was) till, when Our commandment came to pass and the oven gushed forth water, We said: Load therein two of every kind, a pair (the male and female), and thy household, save him against whom the word hath gone forth already, and those who believe. And but a few were they who believed with him.

RESEARCH IT...

The Quran would not have a foundation without the Old Testament.. The Story of Noah, States That God Asked To Save Two Of Every Animal..

If One Single Scripture Undermines Anything, Then The Whole Book Is Flawed.. People are very clever at editing out these facts.. Trying to prevent you from Asking these Questions..

 

The fact that "pigs" and "dogs" are unclean, DOES NOT EQUAL that they're doomed to die.

That's your point.

Invasive blood pressure monitoring, the way it is currently done in hospital, will never be suitable for home use if that is what you are after. Passing a catheter into an artery is full of risks, and even in hospital having an arterial line qualifies you for closer care.

 

Maybe a technology based on pulse oximetry could be extended to measure blood pressure, though if it was easy to do it would already have been done.

Agreed.

Rupture of arteries cause serious problems, and intra-arterial injection is not a very common medical procedure.

Trump will lead the US backwards.

That's all.

No

Okay well I totally lost the old one so I am in the process of making a new one you can see what it looks like here http://davidmather.github.io/

The p- groups (IIIA to VIIIA) seem to be out of place, a bit more right.

It could stump a real person.

Another one:

Me: Imagine there is a nation.

Bot: Imagines there's no countries.

ME: Can a nation be different from a country.

BOT: Because I was saying, that you might be the only real think in this universe. Since everything else, included me might been invented by your imagination.

ME: You already stumped yourself.

BOT: But I did.

An Strange talk...

PS: It seems the bot knows a poem by "Edgar Allan Poe" named "The Raven", because if you type two verses only, it'll go on.

I think, the theist approach to "God" is ignored in this discussion.

The concept of God is as old as Humanity itself.

The concept of God is as old as Humanity itself.

Certainly impossible.

The concept of "GOD" is absent in Buddhism. However, he is the "father" - as christians say - in Christianity.

He did but it doesn't mean he interferes in our daily deeds.

You mean the remaining "Ukraine" hates Russia? Crimea and Donetsk are so glad to enter the confederation.

People make wars and people die in wars. How is this related to God?

Though Jesus was a real person [i'm not to debate this now]

The oldest Gospel isn't Mark's, it is the oldest surviving one, which won't make it the oldest. It was written years after Jesus.

The gulf certainly has flooded at least once in ~ 6,000 years ago.

Studies in northern baghdad have resulted in finding some sedimentary layers of more than 7 metres in thickness.

Several theories followed,

one of the most reliable ones claim: "It's the Euphrates overflowing it's banks."

In Sumerobabylonian mythology, a guy named "Shemesh- n' pishtim" was saved during a flood with his family. [sumerian Noah] [referred to in Gil go mesh epic.]

Also, it's believe that Ark or Noah's Ship was settled on Ararat mountains [in Turkey] that Quran calls "Judii", and some ruins of it remain there with some hebrew names written on it.

For any further studies refer to Cambridge Ancient History, Vol I.

so many the ones i remember now maybe Jane Eyre,

Good Charlotte Bronte, How well those girls could write, I wish 21st century's girls could write like 'em too.

As hyper says, allotropes are probably what you mean. You could look 'em up in Wikipedia.(Sulfur has some funny Allotropes!)

mass of H₃? I don't think that's quite a stable molecule. It's collapse as fast as being generated.

Wiki says the range is ~0.7-2.5 fm. However 1 fm is the most powerful.

It's force depends on the nuclei involved, their distance and their number. This image will do it:

Force (in units of 10,000 N) between two nucleons that experience the nuclear force, as a function of distance. In the graph that falls below the horizontal axis, the spins of the particles (which must be different, such as a neutron and proton) are aligned, and they become bound with a negative "binding energy," which becomes maximal at a distance a little more than 1 fm at the minimum of the region shown. Particles much closer than this optimal distance experience a repulsive force. Particles farther than the distance of highest attractive force still experience a smaller attractive potential (Yukawa potential), but it falls at an exponential function of distance.

Courtesy of Wikimedia Foundation Inc, reproduced here regarding Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;

You have to search on Mendelev or Lutharmier(?)

unfortunately we Quranists differ a lot from other Muslims, we reject a lot of Islamic books and we accept only the Qur'an , in addition we understand Qur'an differently , the first fact (Jesus is only a human) is a traditional Islamic view for Jesus, the second one is a Qur'anist's view, in Qur'an Jesus is called the spirit of God, he was given the holy spirit , which was not given to any other human . one of the Quranists says" Jesus is greater than what Muslims think and less great than what Christians think"

Then certainly you're not a muslim.

A Muslim, follows both Quran & Ahl-Ul-Bayt as been said by prophet:

انی تارک فیکم الثقلین کتاب الله و عترتی اهل بیتی

ما ان تمسکتم بهما لن تضلوا ابدا

و انهما لن یفترقا حتی یردا علی الحوض

The "Unbeknownst" really amused me,

Come on, you're not John Milton!

harshgoel,

I really like your sentence:

"Everyday is the 'day of judgment'"

Why believing in "AFTER LIFE" is wiser than not believing.

Through the history they've come thousands of prophets, all of them being famous for being honest and truthful including Noah, Abraham, Moses, Joshua, Jesus Christus and Mohammad. And all of them have warned us on "Afterlife".

So, is it wiser to believe in afterlife or not?

1. Not to believe

If we die and nothing happens, then it's neutral. We neither win nor lose so 0

If we die and see there's an afterlife, then we lose (-1) because we haven't prepared ourselves for it.

So the addition on this condition is 0+(-1)=-1

2. To belive

If we die and nothing happens, then it's neutral. We neither lose nor win so 0.

If we die and find an afterlife, then we win(+1) because we have prepared ourselves for it.

So the addition on this condition is 0+1=1

Therefore, considering all of the probable conditions, we witness that believing in Afterlife is wiser than not believing.

I've heard they speak German in Switzerland, don't they?

Da! Citation needed?!

The last time I asked for citations here, I was told to go nuts!

Anyway, I dunno if there are some researches out in the net on the matter but I even won't trouble myself to surf the net to find something on the material 'cause it's my personal experience. My eyes were ten ten, then I started to read Thomas Hardy excessively on my phone. I finished some 13 volumes, reading day and night.

The next time I visited optometrist he said my eyes were eight eight.

So it's how I owe my glasses to Thomas Hardy!

We wrote in a case he/she wanted to check his post sometimes in the future.

I use e-reading only when I have something that can't be acquired in paper form.

Exactly the same here. Too much reading electronic versions is too bad for eyesight.