Rajnish Kaushik

There can be many reasons, like heavy programming software, games or so. I need a powerful pc for animation and game development. I also need some power when I need to host a web server on my local machine or so. Other then gaming, many companies provide powerful machines to developers to reduce the compile time of code so more time is spent on coding then waiting for code compilation.

((((((((((((((((3^2)^2)^2)*3)^2)*3)^2)*3)^2)^2)^2)^2)*3)^2)^2)^2)

 

I would think this is the quickest way

 

I will leave why this is what I have come up with as an exercise - unless you really want to know in which case tell me

=81^1250

yeah this way is most easy

9^2500=81^1250=6561^625

(6561^5)^125= Best Of Luck Dude :')

As far as we know, nothing is too small to be affected by gravity. In our current models, even the smallest particles have a gravitational affect on each other.

However, as far as I know, this this has never been checked experimentally. Maybe there is some small gravitational perturbation that can be seen in the collisions of particle accelerators? Someone with more expertise than I could maybe comment on that.

So the current understanding of gravity is given by models that are amazingly accurate in the regimes were we have experimentally checked them. And according to those models, there is nothing too small to be not affected by gravity.

Source - How to Get Your Own Element Collection

This is the best i found

This isn't really a way to collect elements, but if you're interested in elements, here are some of the very best books. Some are stories that may not have a whole lot to do with elements, others have factual information about each element.
Uncle Tungsten, by Oliver Sacks (Literary)
Nature's Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements, by John Emsley (Factual)
The Elements, by John Emsley (Factual)
The Periodic Table, by Primo Levi (Literary)
Discovery of the Elements, by Jim Marshall. (Factual)
Rediscovery of the Elements, by Jim Marshall. (Factual)
Living With Radiation: The First Hundred Years, by William Kolb and Paul Frame (factual)

Try to explain why nothing can go faster than speed of light without using the term relativistic mass.

Can it be done?

well, you cannot fit something so easily into others brains without any solid proof that this particle is moving faster then light which is quite impossible since if you try to measure something faster then light then how will you see it?

no matter how much you try you cannot observe it since you need light to observe something.

for example,

if you send a particle you know faster then light about a light year away and maybe it do reach the distance before light but.... you will only be able to observe it only when the light from it comes back which will obviously take 1 year and if you add the processing time in it then it will obviously give result which shows that it was slower then light or equal to speed of light.

well, this is my theory to agree or not is all upto you.

Hope I made sense.

I find myself attracted to heavier girls more than most.

 

But I don't understand why?

 

Is there a way to fully explain why I'm attracted to them? I figured there were people here who knew enough to tell me why.

Its upto personal prospective as what you find attractive in women

i saw a documentary about a year ago on discovery channel and they said that women with big bottom are preferred by our subconscious mind as they make healthier babies

so maybe this can be one of the reasons

We all know that SOUND is a wave but sound waves cannot transmit through glass

 

if LIGHT is a wave then how can they transmit through glass

 

so can we say that light is a particle.

 

please explain...

Light have both particle and wave nature and that's what I learned in 9th grade.

There was a huge debate in the time of Newton and there were different scientist suggesting different things and they finally concluded that light have both particle and wave nature

Hello everybody.

Im beginner in science.And i planning to work on project.If you already watched SAO(Sword Art Online) you must know about Nerve Gear.Im going to make Nerve Gear on real life.If you dont know about Nerver Gear i will introduce it.Nerve Gear is helmet that will stop your movement and send you in to 3D game world.That's what i want to make real.My project name is "Ecto Gear".Im exploring about brain.How to connect brain to server?This is my first answer.But i think its possible.And my plan is connect brain to server based on computer and server will connect it directly to Virtual Character.Only thing that i want to know is this possible?Please leave me answer or your opinions.

 

Hope you will help me.

I will love to help you develop it and i volunteer for alpha and beta testing

and i am already making a 3d game which can be vr compatible so lets see how long can this go

best of luck!!!

well numbers does not start from 0...

they have no beginning and we call it NEGATIVE INFINITY

and they does not have any end and we call it POSITIVE INFINITY

if u give me a huge negative number then i will subtract 1 from it and will give u an even smaller number

same goes for larger

the disk thing is something we made to visualize the positive number line but it have its limitations as clearly stated in your question

Hi, i wonder if it's theoretically possible to make the human mind, learn something big, like math, instantly?

 

Like in the movies, (Ex. Matrix)

 

Thanks in advance.

well not exactly...

still as per my knowledge animated videos helps pretty well in remembering things

also some knowledge of image building can help you remember things instantly and it will last pretty long

there is no method which can make a 4 year old learn quantum mechanics instantly

it is possible only after enough knowledge and practice

still i can be wrong...

hope I helped

!

Moderator Note

 

OT commentary has been split

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/93681-split-from-can-the-laws-of-physics-be-wrong/

 

what does that mean ? .--.

Humans use carbon dioxide in many different ways. The most familiar example is its use in soft drinks and beer, to make them fizzy. Carbon dioxide released by baking powder or yeast makes cake batter rise.
Some fire extinguishers use carbon dioxide because it is denser than air. Carbon dioxide can blanket a fire, because of its heaviness. It prevents oxygen from getting to the fire and as a result, the burning material is deprived of the oxygen it needs to continue burning.
Carbon dioxide is also used in a technology called supercritical fluid extraction that is used to decaffeinate coffee. The solid form of carbon dioxide, commonly known as Dry Ice, is used in theatres to create stage fogs and make things like "magic potions" bubble.

Carbon dioxide is one of the most abundant gasses in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide plays an important part in vital plant and animal process, such as photosynthesis and respiration. These processes will be briefly explained here.

Green plants convert carbon dioxide and water into food compounds, such as glucose, and oxygen. This process is called photosynthesis.

The reaction of photosynthesis is as follows:
6 CO₂ + 6 H₂O --> C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6 O₂

Plants and animals, in turn, convert the food compounds by combining it with oxygen to release energy for growth and other life activities. This is the respiration process, the reverse of photosynthesis.

The respiration reaction is as follows:
C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6 O₂ --> 6 CO₂ + 6 H₂O

Photosynthesis and respiration play an important role in the carbon cycle and are at equilibrium with one another.
Photosynthesis dominates during the warmer part of the year and respiration dominates during the colder part of the year. However, both processes occur the entire year. Overall, then, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere decreases during the growing season and increases during the rest of the year.
Because the seasons in the northern and southern hemispheres are opposite, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is increasing in the north while decreasing in the south, and vice versa. The cycle is more clearly present in the northern hemisphere; because it has relatively more land mass and terrestrial vegetation. Oceans dominate the southern hemisphere.

Influence of carbon dioxide on alkalinity

Carbon dioxide can change the pH of water. This is how it works:

Carbon dioxide dissolves slightly in water to form a weak acid called carbonic acid, H₂CO₃, according to the following reaction:
CO₂ + H₂O --> H₂CO₃

After that, carbonic acid reacts slightly and reversibly in water to form a hydronium cation, H₃O+, and the bicarbonate ion, HCO³-, according to the following reaction:
H₂CO₃ + H₂O --> HCO₃^- + H₃O⁺

This chemical behaviour explains why water, which normally has a neutral pH of 7 has an acidic pH of approximately 5.5 when it has been exposed to air.

Knock Knock

Whose this

Man

Who man?

Human!!

.

.

.

.

well that was lame :')

 

Of course later knowledge will, in general, take us further.

That is the nature of progress.

 

However later knowledge may add to, replace or disprove existing knowledge.

I gained the distinct impression you were only considering the last mentioned case.

 

Exactly what i had in my mind from the start.

Sometimes we have to change or modify the current set of laws in order to get the new discovered things to fit in without making the current knowledge or sometimes we have to make a completely new theory to define the new discovered behavior.

 

Do you mean some discovery that would make mainstream science useless, and take us all back to square one so we could all learn the new paradigm together?

Something similar..

Like if we find out that the particle which we think are base of everything are no where close to being base but there are many other particles forming them and no current laws can explain their behavior....well, i m just asking questions...

Maybe there are some particle out there but we are not able to discover them since we are not even trying to discover them ..

we are searching for things which fits in out prospective and if we come across such particles them we reject them as a fault in the equipment

Just a theory though :')

You know everything can be explained by science... probably

About the psi-wheel well its already proven that its because of the heat flow most of the time since if the air around the wheel heats up then the surrounding cold air rushes in and thus spins the wheel and it seems like a magic

Once the trick is revealed there is no fun in watching the magic anymore :')

Ha ha ha....... of course not EVERY particle in the universe is governed by the same laws (Laws of physics for example) it doesn't work like that, That's why we assigned them into groups, like the laws of thermodynamics versus Mendel's laws in Thermal Dynamics and Biology. You can't build a city with just one type of building can you? That's why there are hundreds of sets of scientific laws, each pertaining to it's own niche, some even bridging over into other little subgroups of laws with laws from various groups to explain why said proton went in said way. Science is diverse you know...

can there be some particles which does not obey any of the current set of laws we have and we will have to re-think everything after that?

The are laws of gravity and physics and some others and we are not able to break them by now because we think that they are absolute so we design things accordingly which can never break those laws,

So to break the laws we have to make new stuff which don't follow them from the start

and yeah there may be many consequences to that

Well, i think that there cannot be a set of some laws which determine the behavoiur of every particle in the universe.

We come across many videos which shows objects which does not follows the laws which we think are final.

I may be wrong but still i will like to hear your views on this so I posted it in Speculations.

Was big bang a white hole?

Maybe the first things which got into our universe were sent to us from another parallel universe by a black hole.

P.S- This is my theory, you don't necessarily need to agree to it :')

 

That doesn't make much sense.

well.....sorry but i don't believe in telekinesis and i believe it can be easily explained with science

Telekinesis is just pure science and illusion just like magic...atleast that's what i think

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BIWhNh5V6Q

Well, watch this video it explains everything properly

 

Shouldn't that be 351765 ?

can you please explain .-. sorry to be really dumb ._. writer and wrlter....

well...according to me the universe was created by a white hole (opposite to black hole) which transferred the materials from another universe to this another parallel dimension universe and so it was created by a cosmic phenomena and not god,....

I want to change my behaviour from a 10 year old kiddish child to an mature 14 year science student and start giving logical answers?