Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
hawksmere's Profile
Reputation: 0
Neutral
- Group:
- Senior Members
- Active Posts:
- 40 (0.11 per day)
- Most Active In:
- Physics (31 posts)
- Joined:
- 25-May 11
- Profile Views:
- 2,104
- Last Active:
Apr 27, 2012 - Currently:
- Offline
My Information
- Member Title:
- Quark
- Age:
- Age Unknown
- Birthday:
- Birthday Unknown
- Gender:
-
Not Telling
- Favorite Area of Science:
- Astronomy
Contact Information
- E-mail:
- Click here to e-mail me
hawksmere
If one was on a plane, which was travelling at say 700 m.p.h and walked from the back of the plane to the first at say 3 m.p.h are they then travelling at 703 m.p.h??
May 25, 2011
LiquidMentality
May 25, 2011
May 25, 2011
Correct, relative to the ground, you would be travelling at 703 mph. However, relative to the plane, you would be travelling at only 3 mph.
hawksmere
May 25, 2011
May 25, 2011
so if in a super space shuttle travelling at the speed of light, relative to the universe, not the vehicle. would the person be travelling quicker then the speed of light?
ajb
May 25, 2011
May 25, 2011
You cannot simply add velocities in truth. When the speeds are near the speed of light you need to use the relativistic addition formula. The astronaut will always be measured to be travelling <c by any inertial observer.
Friends
hawksmere hasn't added any friends yet.

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!
Find My Content
Display name history
This status update has reached the maximum number of replies allowed
Comments
hawksmere has no profile comments yet. Why not say hello?