Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. MigL

    Impeachment Hearings

    Thanks JC. And +1; that's the nicest thing anyone has said about me in a while. I don't know much about H Biden, but wasn't he appointed to the board of AMTRAK by G W Bush ? He is a layer and a lobbyist. And while lobbyists trade political favors, that is a problem with the system that needs to be addressed. For all we know Hunter himself, may be very capable
  3. Today
  4. iNow

    Impeachment Hearings

    I’m confused. Everything I’ve shared is already in the public domain. Which of my comments do you feel is of questionable validity?
  5. What you claim to be facts are in dispute; However, if they are true they should certainly come out during the impeachment inquiry. If evidence for them does not come out clearly and definitively...you really can't claim them as facts.
  6. Well, a rotating magnetic field is very useful.
  7. iNow

    Impeachment Hearings

    Because it looks bad, exactly as they said. Suspicion, however, carries with it a suggestion of broken laws, not just stupidity or questionable decision making. The connotation is that corruption was involved, not just poor judgment. Your quotes spoke of political optics, not legal suspicion. It had already been investigated. Even Trumps own team said nothing was wrong there. And... Even if he wanted it investigated, he needed to defer it to others who were uninvolved (but we all know how he feels about people who do the right thing by recusing themselves... see also: Jeff Sessions) . He didn’t want an investigation. He couldn’t care less about corruption unless he’s trying to hide his own. No... He wanted a public announcement on CNN from a foreign leader that Biden was being investigated. I've already shared these facts with you previously in this thread. I know you’re merely trying to represent Trumps position accurately even though you don’t necessarily agree with it, but continuing to ignore these facts and acting as if they're irrelevant makes your representation of his position is a bit too on the nose for my taste.
  8. You act like I'm accusing the Bidens of corruption. I did not. I said it was obviously suspicious. (it is) On my original point, I said Trump's defence (not in his defence) is that he, Trump, saw it as suspicious. That is sufficient for him to ask that it be investigated. Other evidence may clear Hunter Biden, or be inconclusive, but that doesn't change the fact that H. Bidens position in Ukraine is suspicious, or was to Trump at the time of the Zelensky call. Why do you think Yang, Gabbard, and Sanders made the comments they did?
  9. iNow

    Impeachment Hearings

    What does this even mean, and why do you think that about me?
  10. You don't find it suspicious, and furthermore, don't understand how others would see it that way? See the quotes from Yang "It certainly has a bad look to it" and Gabbard: “I think the perception is certainly a concern,” Heres Sanders reserving judgement: “I know I’m a little bit old-fashioned. I like to see the evidence before I talk about things. I read the papers and I read what I read... but I don’t know that I know enough at this point to make any definitive statement.” https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/bernie-wont-rule-out-questioning-hunter-biden-83411 I think you are conflating suspicious with certainty.
  11. iNow

    Impeachment Hearings

    I didn’t. Ah. Yes. A video of Biden directly supporting US policy toward the country in partnership with EU allies to INCREASE inspections on the company where his son worked. You’re right. That’s EXACTLY the same as extorting a country to investigate a political ally for personal gain. So glad you shared. I’m trying to follow your argument, but I also am unsure what you think is suspicious here. I’ve read the quote from mistermack you’ve now posted 3x and still think you’re conflating suspicious with dumb
  12. Yesterday
  13. In your shoes I might take it in to a professional. Last month I knocked over my tower and the lights went out. I had to wait over the weekend but it just boiled down to resticking some part down again (cost 70 €). Mind you the WiFi is bust since then but I manage without... I hope you get the better of it,though. Computers can suck the life from you
  14. Already covered that. Your point is fine. That's why (in part) it falls into the category of suspicious and not indisputably corrupt. It's still suspicious, and still obviously. If you would like a political reference... Yang hasn't condemned the Bidens, but believes much of this type of thing should end. "it certainly has a bad look to it" https://www.inquisitr.com/5662296/andrew-yang-biden-ukraine/ https://www.yang2020.com/policies/prevent-regulatory-capture-and-corruption/ Another Democrat candidates take: Co-host Saagar Enjeti also noted Friday that many Democratic presidential candidates “have been very reluctant to call this out as evidence of corruption” and asked Gabbard if the allegations against Joe Biden indicate corruption.“I think the perception is certainly a concern,” Gabbard said. “I think we have to look at how we can root out the corruption of the abuse of power and influence within our government, and I think that there’s a lot of examples of it.” https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/tulsi-blasts-biden-ukraine-allegations-87996 I still think Mistermack's is the best! "It's stating the bleedin obvious really. Nobody in their right mind could believe his daddy's position had nothing to do with it."
  15. Of course his dad’s position had something to do with it. I asked how it was suspicious. Putting people with a “name” on corporate boards happens all the time.
  16. If only they'd say that about Ivanka and Don Jr. they might garner some credibility, but no. They'd rather stick to the double standard. The Biden story is an excuse. A straw to be grasped for the execution of criminal acts after the fact. The guilty dog barks first. Trumps lies are in fact, admissions of his own misdeeds.
  17. Defrag is a continuous background process in W10 so all you get is a notice saying the disk does not need defframenting.(or so MS says) I did run checkdisk between one pair of reboots, but it 'found no problems' I plan to run windows system checker next, but that should take a while.
  18. I think Mistermack put it quite eloquently:
  19. Sorry, what? Please explain what was suspicious, before proceeding as if this was a given.
  20. I read what you write. You get your digs in at every turn. Even in this bullshit apology, which is just your way equivocating around inferring I'm crazy. It was intentional and you're still doing it. Then you prove my point by spinning it back to the Democrats at the end. Say anything to avoid the substance, is all you got.
  21. I'm sorry if I in any way assisted in getting you confused or questioning your own sanity. I assure you it was unintentional. I think you can avoid this by concentrating on what is written instead of what you think I might "really mean". ...and you see none of this with the Democrats?
  22. It's stating the bleedin obvious really. Nobody in their right mind could believe his daddy's position had nothing to do with it. Proving it is another matter, you can be sure that the Bidens got the story straight, before they ran the scam. What Trump wanted was the investigation. The result didn't really matter as long as the mud sticks. I can't see the US floating voter buying the story that Hunter Biden was some sort of hot shot whose words of wisdom were worth millions to Ukrainians, with his daddy being vice president just being a coincidental detail. So long as Trump doesn't actually get kicked out, he'll probably come out ahead.
  23. To end the Watergate scandal. it was the Republicans who ousted Nixon. No such introspect occurs in today's Republican caucus. They've chosen the scorched earth tactic instead. Burn down every institution in the democracy to hop into bed with dictators and enemies. It's disgraceful and shameful what they're doing to career diplomats, who are merely doing their jobs and reporting the facts based upon their observations. But no, Republicans gotta fabricate dirt where none exists, no less while Ivanka and Don Jr. are flagrantly doing what they've erroneously accused Hunter Biden of having done.
  24. Do you have defrag on Win10? I wonder if that might be of any use if the size of available HD is being misreported.
  25. There is a quote from Tesla that’s very interesting.”my greatest discovery was the rotating electromagnetic field”.
  26. Yes that is the only way to get it to work ATM. Had to do it again tonight and haven't had the time to work on it today (or tomorrow). Last night did this, spent 1/2 hour on Skype no bother. But had to use the power button to turn the bl___y thing off. Turned it on for the first time tonight and again killed it after 10+ minutes where it hadn't fully populated the desktop. So booted to safe mode once then restart to normal mode and Skype etc again OK. But I expect it to not work the next time I try to boot unless I force safemode first. As regards the HD File manager reports plenty of space on it as originally noted. Thanks for your thoughts
  27. everyone has double standards rangerx whether it be trump and wiki leaks or this:
  28. You inferred, then denied the inference. It's called gaslighting. Conservatives loose their shit whenever there's a remote possibility someone might have breached constitutional or national security issues, but when they do it themselves, it's a nothing burger or a so what. The major thing worse than the allegations against the American president are the Republican's double standards floundering around them.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.