Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
insane_alien's Profile
Reputation: 801
Glorious Leader
- Group:
- Senior Members
- Active Posts:
- 10,369 (4.06 per day)
- Most Active In:
- Speculations (1297 posts)
- Joined:
- 27-May 05
- Profile Views:
- 12,381
- Last Active:
Yesterday, 08:06 PM- Currently:
- Offline
My Information
- Member Title:
- Genius
- Age:
- 24 years old
- Birthday:
- December 17, 1987
- Gender:
-
Male
- Location:
- Scotland
- Interests:
- oh just about anything. except maths. that is an unspeakable evil.
- College Major/Degree:
- Chemical Engineering (MEng)
- Favorite Area of Science:
- Chemistry
- Biography:
- A few details about me eh? well, i'm bad at writing details about myself for one :P
- Occupation:
- Operations Support Engineer
Contact Information
- E-mail:
- Private
- MSN:
-
insane_alien@msn.com
Topics I've Started
-
MSCR's and the coming Bureaucalypse
18 April 2012 - 05:08 PM
I came across a phenomenon that seemed strangely familiar today.
I was attempting to schedule a meeting amongst a few people from work today who are from a few different rungs on the corporate ladder. Aside from the obvious difficulties of finding a time when everybody's free that isn't a few years away, I had to contend with other meetings getting shuffled into my timeslot so I had to shuffle my meeting about (and since my meeting was somewhat important I got priority over some other meetings meaning they got shuffled). This seemed oddly familiar, then it hit me. A nuclear chain reaction!
So, I have begun developing a theory of MSCR's (Meeting Shuffle Chain Reactions). There logical conclusion of this is that there will be a critical density of meetings (measured in meetings per man-hour) that will cause at least one other meeting to be shuffled on average. Once at this point we will have a self sustaining chain reaction of meeting shuffles. What worries me is when we go past this point and on average each meeting shuffle cause >1 other meeting shuffles on average. We'll have a problem getting exponentially worse sucking up time and resources eventually leading to stagnation and death (The Bureaucalypse).
Anyone else encountered this phenomenon?

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!
Find My Content
Display name history




Comments
Phi for All
17 Dec 2011 - 15:13Daedalus
17 Dec 2011 - 06:39Moontanman
27 Jun 2010 - 16:03Syntho-sis
11 Sep 2009 - 17:38Basim
04 Aug 2009 - 15:35ydoaPs
20 Jul 2009 - 17:50Baby Astronaut
29 Jun 2009 - 15:04insane_alien
09 Aug 2008 - 18:06Royston
09 Aug 2008 - 12:49