Hipaso

Yeah I was expecting that, better experiments to confirm a ship can not travel faster than litle speed so we can not go to the stars You know Ill tell you a little anecdote that shows that this experiments dont deserve the slightest credibility but as you read it in a paper you believe it cause your gullible: Im a noctamble and sometimes I watch tv at night Once I watched a documental on Arthur C Clarcke retirement in an asiatic country To my shock in a moment of the documnetal Arthur C Clarcke admitted about being a pedophile but justified himself saying he only had sex with puber willingly childs in exchange of money Certainly Clarcke had sick eyes behind the glasse that memory will remain Researching on this documental i saw at night i found out it had been recorded im not very sure now if by the sun or the daily mirror to which they publish it in the paper news To the requirement of the interpol for this tape they couldnt provided it yet i saw it on tv at high night so they had to apologize Apparently Arthur C Clarcke was made an english lord some months later So if they can falsify the most basic and evident and spreaded piece of news why wouldnt be able to phalsify any experiment made by a few people the op points of Asimovs end of eternity ive been checking it and found this: One of the main themes is that space-travel, a staple in Asimov's other science fiction works, has been repeatedly stomped out in order to preserve the status quo and keep humanity on Earth (not out of sheer malice — but because advances in space travel always seem to coincide with increased drug use, crime etc, so these advances are undone "for the greater good".)

I dont understand very well that article but indeed the sun has an atmosphere and an atmosphere is bound to cause refraction, so seems that the thing that made Einstein got the nobel prize didnt have the slightest optic back up yet now he is your god but what strikes me its how this society manages to keep people submitted and sheeple like anything that goes against the stablishment is cranck and hence ultimately whats wrong is just going against the stablishment, so youre argument is that just going against the stablished is wrong because is crackpottery the sad thing is had the nazies won the war you would be saying that article is wrong because that guys are subhuman and you would provide some pictures that shew the colour of his skin is not anny different taking as granted a crackpot is wrong as a black guy is wrong Also as that crank points in his article the sky at night is pretty colourfull due to refractional lensing chromatic aberration not plain white as einstein would expect with his gravitational lensing: of course you may argue that colour is from doppler effect and expected by einstein this means eisntein takes two assumptions that light is bent by gravity and that light has colour by its speed limit while this guy explains both light bending and colour with a single phenomena of refraction so by pure occams razor this guy reasoning is better of course science is an authority thing where einstein is the top as the pope is the top for catholics and neither cant be wrong for their followers so einstein takes more and more assumptions and a cranck simplifies thing to a single assumption so what he is a crank so he is wrong and i prefer dogmatism to crackpottery

Only true genius can think outside the box Ordinary people must be kept controlled and docil and inside the box so they dont become annoying

Haha thats hilarious, the borg is here