Leaderboard

You have no point. You have no American English. You are not communicating. It's all self-delusion, based on this single misinterpretation that you make no effort to correct but keep repeating, of a doctrine you do not understand and make no effort to understand, even when it is explained in the simplest possible terms. You have provided here no reason for anyone to waste any more time on you.

It's easy if you try... Personally, I am living because I enjoy living. If believing in God brings meaning to your life, that's great, just leave me out of it.

Who brings chocolate eggs that cause unconsciousness? The ether bunny.

Yes, it is safe to put the experiment on line. If the universe ends or something along those lines, I will personally take responsibility, so don't worry

The existence of an aether - I presume you mean the luminiferous kind - would imply a violation of Lorentz invariance, and thus also of CPT invariance. This has been extensively tested for to very high levels of accuracy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_searches_for_Lorentz_violation Based on the fact that all these experiments came out negative, I can pretty much guarantee you that whatever it is you have in mind will also come out negative. In all likelihood, your specific experiment has already been conducted in some form anyway. Your concerns are misplaced - these tests have all been done already, this isn’t a new thing.

Good points, but aren't we beyond the point where short term fixes to energy policies are adequate? We've seen over the last 40 years the malevolent influence of the fossil fuels lobby in derailing the climate debate. In recent years, they've been extending this influence to other aspects of government policy through the largely undisclosed funding of right wing 'think tanks' and pseudo-academic bodies around the globe, in order to further political aims that go way beyond merely increasing the dividend income for their shareholders. The parallels between their current malign political activities and those of Krupps and Thyssen in early 1930s Germany are striking. Given the social and strategic significance, one could now make a very strong case for putting the entire energy sector under state control via compulsory purchase. This would give future governments the opportunity to manage fiscal policy, social welfare, climate change and energy policy in a holistic manner plus remove a major agency of corruption in public life as a well-needed bonus.

Whether it is wise will be in the detail. Mostly the gas suppliers apart from Russia are not supplying less and are not producing less. Their costs may have risen marginally but their prices and profits have gone stratospheric. They won't willingly cut their prices down to mere very good profits, not even to prevent global economic disaster, even though perceptions of them as greedy and careless of consequences could conceivably harm their businesses over the longer term. As global recession could too. Some nations are taxing the super profits, ie have made the cause of rising prices the source of some funding for price interventions, but where the gas industry has the ears of policymakers and influence they appear capable of turning this sense of crisis into an opportunity for growth, with taxpayer money flowing to them, rather than away, irrespective of their current extreme profitability. They will fiercely resist price caps at producer level - mostly successfully. It will be power companies that purchase fuels off them at inflated prices (some being subsidiaries and not actually separate) that will be needing assistance to prevent the costs flowing through - which may come directly or indirectly from funding support for price differences at consumer level. I think we do need to see this as short term. Longer term will see greatly increased commitment to renewable energy and to the things that weren't done to make it constantly available... because gas was, we were assured, able to do it much cheaper and more reliably, which everyone except Greens supported. I expect that their failure to deliver that reliable supply at low cost - plus global warming concerns not going away will only make them more determined to reframe this fossil fuel energy crisis into a 'green' energy crisis. With an overflowing abundance of financial resources to put towards lobbying, PR, advertising, strategic donations, tactical lawfare, post politics payoffs etc.

Of course they would, but I'm not talking about their publicity department. They certainly invented Nylon and ICI held a licence for its manufacture in the UK. But after the war the Sherman Act cause bitterness and much litigation over this licence. Wikipedia will do https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyethylene_terephthalate#cite_note-9 There is a facebookmemories group you might be interested in for the now defunct ICI fibres. https://www.facebook.com/groups/332552444829415/ Perhaps there is one for Du Pont ?

He mentioned it: It did not sound very 'einsteinian' to me, so I tried to google if I could find a reference that Einstein really said something the like. I found exactly one reference... An article by a certain 'Solomon'... If somebody has still has some curiosity left, he can look up everything there. It is the usual crackpotism. Obviously not. And your reaction: I assume Studiot thought more about Marcel Grossmann and David Hilbert. Historians more or less agree that Mileva's role was mainly that of a highly intelligent 'resonance board'.

I only mentioned high voltage in regards to the plates . We need a source of high voltage that we can regulate what travels through the plates . I'm not an electrical engineer , obvious I couldn't do this on my own or do I know everything about electricity etc . AC could work using the plates like an element but then the direction of current might have affect creating a wormhole rather than a BH .

The nuerological reference frame , NRF for short , is a more advanced way of explaining the mind. The NRF is entangled with the universe when your eyes are open and is your conscious reference frame , making note of all we sense , storing information we gain .