Ant Sinclair

Oh come on please Strange, You have a rank of Genius and 1800+ rep points, You Should be able to work this out!

Again you're welcome Strange, if you remember from an earlier post on this thread I said I would show you the Higgs/Bose Particles bigger brother, well here it is; if I divide 7.0319e-25 by 1.246e-27 I find it's approximately 564.358 times the mass size of the 1.246e-27 particle, if I then divide the 564.358 by 3 I get 188 times the mass of the 1.246e-27 particle.Does this mean the particle CERN found was just one third, one "string" of a whole, ie the actual Higgs/Bose Particle is in the range of 564 times the mass of the proton? And if so the Higgs/Bose Particle's bigger brother is the one marked in orange. Would you like to know what the other colour highlights allude to Strange?

Here is the list, the particle masses are on the right hand side ending with Kg. The masses are highlighted deliberately.

If you're not really interested don't comment, after all no one is forcing you to, I think you should stick with things you comprehend Strange Attached Swansont is a table of 81 frequencies, 72 of them higher frequencies and 9 low frequencies, are the 72 higher frequencies of High Spectral Ra dience, ie do they stand out/above other CMB frequencies?, this is to pave the way for descriptions to follow.

Please explain this to I SwansonT

In which language does his name mean that? And why "his" and not "her" (or "its")? If you would like to discuss this any further I suggest you split it from this thread. What Particle List? - Come On Strange, keep on the ball! Yes SwansonT there is a discrete spectrum of Ra diences if I comprehend what you mean, there are more frequencies(HSRs) to be shown yet, there are a lot of frequencies that originate from matter - All Matter "Sings".

Like Planck, Heisenberg and others, Yes I believe in Intelligent Design, I know His name Thrice and His name meaning is;The Great One From Before The Beginning of time, The One with Great Intent Who ever gave the -1rep for my above comment it shall not bother I, I have now given 35 frequencies that can be checked in the CMB, I have also now given above the Particle List, as I said to Strange earlier - He who laughs last......

Really? - Yes Strange, You know I have a special kind of fondness for You And why would objects....? - Look at Max Planck's quote on the bottom of each of my answers! How long you wait shall depend on how busy at the time I be ;-)

Your welcome Strange In the attached jpeg, would this be the correct way to calculate mass with 0 momentum?

The M is for metre Strange, I have a few hours work left to do today and I shall be able to show You all the Higgs/Bose particles "bigger-brother" and how I am able to map 99% of the CMB Ra diences.

There is one other frequency that I hope to have confirmed or dismissed, the frequency is 18.067GHz(3 x 18.067 = 54.203GHz), I have seen the 54GHz frequency once before and it could be of significance. If this frequency is there, I think the mathematicians will like it's source/root, this will save I time in being able to describe the mechanics better to You all. I shall not ask for any others to be confirmed and believe that 99% of CMB Ra diences can have their source/root identified. Mordred I don't know if I should have had these thoughts or not, but here they are anyway; "is the timing of the Cambrian Radiation(Explosion) coincidental at 565 million years ago and that life appeared to "start" recovering at 545 million years ago?, What relative velocity are We(the Earth. milkyway etc) travelling at?"

I shall keep endeavoring SwansonT, even though this lot pains My little brain.

Strange, I have given twenty five frequencies to "check" so far and thought that the real geniuses that frequent Sf.net would be able to say Ye or Ne to their existence in a short period of time, I was trained to work on Instrumentation & Electrical systems that control continuous process plants such as Power Stations and Chemical Plants, and as the gentleman Sensei pointed out on a previous thread did not train as a scientist. It would be good to have the 216Hz and the last eighteen frequencies given verified or dismissed by someone else(an expert) so I can move forward or not with this thread, if the frequencies are not there then I have been barking up the wrong tree. I can look at Planck's results as in the attached jpeg, but the resolution to confirm the frequencies is not there, and this is the reason I need help to ascertain accurate frequency results from Planck, WMAP & COBE. The most important frequency to I at the moment is the 216Hz, if that frequency is there it would take I back to the start of My journey into the workings of the "Universe" ie 432(Hz) see attached jpeg. Whatever the outcome of My little journey I have learned lots of things I never knew before and so it has not been a waste of My time, and as such shall not go to My grave as dumb as the day I exited My Mother's womb. I don't envy you Gentlemen of Knowledge, I admire You!

In seeing that no body seems interested in this thread I shall now close it. ANY INFORMATION/DRAWINGS/CALCULATIONS ON THIS THREAD ARE MY PERSONAL WORKS AND I DO NOT AUTHORISE THEIR USE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM! !!!

Numerology? - He who laughs last......

I find Your reply strange Strange, I expected You to enquire to where the 2C, 4C & 6C had come from?

Here is a longer list of higher frequencies that should show up in CMB observations; 6C / 3.1416mm = 572.561GHz 6C / 1.77245mm = 1014.84GHz 6C / 3.1416M = 572.561MHz 6C / 1.77245M = 1014.84MHz 6C / 3141.6M = 572.561KHz 6C / 1772.45M =1014.84KHz Then 4C by the same set of wave lengths giving; 381.707GHz 676.561GHz 381.707MHz 676.561MHz 381.707KHz 676.561KHz Then the same again for 2C; 338.280GHz 190.853GHz 338.280MHz 190.853MHz 338.280KHz 190.853KHz Are these to be seen as High-Spectral Radiances in the CMB as well as the previous 7 frequencies given?

I have, as in a previous thread Mordred concurred there is a High-spectral Radiance in the CMB of approximately 162Ghz, when I calculated this frequency loss via Red-Shift I got 595MLY , I asked a String-theorist to check this for I and He calculated 565MLY, and thought His figure was most likely correct and hence the figure stated. Isn't this kind of calculation bread & butter to You very well educated gentlemen?

I suppose there could be all sorts of things, but without any evidence, why would we imagine there is. The structures you suggest seem implausible for a number of reasons. I think something that large would be either be directly visible or detectable by its gravitational effect on nearby galaxies and galaxy clusters. Without any evidence? - I've given 6 frequencies(less 565MLY less Red-Shift Frequency loss, surely there are many here can calculate this loss) that could be checked out against COBE, WMAP & Planck Observations. These Structures would what some may have described as Singularities, Modern Scientists can't even concur on what a Black Hole is yet can they. Feynman & Stueckelberg said that Antimatter is the same as Matter just travelling in the opposite direction. Have You Strange or any others here carried out any checks on the frequencies I have quoted? Is there also a 1387928.04629 wave length to be seen in COBE, WMAP or Planck?

3.1km Diameter structure at 565MLY distance huge? NASA don't even see them approaching Earth until the last minute do they, let alone at a distance that big

The Double Toroids and their Frequencies; Could there be three Double Toroids, best described as rings within rings, made of an unknown ferro-magnetic type material and with unknown axial supports that share the same centre positions physically in the vacuum, 565MLY from where Earth is now. The Rings are sized in proportion to Pi and the square root of Pi ie 3.1412 & 1.77245. The three sets of Toroids are of the following dimensions with the largest pair first; 3141.6M(Outer) with a 1772.45M(Inner), 3.1416M(Outer) & 1.77245M(Inner) and the smallest 0.0031416M(Outer) & 0.00177245M(Inner). The Toroids are all rotating, the Inner Toroids are rotating about a horizontal axis and the Outer Toroids are spinning about a vertical axis. The smallest Inner Toroid is rotating fastest with 169.135GHz Cycles, the smallest Outer Toroid cycling at 95.427GHz. The middle sized Inner Toroid cycling at 169.135MHz and it's partnered Outer Toroid frequenting 95.427MHz. And the same again for the largest set with it's pair of Toroids spinning at 169.135KHz and 95.427KHz See attached jpeg. 1) Pi e-3, SqRt Pi e-3 f1 = C/Lambda = f1 = C/0.0031416M = 95.427GHz and f2 = C/SqRt Pi = 169.135GHz 2) Pi, SqRt Pi f3 = C/3.1416M = 95.427MHz and f4 =C/1.7725M = 169.135MHz 3)Pi e3, SqRt Pi e3 f5 = C/3141.6M = 95.427KHz and f6 =C/1772.5M = 169.135KHz. Can these sets of frequencies be seen in COBE, WMAP or Planck observations less the Red-Shift Frequency loss equivalent to 565MLY? Spiral Wave and Electron Jump; The Speed of Light C / 6 = 49 965 409.66 recurringM / 6 = 8 327 568.277recurringM / 6 = 1387928.04629 with 629 recurringM wave length of the Spiral-Wave. C / 1 387 928.04629M = 216Hz. Could these Spiral-Waves be responsible for the Audible range of frequencies seen in the CMB? Our Dual-Verses Dimensions and Shape; I was reading an article that was discussing Electron Jumps and it stated that the Electron-Jump was complete after 1e20 cycles, Photons are Leptons just as Electrons are, could One expect them to behave similarly? If I multiply 1 387 928.04629M x 1e20 I get 1 387 928.04629e26M, 1 387 928.04629e26M / 1LY = 14.670411BLY - Is this the correct size of the Observable Universe? Does a second Photon-Jump then occur at 1 387 928.04629M x 1e22 that give Echos from 1.467041TLY (T = trillion)? The shape of Our Dual-Verse being similar to two wide angled cones of 58.8608 Degress from the Outer Toroids and 121.1392 Degrees from the Inner Toroids, giving an Outer Cone Angle of 121.1392 Degrees see attached drawing. Matter can Only form where the high frequency and low frequency emmissions from the Toroids cross each other, ie from the attached jpeg matter would be able to form only in the green hatched area.

Wasn't Ahkenaten the first to promote Monotheism?