Leaderboard

For any velocity the ball has along its trajectory, it has it for precisely 0 seconds, and for all but v_y = 0, it has said velocity twice for 0 seconds.

You've missed the whole point of the Constitution. The Senate is designed to give equal voice to each state-- which is (in some sense) a balancing of cultural differences, while the House of Representatives gives equal voice by population, which gives a balance by population. The whole purpose is to make it so that legislation is supported both by region/culture and population. What you are suggesting takes away that balance.

Good article in The Atlantic by Pete Wehner about Trump's disordered personality, and how we've got to stop being shocked by the disturbing things he says and does and start working to remove this damaged soul from an office he's completely unsuited for. He's only getting worse.

Mosquitos aren't attracted to the UV lamps in your typical lantern bug-zapper, which limits their effectiveness in that application. However, there are apparently ones that give off CO2, which does attract them https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bug_zapper "Mosquitoes are attracted to carbon dioxide and water vapor in the breath of mammals, not ultraviolet light.[6] However, there are now bug zappers that emit carbon dioxide or use an external bait, such as octenol, to better attract biting insects into the light."

Well it will definitely be something that will be difficult for the MWI interpretation to deal with. MWI doesn't deal well with probability density functions. For one thing then Aharonov Bohm effect was in strong contention as to whether [math]A_\mu[/math] was strictly a mathematical object without any physical effect. This paper shows otherwise.

No. Not everything is subject to human validation, and even if we do validate it, it is colored by a human's imperfect, limited, and biased view of the universe. Is a virus alive or is it not?

Science and logic are inseparable, and thinking without logic is chaotic. This is why I have seen some people here that the arguments are confusing and difficult to understand. Logical methods are not only able to reason, but also to prove, but logic must have a theoretical basis. But many people ignore logic. The article has analyzed that the evolution of human (survival ability) relies on innovation, and human survival cannot leave innovation. Even if it is reality, but there are still people who disagree. They believe that human evolution has nothing to do with human innovation. In fact prove this is very simple, as long as he does not relay human innovation, I can say that his viability is immediately becomes zero.

Your answer is very interesting. Since it is the science of uncertainty, what should we talk about? There can be no conclusion. All people need to do is stick to their will.

This is a strong expression of willingness.

I will sell, anyone formula of, time of time, for 50 000$, if u know about time of time u will interesting, if u dont understand then, u will think about me like a crazy, but i can say u only tS = n/k * x * tU, after it start theory, for implementation it u need 100 000 $, but if u implementation, it will be new era in science. KZ30722C000016394169.