Leaderboard

No it is not: "Dietary exposure to aluminum (usually as the citrate) results in small amounts of aluminum being absorbed from the gut (<1%) and reaching the bloodstream [4]. Following enteral absorption, aluminum is transported mainly in the plasma in association with the iron-binding protein transferrin [8]. Aluminum is distributed well throughout the body with the skeleton and lungs (due to inhalation exposures) containing the highest mass of aluminum (approximately 50% and 25% of the body burden, respectively). As for many divalent and polyvalent metals,the skeleton can be a longterm storage depot for aluminum, with the half-life of aluminum in bone being on the order of years [5]. It is anticipated that bone will serve as a stable depot for aluminum in infants, as well as adults, due to the increase in bone mass and volume that takes place during an infant’s rapid growth and development. With regard to the non-skeletal compartment, the half-life of aluminum in soft tissues such as the liver is short (<2 days), which indicates very little accumulation in these organs. The majority of bioavailable aluminum is excreted shortly after exposure, primarily in the urine [5], and there appears to be little difference in the renal clearance of aluminum in infants and adults at low exposures [9]. Although aluminum accumulates in the brain as well as bone over time, the concentration of aluminum in brain is lower than that in many other tissues of the body (e.g., liver, spleen), and only 1% of whole-body aluminum is present in the brain or central nervous system at any given time [8,5]" "Assuming slow release of aluminum adjuvant from the site of injection into the systemic circulation, we have demonstrated that aluminum levels in infants are well below the minimal risk level curves for either median or low-birth weight babies. We also compared the body burden of aluminum contributed by vaccines with that contributed by diet. The body burden of aluminum from vaccines is not more than 2-fold higher than that received in the diet. While the contribution of vaccines to an infant’s aluminum body burden can be slightly higher than that of the dietary contribution in our model, the fact that the primary pool where the aluminum is residing, as a long-term storage depot, is likely to be skeletal and not a more sensitive soft organ system is reassuring [5]. Although aluminum toxicosis is known to occur in humans, it is found exclusively in individuals suffering from kidney disease or in those exposed to high levels of aluminum via occupational inhalation" Source: http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/FDA-aluminum-paper.pdf I'm not even going to comment on this nonsense, I have too much respect for this site and I don't want to go off topic any further.

Do you understand that the high levels of aluminium may be because of the autism, rather than the other way round? Also, let's have a look at this OK, a typical brain is about 1.4 Kg Of which, according to this https://water.usgs.gov/edu/propertyyou.html about 73% is water So it's 17% "dry weight"- whatever that may be. That's 378g of "stuff". It's mainly from the frontal lobes (Have a look at the data here https://www.quora.com/Neuroanatomy-How-much-do-the-various-parts-of-the-brain-weigh-on-average-or-approximately-what-proportion-of-the-brain-is-each-part if you don't believe me). They average about 2.3 µg/g So that's 870µg of aluminium in the brain. But a typical vaccine only contains 125µg So, unless every last drop of aluminium in a vaccine is transferred to the brain, it figures that MOST OF THE ALUMINIUM IN THE BRAIN IS FROM SOME OTHER SOURCE; THERE JUST ISN'T ENOUGH IN THE VACCINES. Also, you seem to have ignored the important bit of what I posted. Do you remember that you said "The decline in infectious diseases began before the mass use of vaccines and was rather due to the improved nutrition and sanitation. " and I pointed out that If that was true then stopping vaccinations wouldn't lead to an increase in the incidence of- and harm from- measles. But it has. When reality does not agree with your ideas, it is not because reality has got it wrong. Well, you need to address that. Good luck.

You just have to heat it to high enough temperature..

If at it's surface it was suddenly at almost lightspeed, for some unexplainable reason, and physical reality immediately came back into play, I think it would become a Black Hole of finite mass, with the mass depending on how close to lightspeed that "almost lightspeed" was. Some of the known Universe should escape, due to the Expansion and time required for any effect to reach the distant known Universe.

For a single photon any discussion of beam divergence is meaningless. A single photon neither diverges nor converges. It goes where it goes. There are, however, some multi slit / diffraction experiments where the photon appears to pass through more than one point (slit), or not, depending upon how the experiment is conducted. The only laser beam divergences I have looked at closely are alignment lasers. Their beams neither diverge nor converge, but vary in width (diameter) in about a 20: 1 ratio from max to min and back again ,almost in a standing wave type configuration.

Here you are: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/grammar/countable-nouns This is oxforddictionaries, is that authentic enough for you?

Unlike you, I didn't ask for feedback...

Maybe it has some answers, but not all? Maybe not all scientists agree all the time on all points? Maybe you still have to figure out what scientists know, and you think you know too, but it's far from the truth? Buzz off. Did I spell that right for you?

It makes it clear that you are more interested in an "ideology" than in science.

I think it's laughable. I know gay people who are fat and gay people who are thin. I know gay people who are nervous, and gay people who are ebullient. And the same is true of straight people. Ditto vegetarians, vegans etc. The data just doesn't fit the hypothesis. The only interesting question left is, why are you so obsessed with homosexuality that you dream up (and write about and post) this ridiculous idea in spite of the obvious faults in it?

What advantages.. ? Trigonometric functions are extremely slow to calculate (by CPU/FPU)... sqrt(x) is just generalization of power of x^0.5 cube root(x) is just generalization of power of x^0.3333333(3) ps. Make function that is calculating something faster than currently existing methods, and you will have attention from scientific community, and more importantly from computer designer community (faster operation is always welcome by programmers and users of applications). You need to benchmark currently existing methods and you own method to verify your method is faster than native, and alternative implementations.

Yes I wish they woulkd have invested some of the North Sea revenues in many more reservoirs like the pumped storage Dinorwig (Wales) and Cruachan (Scotland) But that would have been too far sighted for our governments. Most dams have a hydrogeneration facility at least for the water supplier's own use.

Are you aware of the difference between a tide which is the periodic vertical movement of water due to the Moon ( and other) gravities and a tidal stream which is the associated periodic horizontal movement of water which must take place if the water surface moves up and down. One difference is that using the tide means impounding water behind expensive barrages as the tide spends long time periods not changing much in level, Whilst a tidal stream is always flowing back or fore. Better a tidal stream generator does not need any head behind it, the water naturally flows through the turbine. Nor does it offer obstruction to navigation since it just sits on the bottom. The bank, StudioT uses financed the world's first such generator at the entrance to Strangford Loch in Ireland. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaGen Other advantages are that you can add horizontal generators one at a time and they start producing revenue the moment after installation With tide generators you have to put in expensive infrastructure first (the barrage) and you don't get any money back until that is finished. Here is another comment. The UK has large areas of the Atlantic, Irish and North seas within its coastal waters. It also has a large and increasing number of expensive to decommission redundant oil rigs. If our pusilanimous government were to designate a suitable parking area for redundant oil rigs they could be parked in a row and have wind or current generators mounted on or under them. This make further use of them, out of the way. A further benefit would be that it is expensive to lay lots of cables to bring the generated energy ashore. Such a parking area could need only a single connection.

Very much agreed. Give yourself a cookie. You did say all that. Not the point. What in that in any way refutes my post you just quoted? Let me repeat: In reply to "As far as I'm aware, if you're convicted of breaking the laws, you're jailed and removed from office." (which you were quoting from Raider) You repied: "No, if members of ones campaign breaks the law they are not removed from office." Then you gave Trump as an example. Go back and read it all. It should be pretty clear. You need to keep better track of when you twist things...or better yet...stop doing it.

Why do you think that doing tangent and arc sinus, will be faster than other, already present, methods... ? The methods to calculate square root, you can find on this website: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_computing_square_roots Your equations are missing parenthesis.. everywhere.. After entering your above equation to calculator, or wolfram alpha, we see result: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=tan(asin(+2+%2F+(2+%2B+0.5+*+10^-36+))+%2F+10^18) 1.570796326794896618524215... × 10^-18 After adding missing parenthesis: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=tan(asin(+2+%2F+(2+%2B+0.5+*+10^-36+)))+%2F+10^18 1.41421

I thought saucers were for the ion lift type drives... maybe I'm wrong. What is the proposed drive mechanism again? - Surely not that thing in the vid, lol. It certainly isn't going to power a saucer to fly... and I am not sure WHO would consider that contraption in the vid an 'antigravity' device.

Hello @MasterOgon. Is something missing from the description? I've highlighted two statements; they seem to contradict each other? (emphasis by me) How does this work in the vacuum of space?

Some of this is surely because it’s been turned into a reality tv show by a reality tv star. Survivor and the Kardashians have always been more popular than C-Span and NPR and ratings drive news cycles

Here, we agree. But here your position is confusing. We know Russia actively worked to elect Trump. You seem to be saying Clinton colluded with them in these efforts, efforts intended to defeat her. You’re saying she actively worked to secure her own defeat. You then claim that the evidence of this is how her team paid a US company to do opposition research, and that company hired a British fellow, and that British fellow got some information from people who were from Russia, and those Russian folks suggested our current president was videotaped while prostitutes peed on him. That’s your evidence of this. Even if your point that Clinton sought to undermine democracy itself due to her fury over Trumps push for her deleted emails (which strains credulity, but I’ll stipulate it), the evidence you cite in no way supports or begins to scale with this claim. Your position is confusing, but more than that it’s defective.

Because we have moved on in the last 350 years. Learn to spell philosophical (or get a browser that corrects it for you).

I have enabled the public profile at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mones_Jaafar If the link do not work properly let me know No jargon please just your scientific opinion. I have made updates and clarifications and restored the parenthesis notation according to norm that do not have any influence or change on the formulas according to the scientific context.