Leaderboard

If God created the universe then he and his minions (angels) are obviously not an integral part of the universe. In other words they would not be governed by the laws of physics. So trying to use physics to describe the movement of angels is a waste of time.

If photons took 2 Earth's days to reach the Earth, they started travel at d = c * t = 299792458 m/s * 2 * 24 * 3600s = 51,804,136,742,400 m = ~ 51800 millions km = ~51.8 billions km away from the Earth.. Each planet have different meaning/length of "day". Prediction, observation and measurement of speed of light being finite, predates Einstein by centuries. Jupiter and Saturn have moons, which orbit around them. If you make measurements when the Earth is the closest to Jupiter or Saturn, and repeat measurement half-year later when Earth is on the opposite side of orbit, and the farthest from them, there is visible difference in delay that early astronomers noticed. In the case of Jupiter ~16 minutes. Why? Because the Earth is 300 millions kilometers away (in frame of reference of Solar System). Conclusion of astronomers: speed of light must be finite!

In one day, as measured by the traveler, he will have traveled about 22.3 Light days as measured by the Earth. This is about 1/70 the distance to the nearest star or 3863 times the distance of the Earth from the Sun. Length contraction does not directly alter this result, As far as the Earth is concerned, the length contraction of the ship does not alter either the distance traveled by the ship of the time it takes to travel the distance. From the perspective of the space traveler, length contraction shrinks that 22.3 light days down to just under 2 light days, and he doesn't measure any time dilation. Thus according to him he traveled traveled just short of 2 light days in 2 days, traveling at 99.9% of c. * * though to be technically correct, from his perspective, it is the Earth that traveled that 2 light days in two days.

! Moderator Note Sorry, no, not good enough.

In which case one could film it and post it as porn. The circle is now complete

! Moderator Note Thread closed.

so, just a troll...

Does space evolving? - Yes, everything diverge. Space expands. As we currently understand started from an infinitly small point and evolved to its current size. Does time evolving? - I would say so. You can not go back to the past, Nothing will be younger. I would say that time is evolving and present a linear development since the beginning of time. If I understood it right we count it since the big bang. It evolved to 13.8 billion years as the age of our Universe Does information evolving? Yes I think so. At the beginning there were information was about the properties of space, time, energy, matter. Now after 13.8 billion years later information is about complex biological systems with conscience and other metaphysical properies. I would say that information evolved. Does energy and matter evolving? Slippery question. If the other 3 is evolving why this 2 would not evolve? I was thinking if it is true that we have a gravitational constand and this constant is existing in expanding space doesn´t that mean that the amount of energy/matter in the system has to increase to maintain a stabil gravitational constant? Does this gravitational constant the same as it was 13.8 billion years ago? Can we measure any changes in this gravitational constant?

I watched my toaster very closely this morning, imagine my disappointment when it failed to fly.

I always can prove (physically too) that 1*0=1 How can one correct the math if it is suspected to be wrong? How a mathematical theory is prooven? Re-check it's validity in Nature(physics)?

Does Time Really Exist? I know all physics and chemistry regardless of what you think . You cant just understand me because you are stuck with your math or you dont want to understand .

I wont do any of those thing because they are silly.

Im not a professional scientist or physicist I only got my network and that's no evidence I can show, but if you think that the universe is made of pourous water you will have more easy understanding everything. By the way the early hot is electricity, and the dense is water. Also the simple complexity of Hydrogen and Oxygen should by logic reveal that we are talking about the beginning.

Without making direct references to my design with tangible explanations this is just an empty statement

Was this you showing me my error in my calculations or you showing your lack of understanding of physics? See this is what it looks like when you actually reference something someone said and ask for an explanation on it.