s1eep

In this thread I will briefly describe how the heart effects, inter alia, thought and emotion. As the Egyptians transcribed 'the heart is the seat of all emotion, and with my modern day experience added, I can safely say that it is also the subconscious, and thus, the source of man's thought. When we think of a subject, it's by way of a prompt from the heart (~in the form of a "!") to the mind ("?"), whether this be by natural instinct or through the subliminal; nature or nurture. A thought-prompt is a signal sent by the heart, and it's not originally worded-- it takes mental power to word 'a real cat' for example. All hearts are connected, by way of them being hearts, call it a special relativity, and probably in other ways. How does a thought-prompt emerge? When hearts cross, instinct arises... And this is the primary reason the heart prompts the mind. If my body, naturally, begins to align with a cat's heart some moments before I think of it, then I will be prompted by my heart, and this prompt will likely turn into a thought; a soft proof of this fact is that when I have not experienced what a cat is, I will not think of it because I don't know it exists, and therefore our hearts cannot be aligned; however, a paternalistic hand can change this malleably. Worded thought is like an "iron sceptre" that we use to excite and manipulate our heart into omission of certain subjects; we can change our hearts course with spoken and acknowledged word. Take for example the word "rat", it rhymes with the word "cat", and if I'm caught in rhythm then I may think of cats because I was thinking of rats; this is but one example of how our hearts are manipulated by the word of the tongue in the mind. This means that my teacher may cause my heart to align with the cat's heart, and thus cause me to think of a cat; assimilation of a cat's heart is not a requirement since a my teacher or a teacher in the cycle of teaching, had assimilated it, so it's a silent passage through the subconscious. Think of the heart as an engine to the mind, all movements of a human, or cat, are coming from their heart, at the source, but movement is henceforth controlled by the mind; it's possible for the mind to follow the heart's command, and vice versa, for example, in situations where we are scared, we will instinctively try to pacify our emotions so that we become fearless again-- we are following the heart and it's output here, and not the mind. A metaphorical example; if I take my foot of the acceleration pad of a car, then I will still be in motion, and I'm left to keep control of the torque of the engine's prior output, that's unless, amongst other things, I choose to put my foot on the brake and come to a halt. The flow of nature makes it so there are lots of moments wherein we can follow our hearts, such as by meeting someone we like or someone that we don't, hunger or fear, whatever the case is, sometimes we submit to the pulse of emotion and follow the commands given by the heart. THIS IS MY OPINION! Written above is what had led me to this opinion...

Can you change my name to s13ep, rather than s1eep? Or direct me somewhere I can do this myself? Thanks in advance.

Yes. Looking back on ourselves, that seems like the right thing to say.

Yes, partially, but it's attributed to many things. Is the heart not unconscious to some extent? It's not where we experience our vision. Things like the Sun in the sky, how it appears, not only the Sun as the Sun and the sky and the sky.

Yes because I can relate the day and night to aspects of myself. The lightness of day and darkness of night seem so simple but with everything else, and further in depth, it's not so; I can relate this simplicity to things in myself, how they are experienced by myself and how they are divided in the same way. I can then add stars in the night sky... The list goes on, or does it?

I think the stars coming out and the cohesive experienced night on Earth, what we have evolved alongside, for well, billions of years, is influencing a feeling in itself, not grief, not feeling romantic, what the night-time is like on Earth. I include myself in the nature.

At night we are closer to disunity. The day is time for action and bonding with the world. It would be beneficent for a drug-addict to 'chase-the-night' in effort to quit; I think our emotions are influenced by day and night.

Game/Movie Soundtracks or just orchestral, and any type of music with, what is to be considered, an uplifting drop. I imagine if you listened to Sleepless - Ben Sage, a song which is quite rough in the beginning 1 minute or so, but when it gets to the uplifting parts, it will probably catch your mind, mind-catching instead of eye-catching if you know what I mean, you will be interested, and you can do things with what feels like less effort.

I guess I can agree once again that my words aren't written to the exact detail of which they should be, see, I categorize things like faith, trust (belief, energy, devotion) and other things together, and I guess it's I expect it in others to know what I meant, especially when I say 'faith' because that's something I associate with "putting in effort" or "energy toward something", the blood running through my veins, etc, I have very artistic representations for such things, why not? We have words for them, why can I not create a nice image instead of a word? I wouldn't expect you to say I can't, but I would expect you to say it's not science. These scientists that I refer to, employed the word; now, I'm doing something else, I'm employing something more artistic as a communication device, not orientated differently to everything else... A picture, a quick work of art in the imagination, whatever, not the word. If I try to communicate to you about this language, and that it may support my theories, it is probable you will either decline or I will be called a crackpot. This is another reason why I sense wrongness in their theories, it seems to be based more on a central technology that isn't as powerful as the human mind and heart, in my belief, and this is because I trust my observation of nature and what's evident---plus my own rationality, I wouldn't jump off a cliff for science, so I will make sure to make sure the process is orientated around my self. If we're being scientific about 'crackpot', then I will admit that I am wrong, and just say that most theories are not proven to be correct one-hundred percent; some 'crackpot theories' try to explain everything one-hundred percent?

I agree but I would also carry this on into academia where people don't always come out perfect, or optimally smart humans; I also carry this on to the small percentages that some theories are wrong, and sense this total 'wrongness', the quidditity (or 'whatness') of the modern scientific method and it's results, just the minor percentages in it all that don't add up, we can't confidently understand it all in this way, but we can put our faith in the usefulness of the word (technology) in combination with our intelligence, and that with the word we will be able to conquer this feat, because we are adept creatures. The word is essentially, metaphorically, a really good move that's in a game that we've learnt, and we're just obsessed with using it. It is good yeah, but I think it's not above our adept selves, and evolving nature. There are some educated 'crackpots'.

The only sound argument I can think of for afterlife, is completely redefining the concept, to after-my-life thinking-ahead, belief in the children of the future. As for my thoughts on life after death, I have artistic ways I like to imagine it, where we are born on Earth because all humans are part of the same species, and there's no reason a similar consciousness can't be in a different vessel and it's aware in the way that I was, it could be a different person all together, but I have faith we are all related and whole; I will become, him/her/it... I was him/her/it. This isn't really my belief, this is just art I like; if I had my choice, between heaven/hell and nothing at all, I would pick heaven/hell. Plus I can't prove it's not there so there's no use in hating it, it's just not to be discussed seriously.

I think aligning the majority with order alone is potentially going to cause suffering; for example, an African who is not as advanced and healthy because he may live in third-world Africa, and an Englishman, both have adopted a social system, scientific discovery and technological advancement; they both are aligned to order somewhat in character. This is bad for the African because there is a lot of chaos in nature and life can be very chaotic, knowing so much and focusing so much on order may lead to depression, which may have been avoided entirely if the Africans here didn't adopt a social system, technological advancement or the pursuit in scientific discovery, they may have found peace in living like the other animals. In the case of the well-off Englishman, this route may be helpful, but this still doesn't mean that one should treat chaos in nature as anything lesser than order.

If anyone is wondering what led me to come up with the things I've stated recently, then, I can only say by looking and communicating with others through imagery. There is a thread of mine in the lounge with a link to nearly all of imagery I've been looking at over the last few years (further in the link are links to prior collections), but displayed on the link are my recent collection of, by now, quite a few images, but if you try to harmonize with any piece and groups of imagery, and treat concepts that you would think, I would think, or I may think someone may think, or even what you think, as artistic only, and maybe even the belief that they are scientific as something you will devote to the art. Everyone who is in on the art gets good ideas from it, it's like the source of news for imagination. It will look good to you for a temporary period, if you manage to understand the word being said, which some people haven't so if go to check, and you don't I won't complain. It's really fun, and I'm really excited to tell people that it can be intellectual, or stimulate intellectual thoughts, either by reference to good ideas, or as the perfect counter to some argument---it's the 'bon apetite' of languages. And I'm not being egotistical, it's just the way I've self-promoted my other thread.

I apologize, and I'm not a hateful person and if you knew me you probably wouldn't take offence, I enjoy the serious word and judgemental words, but I really don't have any kind of dark mind, I'm not the type to go behind your back, or gang up on you.

At the moment, we are driving ourselves into chaos; I will admit, I watched Obama standing up against climate change, so people are not totally void of sense, but our technological reality, the very core of it, needs to change; we need to be more nature-orientated; and this is also relative to interaction with other things; as I said, going back on-topic, does our mind get prompted by things when we think of them, is the universe interactive, can we interact with everything because it's all part of the same universe? If so, which I'm not sure of or saying that you should believe in, then maybe we are prompted by the Earth when we think of it, which would be most of the time for most humans. There is some sort of connection to Earth, the whole thing progresses as one, we have theories of evolution, it seems evident since I am a human.

I'm truly not, there are a collection (I won't say majority I won't say minority) of others, however, in a lot of popular internet forums it's rare to see someone with similar dedication to support, or interested in learning about the ways you should support, and how to back them up, even with personality and character, But there are others, I don't see myself as the greatest, but I don't need friends to tell me when I'm doing something which is good, I know when I'm being good because I believe I have educated myself on how to be good; good in co-ordination with the beneficent objective I have set myself. I'm not saying this is going to be declared as good by you, but I'm possibly educated enough in this matter to say, if you have children and they have children and it carries on far into the future, your children will be effected, so I know it could be possibly effecting others and have some sort of paternalistic hand.

But I'm assured it's beneficent, what I believe in, a less human-orientated technology world, go ahead and stream out the technology if it's in support of the prosperity of Earth. I'm only going to be here for the rest of the day so I'm just going to throw one bit of wisdom at you... Think of it like we're betting on horses, I think the Earth is the best horse for humanity and it will take humanity further then travelling to and from any other planet could, and thus win the race.

Yes---we can imagine real concepts, that are imagination, simply by sensing them. EDIT: But my view has changed since the original post.

Well I mean to come across as firmly in support of the world, and ruthless in this belief. Be sure that I don't have hateful thoughts about you---hate, is not in the air. You throw the word 'crackpot' around, and expect people to be okay with it, now it's your turn to accept the same fate. I agree, I was being a bit aggressive, and I'm not setting a good example myself, I waste, and so on, but what makes me stand out from you, is that I have a genuinely beneficent for humanity and Earth cause.

I'm not as science-literate as you, and I was hoping that friendly co-operative discussion would lead to maybe someone more knowledgeable, making a nice addition, or making sense out of the chaos I wrote. If you follow my semantics but are given full freedom to change them to make sense, can you? If not, then, agreed, I will come back when I can explain it scientifically.

I am someone who is always learning... As I said before to you, now I am wiser since I have had time to think about the original post. I don't need to make any more points, if you don't understand, that's your weakness not mine, and why should I try to help you understand, so you can express your weaknesses again? Drag us both down? Further and further into the billions of individual words and statements which make the huge abstraction that is what, the majority of, scientists believe in, and are asking us to follow. It's impossible to make sense out of the copious amount of doctrine, and when you remember all the words said by scientists of today, it's not fond memories, all this "I don't understand", "You are a crackpot", "You are just chemical reactions". This just leaves us confused---the imagination you project is an ego-based "abstraction", that is impossible to rationalize with as the theory of everything (lots of theories put together to create one cohesive whole apparently), it doesn't work I'm afraid, you'll always revert back to the wordless things found through natural observation to 'make sense' out of living. Your projected imagination causes depression, anxiety, etc, because it's unwelcoming to opposite thoughts. The 'crackpot' with his head down who's still on the forums, is often saddened and tired because of your projected imagination. Children, are tired, becoming anxious when out and about or in their homes, because modern word and not imagery-based science is not possible to work out, the word they were educated to speak, and think, is forcing them to notice and feel the effects of the opposite side to their beliefs (i.e. hate). You don't think I notice myself thinking about all the imperfect things encircling my argument, that I thought about when I devised a certain theory, after I have encountered debate, you know, the opposing side to my beliefs. And my use of the word modern scientist in a negative way, is equal to scientists use of the word 'crackpot', so, please accept this formalized and precise, lesser-categorization, or I'll take a risk in admitting, it's can also be seen as an insult. This is not an attack on science, this is critique of modern scientists.

What's the epitome of 'doing', used by you as 'not much would get done'?

Well this isn't enough of a counter to mean anything... Hmmm. I will one day prove this (I strive to, anyway). Well, it seems as if the discussion isn't going anywhere, I will probably take my leave for another few months (if I don't get banned before then) after today. “I am enough of an artist to draw freely upon my imagination. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world.”― Albert Einstein