Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/31/19 in all areas

  1. Why did you reject mainstream science? You could have had a first class science education in less than half that time, and it would have given you all the basics you'd need understand the things you think are wrong, PLUS you'd have the kind of advanced training that would truly let you approach science at the level you think you are now.
    1 point
  2. Welcome to speculations, where one may also boldly go where no man has gone before. But please provide some kind of model and math describing what you want to discuss. My version of the universal translator seems incapable of translating the post to Federation Standard English.
    1 point
  3. Did you guys all forget that this is a discussion forum? The OP starts a thread on a forum, by definition, because they want to discuss something. Then OP in a matter of a very short time says (paraphrasing) "well, actually I can't discuss it". So... if there isn't anything to discuss, why are we surprised that the thread was closed? There is little need to document everyone asking questions and providing critiques that OP has stated they cannot or will not answer. Thread closure is the logical next step; if there is to be no discussion, then there is no point on a discussion forum.
    1 point
  4. The simplest way would be in my opinion asking this guy to tell you what he's talking about.
    1 point
  5. Not sure what the paper is about. But any reversible process may be represented as a group; and every group may be represented as a group of permutations. That's the famous Cayley's theorem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley's_theorem
    1 point
  6. (Emphasis added) Isn't that a huge part of he problem? If you are in an area where there isn't a lot of income, then your community doesn't have money to pay for education, which perpetuates the problem of poverty. OTOH, if you think that access to a basic education is or should be a right, then it is.
    1 point
  7. Divisiveness is so great because we’ve evolved along the ape line of primates. We’re tribal monkeys. I appreciate where you’re coming from and see the inherent ethics of expecting these things from presidential candidates. I also see, however, a rapidly shifting global landscape wherein tribes are no longer separated by oceans or arbitrary cartographical boundaries. We’re connect in ways never previously possible, and those connections are algorithmacally magnified and shaped. We’re mostly hairless apes being led around by the nose; marionettes ties to strings held by AI puppeteers. Perhaps having a few “pied pipers” leading us toward something more positive, communal, and even foundational is a good thing. Perhaps it’s what the times call for. Sure, we rationalize our decisions after the fact... come up with clever narratives for why we did X, Y, and Z, but it’s our passion that pulls the vote lever and checks the box on the ballet. It’s our bellies that decide. Maybe having aspiration and vision as core to the message is exactly what we need in a leader. Maybe the mythology is more central in voters hearts... maybe pathos overrules logos... and maybe that passion should be focused on positive active causes that actually matter in everyone’s daily lives. You know, or maybe we should set arbitrary expectations for how a candidate should behave. I suppose that’s an option, too.
    1 point
  8. Short of it I have used different languages to decipher information from the first 15 decimals of Pi Here: The languages are Romain Numerals numbers and the Romanian word for 10. I did not create a special language Just used existing languages. I proposed back in 2014-2016 I proposed that if I were a time traveler I would leave a message using pi but change everything around it to make the message and that is what I present. Below is another message found in pi and 2pi or Tau insisting an Ai is watching over us. Looking at the facts everything is out of order unless it was created into this reality. Speed of light in m/s recommended values of 299792458 in 1975 Decimal to ascii was not invented until 1963 Artificial Intelligence coined in 1955 Decimals of pi did not reach 500 till 1874 Great seal was not finalized until 1782 Indipendence day 7/4/1776 Pyramids were built -2500
    -1 points
  9. I have realy a question do you joking me? Its absoluetly easy to understand and every good article that i have wrote was closed. It comes mote tomrs for me like a conspuracy about good and correct science. It gives so much bullshit articles and my was everytine closed and much from the team says everytime that all was wrong. I have worked 13 years for the anwser and you destroy it me with a wrong anwser, that looks like a conspiracy about correct physics and science. Im sorry but what language are you speaking i can translate it with my own words but it was easier for me with the google translator and i understand it too in the translated english. Sorry but english is the main language of the world.
    -1 points
  10. And what will it be? The answer is nothing. Here to the explanation ... A saying of mine was that if gravity is an "element" that consists of all the elements, then it must be something that is made of everything. For the most part, atoms are nothing. For the most part, the universe is nothing. So empty vacuum. This may not suit some because of the dark matter but here is another explanation ... Everything that is in motion can only be put into that state by turning. Joints, motors, wheels, turbines, planets, suns, galaxies, pumps, as well as the lungs and heart have a few degrees of rotation in the walls. Well gravitation is also a force that moves things, such as Without them we would not have a day or a night. Calculated back, so must the crucial clue how gravity works by turning happen. There is again only one answer. Nothing. What do we have when everything moves outward in the middle? Nothing. However, that would stop at a certain point, because nothing in the middle keeps everything from moving further out. Physically, this is called a vacuum. In a centrifuge there would also be a vacuum in the middle. Well CERN did not look for anything, only nothing. If you want to know more, check out the example of a diagram by Edmond Halley on Wikipedia, but that goes into the field of conspiracy theory. You can also align atoms by vacuum which you can test with 300-400 €. Video from the experiment is the same and no it is not the moving sheet, which I have tested ..... And what if not everything turns? We would not be there, everything would disappear in all directions. Here is the video ... What I still consider speculative, what I wrote in a previous article with the perfect reactor, is that every atom has its own frequency. What would be possible to produce gold magnets, waiting for the explanation. So predominantly by the, let's call force field and not magnetic field, the earth iron aligned, I would bet on it has to do with the Schumann Resonanz. Speculatively, one would have to be able to magnetize gold by a normal vacuum which only sucks particles so that it also attracts gold. I suspect that I have not thought 100% that you have to generate a different frequency field in the vicinity of the tube and the glued on there gold sheet so that the gold atoms can be aligned. That would have to go with any other material as long as you know the frequency. With lead, it would be conceivable to generate a magnetic field which shields gamma radiation. If you can atomise the atoms for alignment and thus also for the generation of a lead magnetic field. There are many other things possible. Oh PS a black hole is then a vacuum which not only absorbs particle but also radiation. For this I already have a solution, as everyone knows, power always goes the shortest way and around a current-carrying conductor rotates a magnetic field. What if you take a tube and connect it from all sides, at both ends with cables that are all exactly the same length and all need exactly the same way for the current? Then a magnetic field would have to rotate around the tube and, in the interior, create a suction for radiation, assuming corresponding energies. By the way, you would have a time machine. Welcome to Star Trek. Particles vacuum nice and good but does anyone speak of a blasting vacuum?
    -1 points
  11. hi, There are two mistakes in Newton's universal gravity. The gravity of the universe and the earth is different. Mass does not produce gravity. If you need further consideration, let's do it later.And let's explain how mass is born. Substances are made of atoms. Neutrons decay into protons and electrons in 15 minutes. Thus, an atom consists of protons and electrons.When a force is applied to the proton, a magnetic field is generated behind. The magnetic field is a resistance that tries to pull the protons.This is an electromagnetic mass.The electromagnetic mass is the mass itself. Earth's gravity causes an electric field on one side when Schumann resonance is applied to matter. The Schumann resonance is applied to all matter on the ground. It is difficult to shield. The gravity of space is the Coulomb force by the charge of the plasma that each planet has. The planets do not collide because they have repulsive force to each other. If you are seeking the wrong definition of modern physics, please forget this answer. If you are curious about nature, I will write more detailed answers.
    -4 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.