Jump to content

Sensei

Senior Members
  • Posts

    7683
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Everything posted by Sensei

  1. There is large difference between them: - Apple designs iPhone, and iOS is their own product, 3rd party companies, Chinese are producing it. - Samsung is electronic company designing Samsung Galaxy Sx etc. and producing them by them self, but operating system, Android is licensed from Google. 3rd party company. Apple can add anything they want to their product and OS, as they have direct control over operating system and device. Samsung is not in such luxury position. They're limited to what Google will give them. Personally I have Samsung Galaxy S5. Apple has some nasty politics for 3rd party applications developers. Google have much better. I can host my own Android application on my FTP server (with HTTP), and then visit that website from device, and app will be installed without any problems. Without any bothering either Google/Samsung companies. For spy-aps like f.e. GPS moniting app for truck transport company, it's the only way, as Google Play Store disallows apps that gather data without knowledge of user of app (truck driver).
  2. Slightly derailing your original thread: why not use balloons.. ? As long as it's less dense than surrounding atmosphere, it'll be flying and gathering data much longer than any airplane, or rocket.. You don't want to spend time flying couple years, spending billions of dollars, just to arrive and find out engine does not work.
  3. The question is for how long water has to increase its level. If it's minutes, hours, and locally (not entire worldwide) tsunami is way to go. It could be created by collapse of volcano or mounting into sea, causing massive movement of water. As well as hit by object from cosmos like meteor or comet. Search YouTube for "tsunami caused by landslide". There are some recorded on video. Increase of temperature and melting ice is so slow that everybody, or at least the most of people would be able to escape it.
  4. If you're on board of space ship, and hit object with well known force, it'll accelerate object. Object that has large mass, will be accelerated to smaller velocity. Object that has small mass, will be accelerated to bigger velocity. Search google how is measured mass of atoms in mass spectrometry.. Say you have particles all with charge -1e, and masses m1=0.511 MeV/c^2 (electron), m2=105.66 MeV/c^2 (muon-), m3=139 MeV/c^2 (pion-). If you accelerate them using electrodes with well known potential, smaller rest-mass particle will be accelerated to higher velocity. Gravity can be ignored.
  5. Helium-2 is extremely unstable isotope: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_helium#Helium-2_.28diproton.29 Do you really carefully rethink it.. ? Are you aware that neutron decays to proton, electron, and anti-neutrino? [math]n^0 \rightarrow p^+ + e^- + \bar{V}_e + 0.782 MeV[/math] Your theory instantly violates Lepton number conservation.. If neutron is up,up,up,e-,e- and after decay one of e- is emitted, then proton would have to be up,up,up,e- since then beginning.. ??? IMHO you don't know quantum physics enough to know the all decay modes of all particles.. Concentrate on filling this gap.
  6. You probably don't know, but fusion of two protons produce positron and neutrino, and release 420 keV energy... [math]p^+ + p^+ \rightarrow D^+ + e^+ + v_e + 0.42 MeV[/math]
  7. Explosion turns solids to gases, or liquids to gases. While breaking solid in parts, like breaking cup, newly made parts generally remain in the same state of matter. However some atoms can change state on the edge. f.e. meteors are melting in air while passing by atmosphere. They change state because of enormous energy.
  8. It's not heat. It's conversion of internal energy (bonds between quarks, atoms, electrons and molecules), to kinetic energy of newly produced parts. Unbroken cup has one momentum for entire object. They act like one piece. After breaking each broken part has its own momentum, and flying in its own direction. Better illustration is quantum physics, fusion or decay of atom. f.e. Uranium-238 at rest will decay to Thorium-234 and Helium-4 with decay energy 4.267 MeV (in this case converted to kinetic energy of Th-234 and alpha particle, majority to alpha). Reverse of this process would be shooting alpha particles at Thorium-234 target to receive Uranium-238 back.. Chemistry equivalent experiment: we have KNO3, Sulfur and Carbon, all solid, after ignition they turn to gases, the better adjusted amounts, the more gas, and the more powerful explosion. Reverse of it would be turning these gases back to solid state KNO3, Sulfur, and Carbon from CO2, SO2, etc. But if you would catch all these gases, they would loose all their energies, in kinetic energy originally owned, and cool down, so they wouldn't be able to. Compounds are in lower energy state than they were initially, prior explosion.
  9. If they asked for grams, like you said above... ...they cannot accept answer in moles.. Units don't match. Right. Proportions, any kind, wouldn't be given with units.. to get 0.006 mol you multiplied 0.01177 mol * 0.5646 = 0.006645 mol But you should multiply initial mass: 4.32 g * 0.5646 = 2.4389 g or from moles: 0.01177 mol * 207.2 g/mol (Pb mass) = 2.4389 g Ratio 0.5646+0.4354=1 is of course from mass of Pb / total mass, and mass of Br/total mass. Unitless.
  10. 100 W = 0.1 kWh/h * 24h * 30d = 72 kWh/month Here we pay $0.165/kWh. Which would be $11.87 for all the time running light bulb. Why don't you simply put metal with high resistance to water, it'll be like heating element, or heating element by itself, like for making tea ($2 cost or so). You could control amount of energy simply by adjusting where is wire plugged to 2nd end.
  11. Michel, iceberg, or snow, is not made of the same particles. It might looks similar for human imperfect eye, but it's not in the same configuration.. If you would be able to assign identifiers to each particle of water (or any other), you could trace where they're going and where are in the cyclic process the "next time".. And every snowflake is unique. In the case of cup, there is only one configuration of broken parts, where they fit, and were they where prior breaking.
  12. DrP voted for Isoamyl acetate, Imatfaal and hypervalent iodine for Isobutyl Acetate. There is easy way to check which is true: by its melting point. Isoamyl acetate has −78 °C, and Isobutyl Acetate has -99 °C. Using dry ice will make one of them solid? Or liquid nitrogen will be needed? ps. N2Microbes, you need to use IR spectroscopy, or you can do whatever you like to identify compound? I would burn it in controlled environment, to produce CO2 and H2O, and measure amount of gas produced.. Butyl acetate has BP at 126.1 °C, and RI 1.3941, closer to measured values. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butyl_acetate
  13. If h2 and h3 are absolute, not relative (unlike your original post) then [latex] 2V= \frac{\pi r_2^2 h_2}{3}[/latex] and [latex] \frac{9}{4}V= \frac{\pi r_3^2 h_3}{3} [/latex] are true.. You never said that 2V is difference in volumes between the smallest cone and middle.. "If we use V as the volume of the bottom cone, then middle cone is 2V and the outer (largest) cone is 9/4V. " so I assumed Vsmall=V, Vmiddle=2V, Vouter=9/4V
  14. Right. Shouldn't be here [latex]2V= \frac{\pi r_2^2 (h_1+h_2)}{3}[/latex] ?? Shouldn't be here [latex]\frac{9}{4}V= \frac{\pi r_3^2 (h_1+h_2+h_3)}{3}[/latex] ?? According to this info h2 and h3 are partial heights: "h3 - from the top of the outer cone to the top of middle cone h2 - from the top of middle cone to the top of bottom one h1 - from the top of inner cone to the ground"
  15. That's up-side-down quantum physics... More mass-energy from decaying smaller mass-energy particle.. ? That's instant violation of energy conservation.. f.e. muon is elementary particle in Standard Model, but the all particles mass-energies it is decaying to, are smaller than rest-mass of muon, 105.66 MeV/c^2. f.e. [math]\mu^-\rightarrow e^- + \bar{V}_e + V_{\mu}[/math] [math]m_e = 0.510998928 MeV/c^2[/math] The all known particles ALWAYS decay to particles with less mass-energy than they have prior decay, to conserve energy..
  16. Do you what me to foresee your future? You will be banned soon from this forum..
  17. The best file explorer was Directory Opus 5 for AmigaOS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directory_Opus (before v5 it looked like GUI-like Norton Commander, forget these versions) The all explorers built-in Windows are really crap, in comparison to it. I really miss DOpus 5, whenever I have to do any file manipulation on my disks.. DOpus exists for Windows since v6. But it's somewhat different than v5 Magellan. This feature to call batch operation on selected files seems interesting around 11 minute of video. Also cool to see preview of .txt file after hovering file by mouse. Heh, after opening file by some process, and trying to delete file, DOpus is showing which process locked file, so you know what to shut-down and then retry delete.. Cool feature..
  18. Resistors have color code printed on them. Check what is nominal value of it this way.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_color_code (or Google "resistor color code") Multimeter can be damaged. I have one such showing wrong measurements. It was destroyed by too high voltage.. Or battery can be exhausted. Replace it by fresh one, for a moment, to see whether there is difference.
  19. I don't understand why are you saying 'no'. If we have -1e in center of electron, and photon that has -1e and +1e, then it's exactly like in mine post above. Then why're you saying 'no'? Doesn't make sense to me. Photon has neutral charge 0e My equation was for Q, electric charge inside of electron or positron. Qelectron=-1e-1e+1e=-1e Qpositron=+1e+1e-1e=+1e Then photon has to have Qphoton=+1e-1e=0e That's the only way to not have instant violation of electric charge conservation, within your framework from post #1. Explain me your correction.. But you're moving too slow. After half-year when you're not here, you should have spend time on learning the all leptons, mesons and baryons decays.. You should came up with ready theory that has everything what we already know about them. Annihilation violated your model instantly. I just did in post #8... Photons with high energy can be created by f.e. - cosmic rays, - decay of unstable radioactive isotope - decay of unstable particle f.e. [math]\pi^0\rightarrow\gamma+\gamma[/math] (neutral pion meson decay, it has ~135 MeV/c^2 rest-mass) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion#Neutral_pion_decays - fusion in the star f.e. [math]p^+ + D^+ \rightarrow He^3+\gamma+5.49 MeV[/math] - annihilation of mesons or baryons. In other words: they're not from annihilation of electron and positron. At least not stationary electron-positron in our FoR.
  20. Do you want to explain gravity by subtle electrostatic force interactions.. ? If yes, I have something for you: Isotope of element has the same quantity of protons, same quantity of electrons, but different quantity of neutrons in atom, thus different mass. So if you would take 1 ton of Iron-54 it would have: 10^6 g / 53.9396 g/mol = 18539.255 mol of Fe-54 (multiply by 6.022141*10^23 to get absolute quantity of atoms, then multiply by 26 to get protons/electrons absolute quantity) Same quantity of protons and electrons of Fe-56 would have mass: 18539.255 mol * 55.9349 g/mol = 1036991.4 g = ~1.037 ton Should or shouldn't have different gravitational force more massive Iron-56 ore.. ?
  21. If I recall correctly your older theories, you're postulating existence of sub-particles each with -1e and +1e (and they're not electron/positron). So, to have electron with -1e for outer observer, there is needed -1e -1e +1e sub-particles inside of electron, to have -1e total.. Right? So, positron will have exactly reverse configurations: +1e +1e -1e to have +1e total? Now, what happens during pair-production? Photon has energy 1.022 MeV or more, and 0e charge, after collision there are made electron and positron pair. y + 1.022 MeV -> e+ + e- So photon had to have all these 6 sub-particles inside, right? So far it holds, sort of. But now there is annihilation of newly produced electron-positron: e+ + e- -> y + y (each with 510998.928 eV) If electron has +1-1-1 and positron has -1+1+1, there is no such configuration in which there could be created 2 neutral photons from them.. Possible output configurations are: -1-1-1 = -3e -1-1+1 = -1e -1+1+1 = +1e +1+1+1 = +3e Or I am missing something? 1836.15x more mass/energy (938.272046/0.510998928 = 1836.15267)
  22. You're author of this website, otherwise your thread has no sense. Nobody would spend so much of time to write about other person website, except author.. Or hired by him/her employee.. What equation? I don't see any equations that has anything to do with science... What can we calculate using equation.. ? Proton mass? Electron mass? Physical constants? Anything?
  23. Sensei

    Infinity

    Nonsense. Take for example highly accelerated electron passing through particle detector and leaving trace, Electron is (was) in the center of that trace, and ionizing medium it passed by. And we observe trace. Or photons from trace. Occasionally if electron will hit nucleus (especially heavy metal) it can bounce from it. And trace is also bend.
  24. Solid state salt + addition of water from rain -> solution. Ions are (more or less) evenly spread in solution. Solution evaporates because of Sun and temperature -> when there is high concentration of salt in small amount of water, solid state crystals are starting growing. Crystals have highly organized structure. That's standard procedure of making crystals in laboratories: evaporate water below saturation point and wait.
  25. Act of observation, either direct (by eye) or indirect (by camera), is stealing photons from environment. That's, photons which would normally bounce back and forth, are absorbed by eye, or by sensor in device, and are no longer part of system under observation. "Observation"/"measurement" in context of double slit experiment, often means usage of polarization filter. Act of measurement in electronics, electricity, is also changing state of circuit. If you plug Ampere meter serial in circuit it has as small as possible resistance, to not influence measured current flowing through wire. If you plug Voltage meter parallel in circuit it has as large as possible resistance, to not influence measured voltage. Either "as small as possible" is not 0, nor "as large as possible" is not infinite. If they would be 0 and infinite, there would be no influence (and in fact we wouldn't be able to measure), but they are not.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.