Jump to content

Bufofrog

Senior Members
  • Posts

    1859
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Bufofrog last won the day on February 22

Bufofrog had the most liked content!

4 Followers

About Bufofrog

  • Birthday 07/13/1955

Profile Information

  • Location
    Upstate NY
  • College Major/Degree
    chemical Engineering
  • Favorite Area of Science
    Engineering / Physics
  • Occupation
    Retired Process Engineer

Recent Profile Visitors

6181 profile views

Bufofrog's Achievements

Primate

Primate (9/13)

386

Reputation

  1. The whole point of the light clock is that the speed of light doesn't change. You don't seem to have much of an understanding of relativity. You should listen to the people on this forum, you will learn a lot.
  2. First you should actually print on the pictures the figure number so it isn't so difficult to try to determine which figure you are talking about. Secondly I didn't see any algebra in your post to comment on.
  3. As exchemist said it won't work so building it is a waste of time. The goesouts can't be more than the goesins, that is just a fact of life.
  4. I think the answer is a resounding yes. Mammals have been around for 200 million years and birds have been around for 150 million years. Sounds like it's working out just fine.
  5. Oh thank god, you had all our scientific dogma was circling the drain...
  6. I have no idea what that means and I'm pretty sure I don't I want you to clarify it for me..
  7. This is where learning about the actual evidence and not relying on your 'hunches' is a good idea.
  8. This is just numerology. In other words this is just seeing patterns where none actually exists.
  9. I also suggest that you should discuss this issue with a medical professional.
  10. It seems like the whole disproving relativity thing is going to be a rather large obstacle.
  11. I guess it's fun to fantasize that you have come up with some new physics.
  12. I bet you a dollar this will not be "considered the new frontier in physics". Oh I see this is just an advertisement for your book. No thanks.
  13. Regardless of the efficiency of the turbine, you will have a lot of loss of efficiency by running an entire hydraulic system. It is cheaper and more efficient to just use the engine power directly to turn the wheels.
  14. Looks like the thing would work in principle. However it seems to me that it would be much less efficient than using the pistons to directly rotate a shaft.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.