Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/22/19 in all areas

  1. Comment not needed... The article is here. Do not forget to follow this link (from the article) for the zoomable version. What are all these ring structures? I thought planetary nebulae do not exist that long, so to see so many seems impossible. But what else are they?
    2 points
  2. Always try to keep sexual fluidity contained with condoms or dams. They are a medium for STDs. Oh, that isn't the intended meaning ?
    1 point
  3. People have faith because they believe in something unproven, not a problem; until the politicians see a way to exploit it.
    1 point
  4. Reduction of what? Blocking or shielding what? From what? What conditions? Why would they be subjective limitations? You mean "overcome" not "over come". How does "recognition and response" overcome the conditions? What "response" are you suggesting? What do you mean by "direction"? How on earth can you use "dimension" as a synonym for "direction"? Are they? What evidence do you have for that? What do you mean by "biological identity"? What do you mean by "integrity"? How do "direction and purpose" relate to "integrity"? What is "it"? In other words, "much of what's condition"? And how does it affect response? ("Response should not have a capital R). This is very unclear. Is "conditions" acting as a verb here? It and "response" should not have capital letters; it makes them look ;ike proper nouns and makes the sentence unparsable. What "secondary conditioned response"? (Neither "faith" nor "religious" should have capital letters.) What evidence do you have that that "faith blocks secondary conditioned response"? What on Earth has any of this got to do with the multiverse. That is just crazy. In short, most of your sentences make no sense. Those that might have some meaning appear to be just unsupported assertions.
    1 point
  5. ! Moderator Note No model, no testable predictions, no support, despite multiple requests. IOW, closed. Don't bring this topic up again.
    1 point
  6. More precisely, it’s from a reconstruction of the environment, after the fact
    1 point
  7. ! Moderator Note Since the OP appears impervious to reason and genuine scientific rebuttal, this thread is closed.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.