Chriss

Maybe they can find two brain regions that are forming or maturing their connection at this age. Here is a news on a similar study https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170327083433.htm

18 minutes ago, Strange said:

How do you know that? 

Just more baseless claims.

After I could recognize intelligence I became obsessed with it and at 27 and a half I discovered the intelligence cycle. My brother could recognize it at 29 and a half, he has a lower intelligence than me.

50 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

I'm guessing you're about 25... 

After 25 I could recognize intelligence.

On 10.12.2017 at 7:48 PM, iNow said:

Try me

There is an age at which intelligence can be recognized. It depends on the person's intelligence. The ones that are intelligent can recognize it at about 18 yo and the ones that are less at about 35 - 40 yo old and even more.

Well I have an observation regarding intelligence, also, but I won't reveal it as you don't believe me anyway !

Well, I don't respond to such question as how I recognize intelligence ! It's derisory!

Someone said about studies.

You said a study was done on intelligence. They definitely weren't looking for the intelligence cycle because science is intentional. Watch this video

45 minutes ago, Strange said:

You said you did it subjectively. Were you lying?

No.

15 hours ago, Endy0816 said:

That's subjective, not objective.

 

IQ tests are dubious at best.  For no reason I can tell you're trying to link this already dubious concept to birth date.

Understandably people are responding negatively here.

This idea is not to gloat about intelligence, but it is the fundamental truth about intelligence.

It is not subjective because I evaluate each intelligence how it really is.

2 hours ago, Strange said:

If that is true, then your correlation of intelligence with date of birth is meaningless. 

It is not meaningless because I observed theirs intelligence without knowing any IQ and arrange them in the order of their birthdays. Do you can recognize intelligence ? If yes you can start recall people you know and do what I did and see...

On 25.10.2017 at 8:53 PM, Lord Antares said:

You can guess (with some degree of certainty) generally how smart one can be. It's not hard to see when someone is smart or dumb but what is hard is guessing an exact number based on your amateurish and limited experience with people. Guessing in such a way and calling it research is downright laughable.

Seeing how you ignored my request of the calculation which would immediately disprove your "hypothesis" and some other people's suggestions, it is safe to say there is no reason to continue this thread.

I don't guess any number. I evaluate about where is someone's place on the cycle. It is useless to calculate because there are different intelligence tests which gives you different results. I did 3 types of tests and gave me different scores. In intelligence measurement they have no standard test. Or you tell me what is the standard test ?

On 25.10.2017 at 8:53 PM, John Cuthber said:

Stop making up excuses.

There are lists of students who graduate top of their class who can reasonably be assumed to be bright.

 

Where can I find the list ?

3 hours ago, Strange said:

And yet you claim to be able to deduce the intelligence of people just by looking at them.

Yes I can know their intelligence by observing them. Only I can ?! You can't know if you know a person if he is more or less intelligent than you ? What's so hard ?

In regard to memory I also observed memory of persons that I know, and it corresponds to where they are placed on the cycle of memory !

On 15.10.2017 at 11:45 AM, John Cuthber said:

 

Spot the difference.

OK, set up a test of memory and see if the results are linked to date of birth.

Or even look at the dates of birth of famous athletes- presumably their physical energy is above the norm.

I think you will find a small effect of season of the year, but not one for phase of the moon.

Come back with data I might even help out with the analysis.

 

Here's a start.

Find the dates of birth of this lot; most of them will be on line somewhere

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_multiple_Olympic_gold_medalists

 

I can't do memory tests as I am not a psychologist.

In sport you have also to be talented.

22 hours ago, John Cuthber said:

If you want to test the hypothesis that "clever people are born at the full moon" then any sort of measure of "cleverness" would do.

 

I did not said the clever people are born under the full moon. There are separate cycles and how they intersect when someone is born, that way he is marked by them. I don't know what makes someone creative. People born under full moon have a powerful memory and physical energy.

Why it took so long since discovering the dispersion of light until they discovered elements by spectral analysis ?

Do you know the name of the test that I gave the link for ? I like that one.

8 minutes ago, dylrovertson said:

Please tell me about the details.

Thanks.

What details ?

Hello,

I am looking for a good intelligence test online. Something like this one http://www.testq.com/education/quizzes/121-the-classic-iq-test (which is good but it doesn't show me the options to choose at some question).

Thank you !

4 minutes ago, Lord Antares said:

To be fair, the cycle in his chart repeats every 3 months, so it would be expected that the average IQ of the 4 seasons would be the same, even if his chart was correct (which it isn't). Fair enough. I've got another proof that he is wrong.

OP, do some math now, the thing you were supposed to be doing from the start. Take your chart. Write down the IQ of every single date in your 3 month period. Write down the average IQ. This will prove that you are incorrect.

Meanwhile, I'm off to find some data on specific dates of birth and intelligence.

The cycle doesn't repeat itself at 3 months, there are fragments on it where intelligence increases from a lower point to peak in a few days, for example from 24 august 1986 which is not at the bottom but lower and in 1 or 2 september is the peak. In my chart I don't know if 20 january 1985 is the lowest point, it could be 15 january but is hard for me to observe this low. It is very easy to observe people more intelligent than me.

20 minutes ago, Strange said:

What is wrong with you? It is a study of the relationship between birth date (season) and IQ. Can you show anything about their methodology or analysis that is flawed? Come on, you claim to have a high IQ, show us where they have gone wrong.

Or are you rejecting it, without even reading it, because of your blind faith in your wild guess?

I've read it. I don't know why they didn't found the cycle ! I don't know !

4 hours ago, Lord Antares said:

Since you refuse to consider failure, here's another link for a scientific study of thousands of children (which, no doubt, you will say is flawed):

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16953958

 

9 minutes ago, Lord Antares said:

Reply to the last study I linked, or get ignored. It is only fair that we ignore you if you ignore the studies and you're the one complaining that there are no studies on this.

Maybe they didn't think to arrange people in the order of birth. Should I contact them ?

1 minute ago, Strange said:

So you know how good their memory was from when they were born. And this confirms your "theory" that memory is related to birthdate.

Do you not realise how monumentally stupid that is?

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/53/Begging-the-Question

Even if true (*) this proves nothing. 

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cherry_picking

(*) You provide no support or references for this and so, based on the reliability of things you say, I assume it is not true.

I can't prove it unless I find someone to do a study. I thought you are interested in ideas and myabe can help.

41 minutes ago, Strange said:

How do you know what either Volta's or Newton's memory was like?

I watched how the moon was when they were born. Also Darwin had a weak memory. He was at two days before new moon. The cycle of memory and physical energy. It's both. You won't find a person with good memory and weak physical energy.

2 minutes ago, John Cuthber said:

Just for the record and not because a single data point makes any real difference; Richard Feynman- noted polymath, genius and bright bloke was born 11 May 1918 under a new moon.

He is, in fact, a counter example to the OP's assertion. (So are my brother, my mum and my dad- though I was born fairly near the full moon).

Based on this laughable sample size of 5 it seems that most bright people are not born at the full moon.

 

Why do you mix the cycle of intelligence with the cycle of memory ? They are two different things !

For example Alessandro Volta was born at 3 days from the peak of the cycle of intelligence and at two days before new moon, so he got a lower memory level. Newton was born close to the full moon.